This week's picks

Marshall vs. Old Dominion Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Marshall at Old Dominion

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 1:00 PM ET, S.B. Ballard Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Marshall, 55% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 1:00 PM ET
TVESPN+
WhereS.B. Ballard Stadium
Weather65°, clear, wind 12 mph
LineMarshall −2.5, total 43.5
Line movementTotal opened 46.5, down 3.
SeriesMarshall leads 10–1
Last meetingMarshall 48–24 in 2025

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Marshall by 1.554%46
PRIMEMarshall by 3.861%
EloMarshall68%
The lineMarshall −2.543.5, opened 46.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Marshall or Old Dominion?

Big Al's pick: Marshall. 61% to win

Which matchups decide Marshall vs. Old Dominion?

All three ratings favor Marshall, by 1.5 to 3.8 points. Old Dominion's way back in is its run defense, 23rd in EPA per rush allowed, against Marshall's run game at 96th.

Marshall with the ball

Old Dominion with the ball

Who's out for Marshall and Old Dominion?

Marshall

Old Dominion

How Marshall and Old Dominion compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Marshall is better on offense, 23.7 (92nd) to Old Dominion's 13.4 (135th) in SP+ offense. Old Dominion is better on defense, 27.5 (79th) to Marshall's 34.4 (125th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Marshall is better on offense, 23.7 (92nd) to Old Dominion's 13.4 (135th) in SP+ offense. Old Dominion is better on defense, 27.5 (79th) to Marshall's 34.4 (125th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Marshall23.7 (92nd)34.4 (125th)
Old Dominion13.4 (135th)27.5 (79th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Marshall is — in suplex and 57.9% (98th) in suplex allowed; Old Dominion is 44.4% (131st) and 48.6% (32nd).40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Marshall is — in suplex and 57.9% (98th) in suplex allowed; Old Dominion is 44.4% (131st) and 48.6% (32nd).
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Marshall—57.9% (98th)
Old Dominion44.4% (131st)48.6% (32nd)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Marshall is — in success rate and — in explosive play rate; Old Dominion is 33.5% (134th) and 9.3% (124th).8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Marshall is — in success rate and — in explosive play rate; Old Dominion is 33.5% (134th) and 9.3% (124th).
Success rateExplosive play rate
Marshall——
Old Dominion33.5% (134th)9.3% (124th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Marshall lands in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Old Dominion in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Old Dominion is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 36.3% (21st) to Marshall's 46.4% (115th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.8% (31st) to Marshall's 13.5% (109th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Marshall lands in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Old Dominion in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Old Dominion is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 36.3% (21st) to Marshall's 46.4% (115th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.8% (31st) to Marshall's 13.5% (109th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Marshall46.4% (115th)13.5% (109th)
Old Dominion36.3% (21st)9.8% (31st)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Marshall is — in yards per carry and — in yards per attempt; Old Dominion is 4.1 (124th) and 7.5 (73rd).46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Marshall is — in yards per carry and — in yards per attempt; Old Dominion is 4.16 (124th) and 7.55 (73rd).
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Marshall——
Old Dominion4.16 (124th)7.55 (73rd)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Marshall is — in 3rd down conversion and 43.7% (104th) in 3rd downs allowed; Old Dominion is 36.4% (95th) and 34.4% (38th).20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Marshall is — in 3rd down conversion and 43.7% (104th) in 3rd downs allowed; Old Dominion is 36.4% (95th) and 34.4% (38th).
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Marshall—43.7% (104th)
Old Dominion36.4% (95th)34.4% (38th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Marshall and Old Dominion are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Marshall's and Old Dominion's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Marshall's Zion Turner is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 43.2% passing success rate (79th of 171 quarterbacks) and 555 passing yards (141st). Old Dominion's Quinn Henicle is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 31.3% passing success rate (166th of 171 quarterbacks) and 650 passing yards (135th). Turner has the edge in passing success rate, Henicle in passing yards.20%30%40%50%60%70%05001,0001,5002,0002,5003,000Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑TurnerHenicle
Marshall's Zion Turner is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 43.2% passing success rate (79th of 171 quarterbacks) and 555 passing yards (141st). Old Dominion's Quinn Henicle is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 31.3% passing success rate (166th of 171 quarterbacks) and 650 passing yards (135th). Turner has the edge in passing success rate, Henicle in passing yards.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Zion Turner, Marshall43.2% (79th)555 (141st)
Quinn Henicle, Old Dominion31.3% (166th)650 (135th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Marshall's Joshon Barbie is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.4 yards per carry (250th of 360 running backs) and 44.7% rushing success rate (153rd). Old Dominion's Devin Roche is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.8 yards per carry (306th of 360 running backs) and 32.4% rushing success rate (324th). Barbie has the edge on both.24681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑BarbieRoche
Marshall's Joshon Barbie is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.4 yards per carry (250th of 360 running backs) and 44.7% rushing success rate (153rd). Old Dominion's Devin Roche is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.8 yards per carry (306th of 360 running backs) and 32.4% rushing success rate (324th). Barbie has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Joshon Barbie, Marshall4.4 (250th)44.7% (153rd)
Devin Roche, Old Dominion3.8 (306th)32.4% (324th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Marshall's Adrian Norton is in the role players corner, below average in both: 4 explosive catches (363rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 171 receiving yards (426th). Marshall's Owen Sweeney is in the role players corner, below average in both: 4 explosive catches (364th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 108 receiving yards (567th). Old Dominion's TJ Johnson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 3 explosive catches (479th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 265 receiving yards (247th). Old Dominion's Josh Rodriguez is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (295th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 238 receiving yards (290th).051015202502004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑NortonSweeneyRodriguezJohnson
Marshall's Adrian Norton is in the role players corner, below average in both: 4 explosive catches (363rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 171 receiving yards (426th). Marshall's Owen Sweeney is in the role players corner, below average in both: 4 explosive catches (364th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 108 receiving yards (567th). Old Dominion's TJ Johnson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 3 explosive catches (479th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 265 receiving yards (247th). Old Dominion's Josh Rodriguez is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (295th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 238 receiving yards (290th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Adrian Norton, Marshall4 (363rd)171 (426th)
Owen Sweeney, Marshall4 (364th)108 (567th)
TJ Johnson, Old Dominion3 (479th)265 (247th)
Josh Rodriguez, Old Dominion5 (295th)238 (290th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Marshall's top playmaker is Braydin Ward (1 fumble recovery), 987th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Old Dominion's top playmaker is Brandon Crutchfield (1 sack, 2 INTs, 1 fumble recovery), 72nd of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Brandon Crutchfield, Old Dominion1 sack, 2 INTs, 1 fumble recoveryJackson Forrest, Old Dominion3 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryJaven Gibson, Old Dominion3 sacks, 1 INTBraydin Ward, Marshall1 fumble recoveryCaleb Clark-Glover, Marshall1 INTCannon Lewis, Marshall1 fumble recovery
Marshall's top playmaker is Braydin Ward (1 fumble recovery), 987th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Old Dominion's top playmaker is Brandon Crutchfield (1 sack, 2 INTs, 1 fumble recovery), 72nd of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Brandon Crutchfield, Old Dominion12172nd
Jackson Forrest, Old Dominion30173rd
Javen Gibson, Old Dominion31074th
Braydin Ward, Marshall001987th
Caleb Clark-Glover, Marshall010988th
Cannon Lewis, Marshall001989th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Marshall and Old Dominion?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Marshall 4.0 points better (111th to 124th). PRIME also has Marshall ahead, by 6.3. Elo, which only sees results, also has Marshall ahead (99th to 125th).

MarshallOld Dominion
SP+ overall-10.7 (111th)-14.7 (124th)
SP+ offense23.7 (92nd)13.4 (135th)
SP+ defense34.4 (125th)27.5 (79th)
SP+ special teams-0.1 (80th)-0.6 (131st)
PRIME net-12.0 (118th)-18.3 (133rd)
PRIME offense-6.66 (115th)-15.24 (137th)
PRIME defense-4.74 (103rd)-0.92 (78th)
PRIME SOS-7.8 (122nd)-2.7 (72nd)
PRIME SOR-0.8 (93rd)-2.5 (125th)
Elo1355 (99th)1171 (125th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Marshall's offense ranks 90th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Old Dominion defense it faces ranks 32nd in EPA per play allowed. Old Dominion's offense ranks 138th against Marshall's 118th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Old Dominion's backs in the open field: 88th in adjusted open-field yards per carry, against Marshall's 117th-ranked defense. Adjust for opponents and Marshall's offense falls from 63rd to 90th in EPA per play: a lot of that came against soft defenses.

MarshallOld Dominion
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.07 (90th)−0.10 (138th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.17 (82nd)+0.02 (138th)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.04 (96th)−0.08 (138th)
Success rate (adjusted)41.4% (72nd)31.1% (138th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)47.8% (47th)36.5% (138th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)30.4% (69th)28.2% (114th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.92 (107th)0.92 (102nd)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.92 (85th)2.31 (138th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.08 (87th)1.07 (88th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.18 (118th)+0.05 (32nd)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.27 (115th)+0.17 (60th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.12 (114th)+0.01 (23rd)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)45.2% (109th)39.7% (36th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.92 (44th)0.89 (9th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.10 (114th)2.87 (42nd)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.33 (117th)0.87 (7th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Marshall or Old Dominion?

Marshall is about as good throwing (64th in EPA per pass) as running (75th). Old Dominion is about as good throwing (137th in EPA per pass) as running (134th). On third down, Marshall has the edge: its offense ranks 17th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 83rd.

MarshallOld Dominion
EPA per play+0.15 (63rd)−0.15 (138th)
EPA per pass+0.23 (64th)−0.13 (137th)
EPA per rush+0.09 (75th)−0.15 (134th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.66 (17th)+0.26 (113th)
EPA per play allowed+0.25 (129th)+0.03 (36th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.44 (134th)+0.20 (80th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.14 (104th)−0.09 (13th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.63 (128th)+0.43 (83rd)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Marshall or Old Dominion?

Marshall is outscored by 9.0 a game, and Old Dominion is outscored by 11.3. Marshall's offense ranks 109th in scoring, and the Old Dominion defense it faces ranks 97th in points allowed. Old Dominion's offense ranks 133rd against Marshall's 118th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.

MarshallOld Dominion
Points scored21.7 (109th)15.5 (133rd)
Points allowed30.7 (118th)26.8 (97th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Old Dominion has no clear edge here. Its best is 3rd down conversion rate, 95th, against a defense ranked 104th in 3rd down conversions allowed.

MarshallOld Dominion
Pass yards / game— ()152.9 (127th)
Rush yards / game— ()127.0 (119th)
Yards per play— ()5.07 (129th)
Yards per carry— ()4.16 (124th)
Yards per attempt— ()7.55 (73rd)
Completion %— ()64.8% (61st)
Success rate— ()33.5% (134th)
Explosive play rate— ()9.3% (124th)
3rd down conversion— ()36.4% (95th)
Sack rate (taken)— ()18.2% (133rd)
INT rate (thrown)— ()3.7% (118th)
SUPLEX— ()44.4% (131st)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Marshall's defense is best placed to pick off passes: it ranks 81st in interception rate, and Old Dominion's offense is bottom-20 at avoiding interceptions (118th).

MarshallOld Dominion
Pass yards allowed / game243.7 (112th)217.8 (84th)
Rush yards allowed / game190.0 (115th)145.4 (63rd)
Yards per play allowed7.08 (129th)5.09 (21st)
Yards per carry allowed5.78 (122nd)4.41 (43rd)
Yards per attempt allowed8.84 (117th)5.99 (23rd)
Success rate allowed46.4% (115th)36.3% (21st)
Explosive plays allowed13.5% (109th)9.8% (31st)
3rd downs allowed43.7% (104th)34.4% (38th)
Sack rate (generated)3.0% (130th)5.2% (91st)
INT rate (generated)2.1% (81st)1.7% (99th)
SUPLEX allowed57.9% (98th)48.6% (32nd)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

MarshallOld Dominion
Interceptions thrown / game— ()0.75 (75th)
Fumbles lost / game— ()1.25 (133rd)
Giveaways / game— ()2.00 (128th)
Interceptions / game0.57 (84th)0.63 (77th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.00 (131st)0.88 (9th)
Takeaways / game0.57 (126th)1.50 (36th)
Turnover margin / game— ()-0.5 (103rd)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Marshall has the more talented roster (97th in the 247Sports talent composite; Old Dominion is 122nd). Marshall also plays further above its talent: −6.4 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Old Dominion's −7.3.

MarshallOld Dominion
Talent composite594.7 (97th)544.3 (122nd)
Blue-chip ratio6.2% (89th)0.0% (126th)
Players on roster105 (106th)103 (119th)
Rated by 247Sports65 (114th)67 (106th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players4 (88th)0 (126th)
3-star players60 (74th)62 (64th)
Below 3-star1 (86th)5 (29th)
2026 transfers in28 (41st)16 (111th)
Transfer share43.1% (28th)23.9% (93rd)
SP+ vs. talent-6.4 (107th)-7.3 (113th)
Returning production98.8% (2nd)9.2% (120th)
Returning passing production100.2% (10th)-1.9% (123rd)
Returning rushing production210.4% (4th)9.8% (104th)
Returning receiving production91.4% (6th)18.0% (107th)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)123 (123rd)96 (96th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes117.8 (123rd)111.2 (114th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Marshall is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (+1.3). Old Dominion is −2.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (−1.2).

MarshallOld Dominion
BAWA (total)+0.5 (57th)-2.0 (125th)
Schedule BAWA+1.3 (27th)+0.7 (56th)
Roster BAWA-0.2 (82nd)-1.2 (130th)
Coach BAWA-1.1 (114th)-1.2 (117th)
Luck BAWA+0.5 (39th)-0.3 (86th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Marshall at Old Dominion: questions people ask

Who will win Marshall at Old Dominion?

Big Al picks Marshall, 61% to win. All three ratings favor the same team.

When and where is Marshall at Old Dominion?

Sat, Oct 31, 1:00 PM ET at S.B. Ballard Stadium, on ESPN+.

What's the line for Marshall at Old Dominion?

DraftKings has Marshall −2.5, total 43.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Marshall–Old Dominion series record?

Marshall leads 10–1. Last meeting: Marshall won 48–24 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in Marshall at Old Dominion?

Marshall's is Zion Turner (555 passing yards this season); Old Dominion's is Quinn Henicle (650 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Marshall and Old Dominion: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.