This week's picks

Mississippi State vs. Texas Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. Big Al's pick is the team at least two of them favor.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Mississippi State at Texas

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 7:30 PM ET, DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Texas, 88% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 7:30 PM ET
TVESPN
WhereDKR-Texas Memorial Stadium
Weather76°, cloudy, wind 3 mph
LineTexas −20.5, total 50.5
Line movementHasn't moved since it opened.
SeriesTexas leads 4–2
Last meetingTexas 45–38 in 2025
Mississippi State injuriesKamario Taylor (QB), out for season

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Texas by 16.989%56
PRIMETexas by 14.685%
EloTexas91%
The lineTexas −20.550.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Mississippi State or Texas?

Big Al's pick: Texas. 88% to win

Which matchups decide Mississippi State vs. Texas?

All three ratings favor Texas, by 14.6 to 16.9 points, and it isn't close. Texas' best matchup is its 3rd down offense, 53rd in 3rd down conversion, against Mississippi State's 3rd down defense at 113th. Mississippi State's way back in is its run defense, 44th in yards per carry allowed, against Texas' run game at 98th. We left out the edges built on Taylor, who's out.

Mississippi State with the ball

Texas with the ball

Who's out for Mississippi State and Texas?

Mississippi State

Texas

How Mississippi State and Texas compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Mississippi State lands in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Texas in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense). Texas is ahead on offense, 34.6 (16th) to Mississippi State's 31.9 (35th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 14.5 (7th) to Mississippi State's 26.3 (68th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Mississippi State lands in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Texas in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense). Texas is ahead on offense, 34.6 (16th) to Mississippi State's 31.9 (35th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 14.5 (7th) to Mississippi State's 26.3 (68th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Mississippi State31.9 (35th)26.3 (68th)
Texas34.6 (16th)14.5 (7th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Mississippi State lands in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Texas in the good on both sides corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense). Mississippi State is better on offense, 59.2% (42nd) to Texas' 57.7% (56th) in SUPLEX. Texas is better on defense, 38.9% (3rd) to Mississippi State's 57.8% (97th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Mississippi State lands in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Texas in the good on both sides corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense). Mississippi State is better on offense, 59.2% (42nd) to Texas' 57.7% (56th) in SUPLEX. Texas is better on defense, 38.9% (3rd) to Mississippi State's 57.8% (97th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Mississippi State59.2% (42nd)57.8% (97th)
Texas57.7% (56th)38.9% (3rd)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Mississippi State lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Texas in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays). Mississippi State is ahead at staying on schedule, 45.5% (49th) to Texas' 44.7% (61st) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 14.2% (31st) to Texas' 11.5% (87th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Mississippi State lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Texas in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays). Mississippi State is ahead at staying on schedule, 45.5% (49th) to Texas' 44.7% (61st) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 14.2% (31st) to Texas' 11.5% (87th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Mississippi State45.5% (49th)14.2% (31st)
Texas44.7% (61st)11.5% (87th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Mississippi State lands in the bend, don't break corner (better than average at limiting big plays, below it at keeping offenses behind schedule); Texas in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Texas is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 33.8% (8th) to Mississippi State's 46.2% (114th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 7.1% (6th) to Mississippi State's 10.8% (61st) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Mississippi State lands in the bend, don't break corner (better than average at limiting big plays, below it at keeping offenses behind schedule); Texas in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Texas is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 33.8% (8th) to Mississippi State's 46.2% (114th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 7.1% (6th) to Mississippi State's 10.8% (61st) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Mississippi State46.2% (114th)10.8% (61st)
Texas33.8% (8th)7.1% (6th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Mississippi State lands in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it); Texas in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). Mississippi State is better running it, 5.7 (35th) to Texas' 4.7 (98th) in yards per carry. Texas is better throwing it, 8.0 (48th) to Mississippi State's 7.5 (76th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Mississippi State lands in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it); Texas in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). Mississippi State is better running it, 5.70 (35th) to Texas' 4.78 (98th) in yards per carry. Texas is better throwing it, 8.05 (48th) to Mississippi State's 7.50 (76th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Mississippi State5.70 (35th)7.50 (76th)
Texas4.78 (98th)8.05 (48th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Mississippi State lands in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); Texas in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Texas is ahead at converting third downs, 42.9% (53rd) to Mississippi State's 39.2% (75th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 32.4% (26th) to Mississippi State's 45.1% (113th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Mississippi State lands in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); Texas in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Texas is ahead at converting third downs, 42.9% (53rd) to Mississippi State's 39.2% (75th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 32.4% (26th) to Mississippi State's 45.1% (113th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Mississippi State39.2% (75th)45.1% (113th)
Texas42.9% (53rd)32.4% (26th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Mississippi State and Texas are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Mississippi State's and Texas' players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Mississippi State's Taylor is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 46.9% passing success rate (42nd of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,466 passing yards (62nd). Texas' Brad Jackson is in the efficient on low volume corner, above average in passing success rate, below it in passing yards: 51.2% passing success rate (16th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,630 passing yards (36th). Jackson has the edge on both.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑TaylorJackson
Mississippi State's Taylor is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 46.9% passing success rate (42nd of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,466 passing yards (62nd). Texas' Brad Jackson is in the efficient on low volume corner, above average in passing success rate, below it in passing yards: 51.2% passing success rate (16th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,630 passing yards (36th). Jackson has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Taylor, Mississippi State46.9% (42nd)1,466 (62nd)
Brad Jackson, Texas51.2% (16th)1,630 (36th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Mississippi State's Fluff Bothwell is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.7 yards per carry (91st of 360 running backs) and 51.1% rushing success rate (54th). Texas' Raleek Brown is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.9 yards per carry (175th of 360 running backs) and 37.3% rushing success rate (273rd). Bothwell has the edge on both.4681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑BothwellBrown
Mississippi State's Fluff Bothwell is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.7 yards per carry (91st of 360 running backs) and 51.1% rushing success rate (54th). Texas' Raleek Brown is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.9 yards per carry (175th of 360 running backs) and 37.3% rushing success rate (273rd). Bothwell has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Fluff Bothwell, Mississippi State5.7 (91st)51.1% (54th)
Raleek Brown, Texas4.9 (175th)37.3% (273rd)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Mississippi State's Anthony Evans III is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 17 explosive catches (12th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 653 receiving yards (19th). Mississippi State's Sanfrisco Magee is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (99th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 360 receiving yards (129th). Texas' Ryan Wingo is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (69th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 464 receiving yards (61st). Texas' Chris Dawn Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (177th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 400 receiving yards (100th).5101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑Evans IIIMageeDawn Jr.Wingo
Mississippi State's Anthony Evans III is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 17 explosive catches (12th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 653 receiving yards (19th). Mississippi State's Sanfrisco Magee is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (99th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 360 receiving yards (129th). Texas' Ryan Wingo is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (69th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 464 receiving yards (61st). Texas' Chris Dawn Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (177th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 400 receiving yards (100th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Anthony Evans III, Mississippi State17 (12th)653 (19th)
Sanfrisco Magee, Mississippi State9 (99th)360 (129th)
Ryan Wingo, Texas11 (69th)464 (61st)
Chris Dawn Jr., Texas7 (177th)400 (100th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Mississippi State's top playmaker is Jaray Bledsoe (2 sacks), 420th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Texas' top playmaker is Colin Simmons (8 sacks, 1 fumble recovery), 1st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Colin Simmons, Texas8 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryRasheem Biles, Texas1 sack, 3 INTsJaray Bledsoe, Mississippi State2 sacksKendel Dolby, Mississippi State2 fumble recoveriesMarcus Williams, Mississippi State2 sacksGraceson Littleton, Texas1 INT, 1 fumble recovery
Mississippi State's top playmaker is Jaray Bledsoe (2 sacks), 420th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Texas' top playmaker is Colin Simmons (8 sacks, 1 fumble recovery), 1st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Colin Simmons, Texas8011st
Rasheem Biles, Texas13084th
Jaray Bledsoe, Mississippi State200420th
Kendel Dolby, Mississippi State002421st
Marcus Williams, Mississippi State200422nd
Graceson Littleton, Texas011522nd

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Mississippi State and Texas?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Texas 14.4 points better (8th to 52nd). PRIME also has Texas ahead, by 12.1. Elo, which only sees results, also has Texas ahead (9th to 58th).

Mississippi StateTexas
SP+ overall6.0 (52nd)20.4 (8th)
SP+ offense31.9 (35th)34.6 (16th)
SP+ defense26.3 (68th)14.5 (7th)
SP+ special teams0.4 (11th)0.3 (28th)
PRIME net10.8 (27th)22.9 (4th)
PRIME offense10.17 (14th)5.75 (33rd)
PRIME defense-0.03 (67th)16.70 (1st)
PRIME SOS6.7 (6th)8.0 (1st)
PRIME SOR1.6 (28th)2.8 (9th)
Elo1555 (58th)1902 (9th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Mississippi State's offense ranks 27th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Texas defense it faces ranks 12th in EPA per play allowed. Texas' offense ranks 78th against Mississippi State's 75th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Texas' efficiency: 45th in adjusted success rate, against Mississippi State's 82nd-ranked defense. Adjust for opponents and Mississippi State's offense climbs from 67th to 27th in EPA per play: it has done its work against good defenses.

Mississippi StateTexas
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.17 (27th)+0.09 (78th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.23 (41st)+0.21 (54th)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.12 (25th)+0.05 (87th)
Success rate (adjusted)48.2% (11th)43.6% (45th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)51.7% (12th)47.6% (50th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)32.2% (34th)31.6% (45th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.94 (66th)0.91 (113th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)3.10 (25th)2.87 (98th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.31 (24th)1.04 (99th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.11 (75th)−0.00 (12th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.21 (78th)+0.09 (13th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.04 (50th)−0.02 (11th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)42.6% (82nd)33.0% (1st)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.89 (6th)0.91 (23rd)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.03 (94th)2.67 (7th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)0.96 (19th)1.01 (37th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Mississippi State or Texas?

Mississippi State is about as good throwing (63rd in EPA per pass) as running (60th). Texas is better throwing (76th in EPA per pass) than running (111th). Mississippi State's pass defense ranks 103rd, so that's an edge. On third down, Texas has the edge: its offense ranks 88th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 119th.

Mississippi StateTexas
EPA per play+0.14 (67th)+0.05 (107th)
EPA per pass+0.24 (63rd)+0.20 (76th)
EPA per rush+0.12 (60th)+0.01 (111th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.46 (69th)+0.41 (88th)
EPA per play allowed+0.14 (94th)0.00 (23rd)
EPA per pass allowed+0.28 (103rd)+0.05 (27th)
EPA per rush allowed−0.01 (44th)−0.06 (20th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.59 (119th)+0.37 (58th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Mississippi State or Texas?

Mississippi State outscores FBS opponents by 2.3 a game, and Texas by 11.6. Mississippi State's offense ranks 61st in scoring, and the Texas defense it faces ranks 29th in points allowed. Texas' offense ranks 57th against Mississippi State's 102nd-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Texas' offense against Mississippi State's defense.

Mississippi StateTexas
Points scored30.0 (61st)30.7 (57th)
Points allowed27.7 (102nd)19.1 (29th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Mississippi State has no clear edge here. Its best is yards per carry, 35th, against a defense ranked 21st in yards per carry allowed. Texas' best matchup is third downs: its offense ranks 53rd in 3rd down conversion rate, and Mississippi State's defense ranks 113th in 3rd down conversions allowed. That's a mismatch.

Mississippi StateTexas
Pass yards / game265.6 (35th)223.0 (77th)
Rush yards / game189.9 (41st)163.3 (75th)
Yards per play6.36 (55th)5.98 (86th)
Yards per carry5.70 (35th)4.78 (98th)
Yards per attempt7.50 (76th)8.05 (48th)
Completion %59.3% (87th)67.5% (40th)
Success rate45.5% (49th)44.7% (61st)
Explosive play rate14.2% (31st)11.5% (87th)
3rd down conversion39.2% (75th)42.9% (53rd)
Sack rate (taken)7.5% (106th)8.9% (117th)
INT rate (thrown)2.4% (74th)3.6% (115th)
SUPLEX59.2% (42nd)57.7% (56th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Mississippi State's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 44th in yards per carry allowed, and Texas' offense is bottom-40 in yards per carry (98th). Texas' defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 43rd in sack rate, and Mississippi State's offense is bottom-40 at avoiding sacks (106th). That's a mismatch.

Mississippi StateTexas
Pass yards allowed / game268.6 (126th)189.3 (34th)
Rush yards allowed / game135.1 (48th)127.0 (35th)
Yards per play allowed6.25 (96th)4.62 (7th)
Yards per carry allowed4.44 (44th)4.06 (21st)
Yards per attempt allowed8.39 (107th)5.50 (10th)
Success rate allowed46.2% (114th)33.8% (8th)
Explosive plays allowed10.8% (61st)7.1% (6th)
3rd downs allowed45.1% (113th)32.4% (26th)
Sack rate (generated)6.3% (66th)7.3% (43rd)
INT rate (generated)0.9% (133rd)2.5% (69th)
SUPLEX allowed57.8% (97th)38.9% (3rd)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: Mississippi State is −0.6 a game and Texas −0.4.

Mississippi StateTexas
Interceptions thrown / game0.86 (84th)1.00 (105th)
Fumbles lost / game0.57 (76th)0.57 (76th)
Giveaways / game1.43 (88th)1.57 (107th)
Interceptions / game0.29 (119th)0.86 (45th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.57 (49th)0.29 (94th)
Takeaways / game0.86 (107th)1.14 (66th)
Turnover margin / game-0.6 (113th)-0.4 (98th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Texas has the more talented roster (2nd in the 247Sports talent composite; Mississippi State is 20th). Texas also plays further above its talent: +0.2 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Mississippi State's −2.9.

Mississippi StateTexas
Talent composite804.5 (20th)985.2 (2nd)
Blue-chip ratio32.0% (24th)63.3% (7th)
Players on roster115 (40th)109 (82nd)
Rated by 247Sports97 (5th)90 (23rd)
5-star players0 (37th)15 (1st)
4-star players31 (19th)42 (13th)
3-star players66 (52nd)33 (128th)
Below 3-star0 (113th)0 (113th)
2026 transfers in28 (41st)22 (63rd)
Transfer share28.9% (70th)24.4% (90th)
SP+ vs. talent-2.9 (84th)+0.2 (64th)
Returning production33.9% (84th)72.1% (19th)
Returning passing production-0.2% (119th)85.4% (51st)
Returning rushing production87.3% (31st)126.4% (10th)
Returning receiving production27.9% (86th)55.0% (37th)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)23 (23rd)7 (7th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes26.5 (20th)4.2 (3rd)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

Texas' roster is valued at $47.5M, Mississippi State's at $21.2M. Dollar for dollar, Mississippi State plays better: −0.5 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −3.6 for Texas.

Mississippi StateTexas
Roster value$21.2M (42nd)$47.5M (1st)
Roster cost per win$5.3M (33rd)$9.5M (64th)
Projected wins per $1M0.26 (39th)0.18 (61st)
SP+ vs. payroll-0.5 (39th)-3.6 (50th)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Mississippi State is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−1.4). Texas is +1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+2.2). Mississippi State's record is running 1.2 wins ahead of its play on luck alone, so it's not as good as the record says.

Mississippi StateTexas
BAWA (total)+0.5 (57th)+1.5 (30th)
Schedule BAWA-1.4 (135th)-1.6 (137th)
Roster BAWA+0.8 (22nd)+2.2 (2nd)
Coach BAWA-0.1 (75th)+0.9 (32nd)
Luck BAWA+1.2 (7th)+0.0 (66th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Mississippi State at Texas: questions people ask

Who will win Mississippi State at Texas?

Big Al picks Texas, 88% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Texas' best matchup is its 3rd down offense, 53rd in 3rd down conversion, against Mississippi State's 3rd down defense at 113th.

When and where is Mississippi State at Texas?

Sat, Oct 31, 7:30 PM ET at DKR-Texas Memorial Stadium, on ESPN.

What's the line for Mississippi State at Texas?

DraftKings has Texas −20.5, total 50.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Mississippi State–Texas series record?

Texas leads 4–2. Last meeting: Texas won 45–38 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in Mississippi State at Texas?

Mississippi State's is Taylor (1,466 passing yards this season); Texas' is Brad Jackson (1,630 passing yards this season).

Who's out for Mississippi State at Texas?

Mississippi State: Taylor (QB), out for season.

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Mississippi State and Texas: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.