This week's picks

Southern Miss vs. UL Monroe Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. Big Al's pick is the team at least two of them favor.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Southern Miss at UL Monroe

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 3:30 PM ET, Malone Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Southern Miss, 66% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 3:30 PM ET
TVESPN+
WhereMalone Stadium
Weather78°, wind 5 mph
LineSouthern Miss −3.5, total 55.5
Line movementOpened Southern Miss −3; moved 0.5 points toward Southern Miss. Total opened 52.5, up 3.
SeriesSouthern Miss leads 7–3
Last meetingSouthern Miss 49–21 in 2025

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Southern Miss by 5.766%56
PRIMESouthern Miss by 4.262%
EloSouthern Miss65%
The lineSouthern Miss −3.5, opened −355.5, opened 52.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Southern Miss or UL Monroe?

Big Al's pick: Southern Miss. 64% to win

Which matchups decide Southern Miss vs. UL Monroe?

All three ratings favor Southern Miss, by 4.2 to 5.7 points. Southern Miss' best matchup is its offensive line, 38th in line yards per carry, against UL Monroe's run-stopping front at 135th. UL Monroe's way back in is its offense, 46th in success rate, against Southern Miss' defense at 82nd.

Southern Miss with the ball

UL Monroe with the ball

Who's out for Southern Miss and UL Monroe?

Southern Miss

UL Monroe

How Southern Miss and UL Monroe compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Southern Miss is ahead on offense, 20.2 (108th) to UL Monroe's 14.7 (131st) in SP+ offense, and slightly ahead on defense, 35.6 (129th) to UL Monroe's 38.2 (134th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Southern Miss is ahead on offense, 20.2 (108th) to UL Monroe's 14.7 (131st) in SP+ offense, and slightly ahead on defense, 35.6 (129th) to UL Monroe's 38.2 (134th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Southern Miss20.2 (108th)35.6 (129th)
UL Monroe14.7 (131st)38.2 (134th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Both land in the offense carries it corner: better than average on offense, below it on defense. UL Monroe is slightly ahead on offense, 61.3% (29th) to Southern Miss' 61.1% (30th) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 54.2% (71st) to Southern Miss' 56.9% (89th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Both land in the offense carries it corner: better than average on offense, below it on defense. UL Monroe is slightly ahead on offense, 61.3% (29th) to Southern Miss' 61.1% (30th) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 54.2% (71st) to Southern Miss' 56.9% (89th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Southern Miss61.1% (30th)56.9% (89th)
UL Monroe61.3% (29th)54.2% (71st)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Southern Miss lands in the boom or bust corner (better than average at hitting big plays, below it at staying on schedule); UL Monroe in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays). UL Monroe is better at staying on schedule, 45.7% (46th) to Southern Miss' 43.6% (71st) in success rate. Southern Miss is better at hitting big plays, 13.1% (45th) to UL Monroe's 12.1% (73rd) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Southern Miss lands in the boom or bust corner (better than average at hitting big plays, below it at staying on schedule); UL Monroe in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays). UL Monroe is better at staying on schedule, 45.7% (46th) to Southern Miss' 43.6% (71st) in success rate. Southern Miss is better at hitting big plays, 13.1% (45th) to UL Monroe's 12.1% (73rd) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Southern Miss43.6% (71st)13.1% (45th)
UL Monroe45.7% (46th)12.1% (73rd)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Both land in the leaky corner: below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. Southern Miss is slightly better at keeping offenses behind schedule, 43.0% (82nd) to UL Monroe's 43.5% (88th) in success rate allowed. UL Monroe is slightly better at limiting big plays, 12.1% (89th) to Southern Miss' 12.4% (96th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Both land in the leaky corner: below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. Southern Miss is slightly better at keeping offenses behind schedule, 43.0% (82nd) to UL Monroe's 43.5% (88th) in success rate allowed. UL Monroe is slightly better at limiting big plays, 12.1% (89th) to Southern Miss' 12.4% (96th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Southern Miss43.0% (82nd)12.4% (96th)
UL Monroe43.5% (88th)12.1% (89th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Southern Miss lands in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it); UL Monroe in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). Southern Miss is better running it, 5.4 (53rd) to UL Monroe's 4.1 (123rd) in yards per carry. UL Monroe is better throwing it, 8.4 (41st) to Southern Miss' 7.3 (82nd) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Southern Miss lands in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it); UL Monroe in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). Southern Miss is better running it, 5.40 (53rd) to UL Monroe's 4.19 (123rd) in yards per carry. UL Monroe is better throwing it, 8.40 (41st) to Southern Miss' 7.34 (82nd) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Southern Miss5.40 (53rd)7.34 (82nd)
UL Monroe4.19 (123rd)8.40 (41st)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Southern Miss lands in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs); UL Monroe in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). UL Monroe is slightly better at converting third downs, 33.3% (112th) to Southern Miss' 32.6% (120th) in 3rd down conversion. Southern Miss is better at getting off the field on third down, 38.6% (69th) to UL Monroe's 40.4% (84th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Southern Miss lands in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs); UL Monroe in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). UL Monroe is slightly better at converting third downs, 33.3% (112th) to Southern Miss' 32.6% (120th) in 3rd down conversion. Southern Miss is better at getting off the field on third down, 38.6% (69th) to UL Monroe's 40.4% (84th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Southern Miss32.6% (120th)38.6% (69th)
UL Monroe33.3% (112th)40.4% (84th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Southern Miss and UL Monroe are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Southern Miss' and UL Monroe's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Southern Miss' Landy Lyddy is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 36.6% passing success rate (148th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,216 passing yards (91st). UL Monroe's Aidan Armenta is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 42.8% passing success rate (82nd of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,147 passing yards (98th). Armenta has the edge in passing success rate, Lyddy in passing yards.30%40%50%60%70%1,0001,5002,0002,5003,000Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑LyddyArmenta
Southern Miss' Landy Lyddy is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 36.6% passing success rate (148th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,216 passing yards (91st). UL Monroe's Aidan Armenta is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 42.8% passing success rate (82nd of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,147 passing yards (98th). Armenta has the edge in passing success rate, Lyddy in passing yards.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Landy Lyddy, Southern Miss36.6% (148th)1,216 (91st)
Aidan Armenta, UL Monroe42.8% (82nd)1,147 (98th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Southern Miss' Steven Robinson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.8 yards per carry (191st of 360 running backs) and 47.9% rushing success rate (98th). UL Monroe's Bryson Roland is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.5 yards per carry (333rd of 360 running backs) and 26.2% rushing success rate (351st). Robinson has the edge on both.24681020%30%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑RobinsonRoland
Southern Miss' Steven Robinson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.8 yards per carry (191st of 360 running backs) and 47.9% rushing success rate (98th). UL Monroe's Bryson Roland is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.5 yards per carry (333rd of 360 running backs) and 26.2% rushing success rate (351st). Robinson has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Steven Robinson, Southern Miss4.8 (191st)47.9% (98th)
Bryson Roland, UL Monroe3.5 (333rd)26.2% (351st)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Southern Miss' Mario Sanders II is in the big plays on low volume corner, above average in explosive catches, below it in receiving yards: 16 explosive catches (20th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 573 receiving yards (33rd). Southern Miss' A.J. Little is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (304th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 273 receiving yards (229th). UL Monroe's Marcellus Jackson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (316th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 289 receiving yards (202nd). UL Monroe's Parker Fulghum is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (183rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 224 receiving yards (312th).051015202502004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑LittleSanders IIJacksonFulghum
Southern Miss' Mario Sanders II is in the big plays on low volume corner, above average in explosive catches, below it in receiving yards: 16 explosive catches (20th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 573 receiving yards (33rd). Southern Miss' A.J. Little is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (304th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 273 receiving yards (229th). UL Monroe's Marcellus Jackson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (316th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 289 receiving yards (202nd). UL Monroe's Parker Fulghum is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (183rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 224 receiving yards (312th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Mario Sanders II, Southern Miss16 (20th)573 (33rd)
A.J. Little, Southern Miss5 (304th)273 (229th)
Marcellus Jackson, UL Monroe5 (316th)289 (202nd)
Parker Fulghum, UL Monroe7 (183rd)224 (312th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Southern Miss' top playmaker is Kobi Albert (3 INTs, 1 fumble recovery), 80th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. UL Monroe's top playmaker is Carl Fauntroy Jr. (1 sack, 1 INT), 555th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Kobi Albert, Southern Miss3 INTs, 1 fumble recoveryRamon Pernas, Southern Miss2 sacksCarl Fauntroy Jr., UL Monroe1 sack, 1 INTJaeden Calender, UL Monroe2 sacksAvery Sledge, Southern Miss1 sackArmoni Rue, UL Monroe1 INT
Southern Miss' top playmaker is Kobi Albert (3 INTs, 1 fumble recovery), 80th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. UL Monroe's top playmaker is Carl Fauntroy Jr. (1 sack, 1 INT), 555th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Kobi Albert, Southern Miss03180th
Ramon Pernas, Southern Miss200508th
Carl Fauntroy Jr., UL Monroe110555th
Jaeden Calender, UL Monroe200556th
Avery Sledge, Southern Miss1001335th
Armoni Rue, UL Monroe0101444th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Southern Miss and UL Monroe?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Southern Miss 8.2 points better (126th to 133rd). PRIME also has Southern Miss ahead, by 6.7. Elo, which only sees results, also has Southern Miss ahead (122nd to 133rd).

Southern MissUL Monroe
SP+ overall-16.0 (126th)-24.2 (133rd)
SP+ offense20.2 (108th)14.7 (131st)
SP+ defense35.6 (129th)38.2 (134th)
SP+ special teams-0.6 (131st)-0.7 (137th)
PRIME net-13.4 (123rd)-20.1 (134th)
PRIME offense-5.36 (107th)-10.79 (134th)
PRIME defense-7.42 (123rd)-7.44 (124th)
PRIME SOS-7.2 (116th)-4.9 (94th)
PRIME SOR-2.7 (128th)-3.3 (131st)
Elo1197 (122nd)1036 (133rd)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Southern Miss' offense ranks 129th in adjusted EPA per play, and the UL Monroe defense it faces ranks 122nd in EPA per play allowed. UL Monroe's offense ranks 127th against Southern Miss' 116th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Southern Miss' offensive line in the run game: 38th in adjusted line yards per carry, against UL Monroe's 135th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch.

Southern MissUL Monroe
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.00 (129th)+0.01 (127th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.08 (129th)+0.16 (92nd)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.05 (84th)−0.03 (129th)
Success rate (adjusted)38.0% (117th)37.2% (123rd)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)46.7% (69th)44.5% (109th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)24.7% (138th)27.6% (120th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.93 (84th)0.91 (123rd)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)3.07 (38th)2.84 (108th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.14 (66th)0.91 (128th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.18 (116th)+0.20 (122nd)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.22 (86th)+0.26 (110th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.15 (128th)+0.14 (125th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)46.7% (125th)44.6% (106th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.95 (102nd)0.95 (96th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.16 (120th)3.26 (135th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.37 (124th)1.24 (97th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Southern Miss or UL Monroe?

Southern Miss is better running (56th in EPA per rush) than throwing (119th). UL Monroe's run defense ranks 121st, so that's a mismatch. UL Monroe is about as good throwing (127th in EPA per pass) as running (118th).

Southern MissUL Monroe
EPA per play+0.02 (118th)−0.05 (133rd)
EPA per pass+0.03 (119th)−0.01 (127th)
EPA per rush+0.13 (56th)−0.01 (118th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.10 (131st)+0.15 (126th)
EPA per play allowed+0.16 (102nd)+0.22 (119th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.22 (85th)+0.34 (115th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.19 (126th)+0.18 (121st)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.40 (73rd)+0.48 (97th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Southern Miss or UL Monroe?

Southern Miss is outscored by 6.7 a game, and UL Monroe is outscored by 17.2. Southern Miss' offense ranks 91st in scoring, and the UL Monroe defense it faces ranks 134th in points allowed. UL Monroe's offense ranks 120th against Southern Miss' 123rd-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Southern Miss' offense against UL Monroe's defense.

Southern MissUL Monroe
Points scored25.7 (91st)20.1 (120th)
Points allowed32.4 (123rd)37.3 (134th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Southern Miss' best matchup is its run game: its offense ranks 53rd in yards per carry, and UL Monroe's defense ranks 119th in yards per carry allowed. That's a mismatch. UL Monroe's best matchup is early downs: its offense ranks 29th in SUPLEX, and Southern Miss' defense ranks 89th in SUPLEX allowed. That's a mismatch.

Southern MissUL Monroe
Pass yards / game255.9 (42nd)218.4 (80th)
Rush yards / game169.0 (64th)121.6 (123rd)
Yards per play6.26 (61st)5.98 (87th)
Yards per carry5.40 (53rd)4.19 (123rd)
Yards per attempt7.34 (82nd)8.40 (41st)
Completion %61.9% (78th)75.8% (9th)
Success rate43.6% (71st)45.7% (46th)
Explosive play rate13.1% (45th)12.1% (73rd)
3rd down conversion32.6% (120th)33.3% (112th)
Sack rate (taken)4.7% (47th)6.7% (93rd)
INT rate (thrown)3.7% (117th)3.3% (107th)
SUPLEX61.1% (30th)61.3% (29th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Southern Miss' defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 30th in sack rate, and UL Monroe's offense is middle of the pack at avoiding sacks (93rd). That's a mismatch. UL Monroe's defense is best placed to get off the field on third down: it ranks 84th in 3rd down conversions allowed, and Southern Miss' offense is bottom-20 in 3rd down conversion rate (120th).

Southern MissUL Monroe
Pass yards allowed / game205.1 (58th)227.4 (98th)
Rush yards allowed / game249.4 (136th)228.3 (135th)
Yards per play allowed5.98 (80th)6.15 (88th)
Yards per carry allowed5.71 (118th)5.73 (119th)
Yards per attempt allowed6.90 (61st)7.01 (67th)
Success rate allowed43.0% (82nd)43.5% (88th)
Explosive plays allowed12.4% (96th)12.1% (89th)
3rd downs allowed38.6% (69th)40.4% (84th)
Sack rate (generated)8.0% (30th)5.4% (83rd)
INT rate (generated)2.9% (55th)1.3% (112th)
SUPLEX allowed56.9% (89th)54.2% (71st)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: Southern Miss is −0.4 a game and UL Monroe −0.4.

Southern MissUL Monroe
Interceptions thrown / game1.29 (127th)0.86 (84th)
Fumbles lost / game0.29 (20th)0.43 (53rd)
Giveaways / game1.57 (107th)1.29 (71st)
Interceptions / game0.86 (45th)0.43 (105th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.29 (94th)0.43 (68th)
Takeaways / game1.14 (66th)0.86 (107th)
Turnover margin / game-0.4 (98th)-0.4 (100th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Southern Miss has the more talented roster (94th in the 247Sports talent composite; UL Monroe is 132nd). Southern Miss also plays further above its talent: −12.2 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to UL Monroe's −14.3.

Southern MissUL Monroe
Talent composite602.6 (94th)505.5 (132nd)
Blue-chip ratio11.7% (61st)1.8% (119th)
Players on roster112 (58th)98 (134th)
Rated by 247Sports60 (121st)56 (128th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players7 (70th)1 (119th)
3-star players52 (102nd)46 (114th)
Below 3-star1 (86th)9 (6th)
2026 transfers in39 (14th)20 (76th)
Transfer share65.0% (8th)35.7% (43rd)
SP+ vs. talent-12.2 (127th)-14.3 (133rd)
Returning production90.2% (7th)38.7% (70th)
Returning passing production97.4% (21st)78.2% (54th)
Returning rushing production101.9% (15th)15.7% (99th)
Returning receiving production81.9% (11th)25.9% (92nd)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)108 (108th)127 (127th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes92.8 (90th)120.5 (126th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Southern Miss is −1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−2.1). UL Monroe is −2.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.9).

Southern MissUL Monroe
BAWA (total)-1.5 (115th)-2.5 (129th)
Schedule BAWA+1.1 (40th)+1.3 (28th)
Roster BAWA-0.3 (86th)-1.4 (134th)
Coach BAWA-2.1 (136th)-1.9 (133rd)
Luck BAWA-0.2 (79th)-0.6 (104th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Southern Miss at UL Monroe: questions people ask

Who will win Southern Miss at UL Monroe?

Big Al picks Southern Miss, 64% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Southern Miss' best matchup is its offensive line, 38th in line yards per carry, against UL Monroe's run-stopping front at 135th.

When and where is Southern Miss at UL Monroe?

Sat, Oct 31, 3:30 PM ET at Malone Stadium, on ESPN+.

What's the line for Southern Miss at UL Monroe?

DraftKings has Southern Miss −3.5, total 55.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Southern Miss–UL Monroe series record?

Southern Miss leads 7–3. Last meeting: Southern Miss won 49–21 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in Southern Miss at UL Monroe?

Southern Miss' is Landy Lyddy (1,216 passing yards this season); UL Monroe's is Aidan Armenta (1,147 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Southern Miss and UL Monroe: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.