This week's picks

South Carolina vs. Oklahoma Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

South Carolina at Oklahoma

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 4:15 PM ET, Memorial Stadium (Norman, OK).

Big Al's pick: Oklahoma, 58% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 4:15 PM ET
TVSEC Network
WhereMemorial Stadium (Norman, OK)
Weather66°, overcast, wind 8 mph
LineOklahoma −4.5, total 44.5
Line movementOpened Oklahoma −5.5; moved 1 point toward South Carolina. Total opened 43.5, up 1.
SeriesTied 1–1
Last meetingOklahoma 26–7 in 2025

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Oklahoma by 1.855%44
PRIMEOklahoma by 3.058%
EloOklahoma60%
The lineOklahoma −4.5, opened −5.544.5, opened 43.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, South Carolina or Oklahoma?

Big Al's pick: Oklahoma. 58% to win

Which matchups decide South Carolina vs. Oklahoma?

All three ratings favor Oklahoma, by 1.8 to 3.0 points. Oklahoma's best matchup is its pass rush, 5th in sack rate, against South Carolina's pass protection at 88th. South Carolina's way back in is its run defense, 35th in EPA per rush allowed, against Oklahoma's run game at 131st.

South Carolina with the ball

Oklahoma with the ball

Who's out for South Carolina and Oklahoma?

South Carolina

Oklahoma

How South Carolina and Oklahoma compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? South Carolina lands in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Oklahoma in the defense first corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense). South Carolina is better on offense, 33.6 (23rd) to Oklahoma's 24.3 (88th) in SP+ offense. Oklahoma is better on defense, 14.2 (6th) to South Carolina's 23.1 (47th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
South Carolina lands in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Oklahoma in the defense first corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense). South Carolina is better on offense, 33.6 (23rd) to Oklahoma's 24.3 (88th) in SP+ offense. Oklahoma is better on defense, 14.2 (6th) to South Carolina's 23.1 (47th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
South Carolina33.6 (23rd)23.1 (47th)
Oklahoma24.3 (88th)14.2 (6th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? South Carolina lands in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Oklahoma in the defense carries it corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense). South Carolina is better on offense, 56.7% (66th) to Oklahoma's 46.0% (126th) in SUPLEX. Oklahoma is better on defense, 43.7% (11th) to South Carolina's 54.0% (70th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
South Carolina lands in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Oklahoma in the defense carries it corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense). South Carolina is better on offense, 56.7% (66th) to Oklahoma's 46.0% (126th) in SUPLEX. Oklahoma is better on defense, 43.7% (11th) to South Carolina's 54.0% (70th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
South Carolina56.7% (66th)54.0% (70th)
Oklahoma46.0% (126th)43.7% (11th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? South Carolina lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Oklahoma in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). South Carolina is ahead at staying on schedule, 48.4% (27th) to Oklahoma's 39.4% (111th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 13.7% (37th) to Oklahoma's 9.3% (123rd) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
South Carolina lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Oklahoma in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). South Carolina is ahead at staying on schedule, 48.4% (27th) to Oklahoma's 39.4% (111th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 13.7% (37th) to Oklahoma's 9.3% (123rd) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
South Carolina48.4% (27th)13.7% (37th)
Oklahoma39.4% (111th)9.3% (123rd)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? South Carolina lands in the bend, don't break corner (better than average at limiting big plays, below it at keeping offenses behind schedule); Oklahoma in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Oklahoma is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 32.9% (6th) to South Carolina's 41.9% (69th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.1% (18th) to South Carolina's 10.6% (59th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
South Carolina lands in the bend, don't break corner (better than average at limiting big plays, below it at keeping offenses behind schedule); Oklahoma in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Oklahoma is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 32.9% (6th) to South Carolina's 41.9% (69th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.1% (18th) to South Carolina's 10.6% (59th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
South Carolina41.9% (69th)10.6% (59th)
Oklahoma32.9% (6th)9.1% (18th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? South Carolina lands in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it); Oklahoma in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). South Carolina is better running it, 6.4 (5th) to Oklahoma's 3.9 (129th) in yards per carry. Oklahoma is better throwing it, 8.0 (49th) to South Carolina's 7.6 (70th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
South Carolina lands in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it); Oklahoma in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). South Carolina is better running it, 6.49 (5th) to Oklahoma's 3.98 (129th) in yards per carry. Oklahoma is better throwing it, 8.04 (49th) to South Carolina's 7.60 (70th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
South Carolina6.49 (5th)7.60 (70th)
Oklahoma3.98 (129th)8.04 (49th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? South Carolina lands in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); Oklahoma in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs). South Carolina is better at converting third downs, 48.0% (18th) to Oklahoma's 36.8% (90th) in 3rd down conversion. Oklahoma is better at getting off the field on third down, 25.3% (3rd) to South Carolina's 35.8% (48th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
South Carolina lands in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); Oklahoma in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs). South Carolina is better at converting third downs, 48.0% (18th) to Oklahoma's 36.8% (90th) in 3rd down conversion. Oklahoma is better at getting off the field on third down, 25.3% (3rd) to South Carolina's 35.8% (48th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
South Carolina48.0% (18th)35.8% (48th)
Oklahoma36.8% (90th)25.3% (3rd)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; South Carolina and Oklahoma are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How South Carolina's and Oklahoma's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? South Carolina's Lanorris Sellers is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 43.4% passing success rate (75th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,594 passing yards (45th). Oklahoma's John Mateer is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 40.9% passing success rate (100th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,603 passing yards (43rd). Sellers has the edge in passing success rate, Mateer in passing yards.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑MateerSellers
South Carolina's Lanorris Sellers is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 43.4% passing success rate (75th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,594 passing yards (45th). Oklahoma's John Mateer is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 40.9% passing success rate (100th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,603 passing yards (43rd). Sellers has the edge in passing success rate, Mateer in passing yards.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Lanorris Sellers, South Carolina43.4% (75th)1,594 (45th)
John Mateer, Oklahoma40.9% (100th)1,603 (43rd)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? South Carolina's Matthew Fuller is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.8 yards per carry (82nd of 360 running backs) and 42.0% rushing success rate (205th). Oklahoma's Lloyd Avant is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.5 yards per carry (231st of 360 running backs) and 44.4% rushing success rate (158th). Fuller has the edge in yards per carry, Avant in rushing success rate.4681040%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑AvantFuller
South Carolina's Matthew Fuller is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.8 yards per carry (82nd of 360 running backs) and 42.0% rushing success rate (205th). Oklahoma's Lloyd Avant is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.5 yards per carry (231st of 360 running backs) and 44.4% rushing success rate (158th). Fuller has the edge in yards per carry, Avant in rushing success rate.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Matthew Fuller, South Carolina5.8 (82nd)42.0% (205th)
Lloyd Avant, Oklahoma4.5 (231st)44.4% (158th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? South Carolina's Mazeo Bennett is in the role players corner, below average in both: 8 explosive catches (140th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 334 receiving yards (153rd). South Carolina's Nyck Harbor is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (175th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 288 receiving yards (203rd). Oklahoma's Isaiah Sategna is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (67th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 578 receiving yards (32nd). Oklahoma's Rocky Beers is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (105th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 395 receiving yards (103rd).5101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑SategnaBeersBennettHarbor
South Carolina's Mazeo Bennett is in the role players corner, below average in both: 8 explosive catches (140th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 334 receiving yards (153rd). South Carolina's Nyck Harbor is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (175th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 288 receiving yards (203rd). Oklahoma's Isaiah Sategna is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (67th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 578 receiving yards (32nd). Oklahoma's Rocky Beers is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (105th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 395 receiving yards (103rd).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Mazeo Bennett, South Carolina8 (140th)334 (153rd)
Nyck Harbor, South Carolina7 (175th)288 (203rd)
Isaiah Sategna, Oklahoma11 (67th)578 (32nd)
Rocky Beers, Oklahoma9 (105th)395 (103rd)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? South Carolina's top playmaker is Tomiwa Durojaiye (3 sacks, 1 fumble recovery), 79th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Oklahoma's top playmaker is Adepoju Adebawore (3 sacks), 197th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Tomiwa Durojaiye, South Carolina3 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryAnthony Addison, South Carolina3 sacksAdepoju Adebawore, Oklahoma3 sacksOwen Heinecke, Oklahoma3 sacksPeyton Bowen, Oklahoma1 sack, 2 INTsCaleb Herring, South Carolina2 sacks
South Carolina's top playmaker is Tomiwa Durojaiye (3 sacks, 1 fumble recovery), 79th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Oklahoma's top playmaker is Adepoju Adebawore (3 sacks), 197th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Tomiwa Durojaiye, South Carolina30179th
Anthony Addison, South Carolina300213th
Adepoju Adebawore, Oklahoma300197th
Owen Heinecke, Oklahoma300198th
Peyton Bowen, Oklahoma120199th
Caleb Herring, South Carolina200505th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate South Carolina and Oklahoma?

On a neutral field, SP+ has South Carolina 0.7 points better (28th to 33rd). PRIME has Oklahoma by 0.5 instead. Elo, which only sees results, has Oklahoma ahead (27th to 34th).

South CarolinaOklahoma
SP+ overall11.0 (28th)10.3 (33rd)
SP+ offense33.6 (23rd)24.3 (88th)
SP+ defense23.1 (47th)14.2 (6th)
SP+ special teams0.5 (4th)0.2 (42nd)
PRIME net11.0 (26th)11.5 (25th)
PRIME offense7.90 (23rd)-2.49 (86th)
PRIME defense3.23 (42nd)13.03 (4th)
PRIME SOS2.7 (17th)7.8 (2nd)
PRIME SOR1.0 (41st)1.8 (22nd)
Elo1702 (34th)1719 (27th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

South Carolina's offense ranks 20th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Oklahoma defense it faces ranks 2nd in EPA per play allowed. Oklahoma's offense ranks 101st against South Carolina's 76th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Oklahoma's passing game: 33rd in adjusted EPA per pass, against South Carolina's 107th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and South Carolina's offense climbs from 50th to 20th in EPA per play: it has done its work against good defenses.

South CarolinaOklahoma
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.19 (20th)+0.06 (101st)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.23 (36th)+0.23 (33rd)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.13 (24th)−0.04 (131st)
Success rate (adjusted)45.5% (30th)40.2% (86th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)51.2% (14th)44.5% (109th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)30.3% (75th)30.4% (70th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.93 (79th)0.88 (135th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)3.21 (6th)2.83 (110th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.27 (30th)1.07 (89th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.11 (76th)−0.05 (2nd)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.26 (107th)+0.07 (6th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.03 (35th)−0.02 (12th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)41.1% (58th)33.3% (2nd)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.91 (22nd)0.95 (93rd)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)2.80 (24th)2.82 (28th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.06 (51st)1.09 (56th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, South Carolina or Oklahoma?

South Carolina is better running (13th in EPA per rush) than throwing (91st). Oklahoma's run defense ranks 20th, so that's strength on strength. Oklahoma is better throwing (74th in EPA per pass) than running (137th). South Carolina's pass defense ranks 118th, so that's an edge.

South CarolinaOklahoma
EPA per play+0.18 (50th)−0.02 (125th)
EPA per pass+0.16 (91st)+0.21 (74th)
EPA per rush+0.24 (13th)−0.19 (137th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.82 (6th)+0.11 (128th)
EPA per play allowed+0.13 (90th)−0.12 (4th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.36 (118th)−0.04 (8th)
EPA per rush allowed−0.03 (32nd)−0.06 (20th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.45 (86th)+0.13 (9th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, South Carolina or Oklahoma?

South Carolina outscores FBS opponents by 10.8 a game, and Oklahoma by 3.9. South Carolina's offense ranks 21st in scoring, and the Oklahoma defense it faces ranks 24th in points allowed. Oklahoma's offense ranks 110th against South Carolina's 79th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.

South CarolinaOklahoma
Points scored36.1 (21st)21.6 (110th)
Points allowed25.3 (79th)17.7 (24th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

South Carolina's best matchup is its run game: its offense ranks 5th in yards per carry, and Oklahoma's defense ranks 49th in yards per carry allowed. Oklahoma has no clear edge here. Its best is success rate, 111th, against a defense ranked 69th in success rate allowed.

South CarolinaOklahoma
Pass yards / game244.3 (53rd)229.9 (70th)
Rush yards / game223.4 (17th)121.1 (124th)
Yards per play6.81 (24th)5.73 (100th)
Yards per carry6.49 (5th)3.98 (129th)
Yards per attempt7.60 (70th)8.04 (49th)
Completion %64.0% (65th)69.0% (36th)
Success rate48.4% (27th)39.4% (111th)
Explosive play rate13.7% (37th)9.3% (123rd)
3rd down conversion48.0% (18th)36.8% (90th)
Sack rate (taken)6.3% (88th)7.4% (105th)
INT rate (thrown)2.2% (64th)4.0% (122nd)
SUPLEX56.7% (66th)46.0% (126th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

South Carolina's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 32nd in yards per carry allowed, and Oklahoma's offense is bottom-20 in yards per carry (129th). That's a mismatch. Oklahoma's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 5th in sack rate, and South Carolina's offense is middle of the pack at avoiding sacks (88th). That's a mismatch.

South CarolinaOklahoma
Pass yards allowed / game225.6 (94th)158.9 (8th)
Rush yards allowed / game128.1 (37th)133.6 (45th)
Yards per play allowed5.47 (51st)5.03 (18th)
Yards per carry allowed4.21 (32nd)4.54 (49th)
Yards per attempt allowed7.11 (71st)6.21 (31st)
Success rate allowed41.9% (69th)32.9% (6th)
Explosive plays allowed10.6% (59th)9.1% (18th)
3rd downs allowed35.8% (48th)25.3% (3rd)
Sack rate (generated)7.5% (38th)10.9% (5th)
INT rate (generated)1.8% (92nd)2.2% (77th)
SUPLEX allowed54.0% (70th)43.7% (11th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

South Carolina is −0.4 in turnover margin a game and Oklahoma is −1.0. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 3-point edge for South Carolina. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it.

South CarolinaOklahoma
Interceptions thrown / game0.71 (59th)1.14 (121st)
Fumbles lost / game0.57 (76th)1.00 (127th)
Giveaways / game1.29 (71st)2.14 (132nd)
Interceptions / game0.57 (84th)0.57 (84th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.29 (94th)0.57 (49th)
Takeaways / game0.86 (107th)1.14 (66th)
Turnover margin / game-0.4 (100th)-1.0 (126th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

South Carolina has the more talented roster (15th in the 247Sports talent composite; Oklahoma is 17th). But Oklahoma plays further above its talent: −1.5 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to South Carolina's −1.6.

South CarolinaOklahoma
Talent composite862.9 (15th)851.1 (17th)
Blue-chip ratio52.5% (14th)53.0% (12th)
Players on roster110 (75th)110 (75th)
Rated by 247Sports80 (60th)83 (47th)
5-star players4 (11th)4 (11th)
4-star players38 (16th)40 (15th)
3-star players36 (124th)37 (123rd)
Below 3-star2 (68th)2 (68th)
2026 transfers in28 (41st)18 (97th)
Transfer share35.0% (45th)21.7% (99th)
SP+ vs. talent-1.6 (73rd)-1.5 (72nd)
Returning production69.0% (24th)63.2% (38th)
Returning passing production65.4% (60th)92.1% (41st)
Returning rushing production80.1% (40th)121.6% (12th)
Returning receiving production67.2% (20th)41.6% (62nd)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)14 (14th)15 (15th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes17.5 (18th)11.0 (11th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

Oklahoma's roster is valued at $32.6M, South Carolina's at $23.2M. Dollar for dollar, South Carolina plays better: +2.5 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −5.5 for Oklahoma.

South CarolinaOklahoma
Roster value$23.2M (30th)$32.6M (14th)
Roster cost per win$5.8M (43rd)$8.1M (59th)
Projected wins per $1M0.29 (31st)0.18 (62nd)
SP+ vs. payroll+2.5 (26th)-5.5 (55th)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

South Carolina is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+1.1). Oklahoma is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−1.4).

South CarolinaOklahoma
BAWA (total)+0.5 (57th)+0.5 (57th)
Schedule BAWA-0.5 (113th)-1.4 (134th)
Roster BAWA+1.1 (16th)+1.2 (15th)
Coach BAWA+0.1 (62nd)+0.1 (62nd)
Luck BAWA-0.3 (86th)+0.6 (33rd)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

South Carolina at Oklahoma: questions people ask

Who will win South Carolina at Oklahoma?

Big Al picks Oklahoma, 58% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Oklahoma's best matchup is its pass rush, 5th in sack rate, against South Carolina's pass protection at 88th.

When and where is South Carolina at Oklahoma?

Sat, Oct 31, 4:15 PM ET at Memorial Stadium (Norman, OK), on SEC Network.

What's the line for South Carolina at Oklahoma?

DraftKings has Oklahoma −4.5, total 44.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the South Carolina–Oklahoma series record?

It's tied 1–1. Last meeting: Oklahoma won 26–7 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in South Carolina at Oklahoma?

South Carolina's is Lanorris Sellers (1,594 passing yards this season); Oklahoma's is John Mateer (1,603 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

South Carolina and Oklahoma: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.