This week's picks

Missouri vs. Arkansas Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Missouri at Arkansas

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 7:45 PM ET, Razorback Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Missouri, 75% to win.

The game

RivalryBattle Line Rivalry
KickoffSat, Oct 31, 7:45 PM ET
TVSEC Network
WhereRazorback Stadium
Weather71°, wind 8 mph
LineMissouri −10, total 49.5
Line movementOpened Missouri −10.5; moved 0.5 points toward Arkansas. Total opened 48.5, up 1.
SeriesMissouri leads 13–4
Last meetingMissouri 31–17 in 2025

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Missouri by 12.181%52
PRIMEMissouri by 7.771%
EloMissouri73%
The lineMissouri −10, opened −10.549.5, opened 48.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Missouri or Arkansas?

Big Al's pick: Missouri. 75% to win

Which matchups decide Missouri vs. Arkansas?

All three ratings favor Missouri, by 7.7 to 12.1 points. Missouri's best matchup is its early-down defense, 16th in SUPLEX allowed, against Arkansas' early-down offense at 120th. Arkansas' way back in is its ball security, 36th in interceptions thrown per pass, against Missouri's takeaway defense at 67th.

Missouri with the ball

Arkansas with the ball

Who's out for Missouri and Arkansas?

Missouri

Arkansas

How Missouri and Arkansas compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Missouri lands in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Arkansas in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Missouri is ahead on offense, 30.9 (42nd) to Arkansas' 27.7 (60th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 16.5 (11th) to Arkansas' 28.3 (85th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Missouri lands in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Arkansas in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Missouri is ahead on offense, 30.9 (42nd) to Arkansas' 27.7 (60th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 16.5 (11th) to Arkansas' 28.3 (85th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Missouri30.9 (42nd)16.5 (11th)
Arkansas27.7 (60th)28.3 (85th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Missouri lands in the defense carries it corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense); Arkansas in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense). Missouri is ahead on offense, 53.3% (89th) to Arkansas' 48.4% (120th) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 44.1% (16th) to Arkansas' 61.4% (116th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Missouri lands in the defense carries it corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense); Arkansas in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense). Missouri is ahead on offense, 53.3% (89th) to Arkansas' 48.4% (120th) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 44.1% (16th) to Arkansas' 61.4% (116th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Missouri53.3% (89th)44.1% (16th)
Arkansas48.4% (120th)61.4% (116th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Missouri lands in the boom or bust corner (better than average at hitting big plays, below it at staying on schedule); Arkansas in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). Arkansas is slightly better at staying on schedule, 41.1% (91st) to Missouri's 40.9% (95th) in success rate. Missouri is better at hitting big plays, 14.2% (29th) to Arkansas' 9.2% (125th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Missouri lands in the boom or bust corner (better than average at hitting big plays, below it at staying on schedule); Arkansas in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). Arkansas is slightly better at staying on schedule, 41.1% (91st) to Missouri's 40.9% (95th) in success rate. Missouri is better at hitting big plays, 14.2% (29th) to Arkansas' 9.2% (125th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Missouri40.9% (95th)14.2% (29th)
Arkansas41.1% (91st)9.2% (125th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Missouri lands in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays); Arkansas in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Missouri is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 37.3% (36th) to Arkansas' 47.6% (121st) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 12.8% (101st) to Arkansas' 14.4% (120th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Missouri lands in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays); Arkansas in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Missouri is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 37.3% (36th) to Arkansas' 47.6% (121st) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 12.8% (101st) to Arkansas' 14.4% (120th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Missouri37.3% (36th)12.8% (101st)
Arkansas47.6% (121st)14.4% (120th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Missouri lands in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it); Arkansas in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it). Missouri is ahead running it, 4.8 (87th) to Arkansas' 4.1 (126th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 8.4 (40th) to Arkansas' 6.1 (116th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Missouri lands in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it); Arkansas in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it). Missouri is ahead running it, 4.89 (87th) to Arkansas' 4.10 (126th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 8.41 (40th) to Arkansas' 6.19 (116th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Missouri4.89 (87th)8.41 (40th)
Arkansas4.10 (126th)6.19 (116th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Missouri lands in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); Arkansas in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Missouri is ahead at converting third downs, 43.3% (51st) to Arkansas' 40.4% (70th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 37.4% (57th) to Arkansas' 46.8% (124th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Missouri lands in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); Arkansas in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Missouri is ahead at converting third downs, 43.3% (51st) to Arkansas' 40.4% (70th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 37.4% (57th) to Arkansas' 46.8% (124th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Missouri43.3% (51st)37.4% (57th)
Arkansas40.4% (70th)46.8% (124th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Missouri and Arkansas are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Missouri's and Arkansas' players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Missouri's Austin Simmons is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 46.0% passing success rate (49th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,786 passing yards (22nd). Arkansas' KJ Jackson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 46.0% passing success rate (50th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,478 passing yards (59th). Simmons has the edge on both.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑JacksonSimmons
Missouri's Austin Simmons is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 46.0% passing success rate (49th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,786 passing yards (22nd). Arkansas' KJ Jackson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 46.0% passing success rate (50th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,478 passing yards (59th). Simmons has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Austin Simmons, Missouri46.0% (49th)1,786 (22nd)
KJ Jackson, Arkansas46.0% (50th)1,478 (59th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Missouri's Jamal Roberts is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.3 yards per carry (135th of 360 running backs) and 34.4% rushing success rate (307th). Arkansas' Braylen Russell is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.6 yards per carry (324th of 360 running backs) and 42.1% rushing success rate (203rd). Roberts has the edge in yards per carry, Russell in rushing success rate.24681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑RussellRoberts
Missouri's Jamal Roberts is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.3 yards per carry (135th of 360 running backs) and 34.4% rushing success rate (307th). Arkansas' Braylen Russell is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.6 yards per carry (324th of 360 running backs) and 42.1% rushing success rate (203rd). Roberts has the edge in yards per carry, Russell in rushing success rate.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Jamal Roberts, Missouri5.3 (135th)34.4% (307th)
Braylen Russell, Arkansas3.6 (324th)42.1% (203rd)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Missouri's Cayden Lee is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 19 explosive catches (5th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 670 receiving yards (16th). Missouri's Donovan Olugbode is in the role players corner, below average in both: 12 explosive catches (49th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 543 receiving yards (38th). Arkansas' Chris Marshall is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (53rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 601 receiving yards (29th). Arkansas' Ty Lockwood is in the role players corner, below average in both: 1 explosive catches (585th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 129 receiving yards (513th).-5051015202502004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑MarshallLockwoodLeeOlugbode
Missouri's Cayden Lee is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 19 explosive catches (5th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 670 receiving yards (16th). Missouri's Donovan Olugbode is in the role players corner, below average in both: 12 explosive catches (49th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 543 receiving yards (38th). Arkansas' Chris Marshall is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (53rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 601 receiving yards (29th). Arkansas' Ty Lockwood is in the role players corner, below average in both: 1 explosive catches (585th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 129 receiving yards (513th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Cayden Lee, Missouri19 (5th)670 (16th)
Donovan Olugbode, Missouri12 (49th)543 (38th)
Chris Marshall, Arkansas11 (53rd)601 (29th)
Ty Lockwood, Arkansas1 (585th)129 (513th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Missouri's top playmaker is Daeden Hopkins (3 sacks), 178th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Arkansas' top playmaker is Miguel Mitchell (1 sack, 2 INTs), 105th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Daeden Hopkins, Missouri3 sacksJason Dowell, Missouri2 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryMiguel Mitchell, Arkansas1 sack, 2 INTsQuincy Rhodes Jr., Arkansas2 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryDonta Simpson, Missouri2 sacksBen Bogle, Arkansas1 sack, 1 fumble recovery
Missouri's top playmaker is Daeden Hopkins (3 sacks), 178th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Arkansas' top playmaker is Miguel Mitchell (1 sack, 2 INTs), 105th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Daeden Hopkins, Missouri300178th
Jason Dowell, Missouri201179th
Miguel Mitchell, Arkansas120105th
Quincy Rhodes Jr., Arkansas201106th
Donta Simpson, Missouri200424th
Ben Bogle, Arkansas101272nd

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Missouri and Arkansas?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Missouri 14.6 points better (18th to 71st). PRIME also has Missouri ahead, by 10.2. Elo, which only sees results, also has Missouri ahead (24th to 65th).

MissouriArkansas
SP+ overall14.2 (18th)-0.4 (71st)
SP+ offense30.9 (42nd)27.7 (60th)
SP+ defense16.5 (11th)28.3 (85th)
SP+ special teams-0.2 (92nd)0.2 (42nd)
PRIME net9.9 (30th)-0.3 (72nd)
PRIME offense-0.11 (63rd)-0.49 (68th)
PRIME defense8.71 (14th)0.58 (62nd)
PRIME SOS1.6 (32nd)3.8 (12th)
PRIME SOR1.8 (22nd)0.1 (66th)
Elo1747 (24th)1515 (65th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Missouri's offense ranks 46th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Arkansas defense it faces ranks 98th in EPA per play allowed. Arkansas' offense ranks 79th against Missouri's 25th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Missouri's offense against Arkansas' defense. The biggest edge on the board is Missouri's passing game: 27th in adjusted EPA per pass, against Arkansas' 84th-ranked defense. Adjust for opponents and Arkansas' offense climbs from 107th to 79th in EPA per play: it has done its work against good defenses.

MissouriArkansas
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.13 (46th)+0.09 (79th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.26 (27th)+0.17 (83rd)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.06 (74th)+0.04 (95th)
Success rate (adjusted)39.0% (102nd)42.9% (55th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)44.5% (112th)49.5% (32nd)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)29.4% (93rd)28.0% (115th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.95 (39th)0.92 (103rd)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.81 (113th)2.88 (95th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.27 (32nd)0.95 (122nd)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.04 (25th)+0.14 (98th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.15 (45th)+0.22 (84th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.01 (27th)+0.11 (111th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)36.0% (9th)42.9% (87th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.94 (75th)0.94 (70th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)2.75 (17th)3.05 (97th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)0.94 (15th)1.14 (75th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Missouri or Arkansas?

Missouri is better throwing (24th in EPA per pass) than running (101st). Arkansas' pass defense ranks 93rd, so that's a mismatch. Arkansas is better throwing (82nd in EPA per pass) than running (121st). Missouri's pass defense ranks 42nd, so the defense has the better of it. On third down, Arkansas has the edge: its offense ranks 56th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 119th.

MissouriArkansas
EPA per play+0.17 (55th)+0.05 (107th)
EPA per pass+0.39 (24th)+0.18 (82nd)
EPA per rush+0.03 (101st)−0.02 (121st)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.57 (39th)+0.51 (56th)
EPA per play allowed+0.01 (28th)+0.20 (117th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.09 (42nd)+0.24 (93rd)
EPA per rush allowed−0.02 (37th)+0.23 (130th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.59 (119th)+0.45 (86th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Missouri or Arkansas?

Missouri outscores FBS opponents by 11.5 a game, and Arkansas is outscored by 5.7. Missouri's offense ranks 54th in scoring, and the Arkansas defense it faces ranks 96th in points allowed. Arkansas' offense ranks 114th against Missouri's 31st-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Missouri's offense against Arkansas' defense.

MissouriArkansas
Points scored31.1 (54th)21.0 (114th)
Points allowed19.6 (31st)26.7 (96th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Missouri's best matchup is big plays: its offense ranks 29th in explosive play rate, and Arkansas' defense ranks 120th in explosive plays allowed. That's a mismatch. Arkansas has no clear edge here. Its best is 3rd down conversion rate, 70th, against a defense ranked 57th in 3rd down conversions allowed.

MissouriArkansas
Pass yards / game271.6 (27th)238.9 (60th)
Rush yards / game161.4 (76th)126.6 (120th)
Yards per play6.53 (42nd)5.11 (127th)
Yards per carry4.89 (87th)4.10 (126th)
Yards per attempt8.41 (40th)6.19 (116th)
Completion %62.4% (75th)54.8% (112th)
Success rate40.9% (95th)41.1% (91st)
Explosive play rate14.2% (29th)9.2% (125th)
3rd down conversion43.3% (51st)40.4% (70th)
Sack rate (taken)3.0% (18th)5.3% (66th)
INT rate (thrown)0.9% (16th)1.5% (36th)
SUPLEX53.3% (89th)48.4% (120th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Missouri's defense is best placed to win on early downs: it ranks 16th in SUPLEX allowed, and Arkansas' offense is bottom-20 in SUPLEX (120th). That's a mismatch.

MissouriArkansas
Pass yards allowed / game228.0 (99th)214.6 (73rd)
Rush yards allowed / game129.4 (39th)156.9 (78th)
Yards per play allowed5.43 (49th)6.91 (120th)
Yards per carry allowed4.40 (42nd)5.23 (94th)
Yards per attempt allowed6.73 (54th)9.51 (130th)
Success rate allowed37.3% (36th)47.6% (121st)
Explosive plays allowed12.8% (101st)14.4% (120th)
3rd downs allowed37.4% (57th)46.8% (124th)
Sack rate (generated)7.1% (49th)4.8% (103rd)
INT rate (generated)2.5% (67th)3.2% (44th)
SUPLEX allowed44.1% (16th)61.4% (116th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Missouri is +0.7 in turnover margin a game and Arkansas is +0.1. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 3-point edge for Missouri. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it.

MissouriArkansas
Interceptions thrown / game0.29 (17th)0.57 (40th)
Fumbles lost / game0.29 (20th)0.57 (76th)
Giveaways / game0.57 (7th)1.14 (53rd)
Interceptions / game0.86 (45th)0.71 (64th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.43 (68th)0.57 (49th)
Takeaways / game1.29 (54th)1.29 (54th)
Turnover margin / game+0.7 (18th)+0.1 (61st)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Missouri has the more talented roster (19th in the 247Sports talent composite; Arkansas is 36th). Missouri also plays further above its talent: +5.1 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Arkansas' −5.6.

MissouriArkansas
Talent composite808.4 (19th)745.5 (36th)
Blue-chip ratio39.6% (18th)25.3% (33rd)
Players on roster111 (67th)118 (25th)
Rated by 247Sports91 (19th)83 (47th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players36 (18th)21 (32nd)
3-star players51 (103rd)61 (66th)
Below 3-star4 (38th)1 (86th)
2026 transfers in30 (31st)43 (8th)
Transfer share33.0% (52nd)51.8% (18th)
SP+ vs. talent+5.1 (37th)-5.6 (102nd)
Returning production42.0% (62nd)14.5% (109th)
Returning passing production-2.3% (124th)18.7% (71st)
Returning rushing production77.5% (43rd)14.5% (100th)
Returning receiving production32.9% (76th)11.7% (120th)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)34 (34th)46 (46th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes27.0 (21st)32.8 (27th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

Missouri's roster is valued at $26.4M, Arkansas' at $23.4M. Missouri also plays better per dollar: +2.9 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −9.0 for Arkansas.

MissouriArkansas
Roster value$26.4M (21st)$23.4M (28th)
Roster cost per win$5.3M (32nd)$7.8M (57th)
Projected wins per $1M0.30 (30th)0.14 (68th)
SP+ vs. payroll+2.9 (23rd)-9.0 (63rd)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Missouri is +1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+1.0). Arkansas is −0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−0.9).

MissouriArkansas
BAWA (total)+1.5 (30th)-0.5 (89th)
Schedule BAWA-0.3 (105th)-0.9 (127th)
Roster BAWA+1.0 (18th)+0.4 (44th)
Coach BAWA+1.0 (28th)-0.5 (91st)
Luck BAWA-0.1 (75th)+0.5 (36th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Missouri at Arkansas: questions people ask

Who will win Missouri at Arkansas?

Big Al picks Missouri, 75% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Missouri's best matchup is its early-down defense, 16th in SUPLEX allowed, against Arkansas' early-down offense at 120th.

When and where is Missouri at Arkansas?

Sat, Oct 31, 7:45 PM ET at Razorback Stadium, on SEC Network.

What's the line for Missouri at Arkansas?

DraftKings has Missouri −10, total 49.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Missouri–Arkansas series record?

Missouri leads 13–4. Last meeting: Missouri won 31–17 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in Missouri at Arkansas?

Missouri's is Austin Simmons (1,786 passing yards this season); Arkansas' is KJ Jackson (1,478 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Missouri and Arkansas: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.