This week's picks

SMU vs. Syracuse Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

SMU at Syracuse

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 12:00 PM ET, JMA Wireless Dome.

Big Al's pick: SMU, 81% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 12:00 PM ET
TVESPN2
WhereJMA Wireless Dome
WeatherIndoors
LineSMU −10, total 58.5
Line movementOpened SMU −12.5; moved 2.5 points toward Syracuse. Total opened 55.5, up 3.
SeriesSMU leads 2–0
Last meetingSMU 31–18 in 2025

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+SMU by 13.784%56
PRIMESMU by 7.771%
EloSMU90%
The lineSMU −10, opened −12.558.5, opened 55.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, SMU or Syracuse?

Big Al's pick: SMU. 81% to win

Which matchups decide SMU vs. Syracuse?

All three ratings favor SMU, by 7.7 to 13.7 points, and it isn't close. SMU's best matchup is its run-stopping front, 29th in line yards allowed per carry, against Syracuse's offensive line at 131st. Syracuse's way back in is its run-stopping front, 34th in line yards allowed per carry, against SMU's offensive line at 98th.

SMU with the ball

Syracuse with the ball

Who's out for SMU and Syracuse?

SMU

Syracuse

How SMU and Syracuse compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? SMU lands in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Syracuse in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense). SMU is ahead on offense, 34.1 (19th) to Syracuse's 25.7 (77th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 20.4 (31st) to Syracuse's 28.3 (85th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
SMU lands in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Syracuse in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense). SMU is ahead on offense, 34.1 (19th) to Syracuse's 25.7 (77th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 20.4 (31st) to Syracuse's 28.3 (85th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
SMU34.1 (19th)20.4 (31st)
Syracuse25.7 (77th)28.3 (85th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? SMU lands in the good on both sides corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Syracuse in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). SMU is ahead on offense, 63.8% (21st) to Syracuse's 56.9% (63rd) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 52.0% (54th) to Syracuse's 58.4% (100th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
SMU lands in the good on both sides corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense); Syracuse in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). SMU is ahead on offense, 63.8% (21st) to Syracuse's 56.9% (63rd) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 52.0% (54th) to Syracuse's 58.4% (100th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
SMU63.8% (21st)52.0% (54th)
Syracuse56.9% (63rd)58.4% (100th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? SMU lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Syracuse in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays). SMU is ahead at staying on schedule, 49.6% (18th) to Syracuse's 44.7% (60th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 14.4% (27th) to Syracuse's 12.1% (73rd) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
SMU lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Syracuse in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays). SMU is ahead at staying on schedule, 49.6% (18th) to Syracuse's 44.7% (60th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 14.4% (27th) to Syracuse's 12.1% (73rd) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
SMU49.6% (18th)14.4% (27th)
Syracuse44.7% (60th)12.1% (73rd)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? SMU lands in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Syracuse in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays). SMU is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 36.6% (26th) to Syracuse's 40.6% (58th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 10.2% (46th) to Syracuse's 12.2% (90th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
SMU lands in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Syracuse in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays). SMU is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 36.6% (26th) to Syracuse's 40.6% (58th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 10.2% (46th) to Syracuse's 12.2% (90th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
SMU36.6% (26th)10.2% (46th)
Syracuse40.6% (58th)12.2% (90th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Both land in the air it out corner: better than average throwing it, below it running it. SMU is ahead running it, 4.9 (83rd) to Syracuse's 4.6 (104th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 9.6 (8th) to Syracuse's 7.9 (55th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Both land in the air it out corner: better than average throwing it, below it running it. SMU is ahead running it, 4.96 (83rd) to Syracuse's 4.66 (104th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 9.62 (8th) to Syracuse's 7.94 (55th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
SMU4.96 (83rd)9.62 (8th)
Syracuse4.66 (104th)7.94 (55th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Both land in the wins third down corner: better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down. SMU is slightly ahead at converting third downs, 46.3% (29th) to Syracuse's 45.1% (38th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 27.0% (5th) to Syracuse's 34.7% (41st) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Both land in the wins third down corner: better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down. SMU is slightly ahead at converting third downs, 46.3% (29th) to Syracuse's 45.1% (38th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 27.0% (5th) to Syracuse's 34.7% (41st) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
SMU46.3% (29th)27.0% (5th)
Syracuse45.1% (38th)34.7% (41st)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; SMU and Syracuse are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How SMU's and Syracuse's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? SMU's Kevin Jennings is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 53.6% passing success rate (9th of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,092 passing yards (11th). Syracuse's Steven Angeli is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 37.9% passing success rate (136th of 171 quarterbacks) and 992 passing yards (108th). Jennings has the edge on both.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,000Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑JenningsAngeli
SMU's Kevin Jennings is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 53.6% passing success rate (9th of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,092 passing yards (11th). Syracuse's Steven Angeli is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 37.9% passing success rate (136th of 171 quarterbacks) and 992 passing yards (108th). Jennings has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Kevin Jennings, SMU53.6% (9th)2,092 (11th)
Steven Angeli, Syracuse37.9% (136th)992 (108th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? SMU's Kendrick Raphael is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.4 yards per carry (116th of 360 running backs) and 48.7% rushing success rate (86th). Syracuse's Tylik Hill is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.3 yards per carry (129th of 360 running backs) and 46.0% rushing success rate (131st). Raphael has the edge on both.4681040%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑RaphaelHill
SMU's Kendrick Raphael is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.4 yards per carry (116th of 360 running backs) and 48.7% rushing success rate (86th). Syracuse's Tylik Hill is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.3 yards per carry (129th of 360 running backs) and 46.0% rushing success rate (131st). Raphael has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Kendrick Raphael, SMU5.4 (116th)48.7% (86th)
Tylik Hill, Syracuse5.3 (129th)46.0% (131st)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? SMU's Yamir Knight is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (87th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 394 receiving yards (106th). SMU's Jalen Cooper is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (235th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 269 receiving yards (239th). Syracuse's Umari Hatcher is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 19 explosive catches (6th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 887 receiving yards (4th). Syracuse's Daunte Bacheyie is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (239th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 286 receiving yards (209th).5101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑CooperKnightBacheyieHatcher
SMU's Yamir Knight is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (87th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 394 receiving yards (106th). SMU's Jalen Cooper is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (235th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 269 receiving yards (239th). Syracuse's Umari Hatcher is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 19 explosive catches (6th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 887 receiving yards (4th). Syracuse's Daunte Bacheyie is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (239th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 286 receiving yards (209th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Yamir Knight, SMU10 (87th)394 (106th)
Jalen Cooper, SMU6 (235th)269 (239th)
Umari Hatcher, Syracuse19 (6th)887 (4th)
Daunte Bacheyie, Syracuse6 (239th)286 (209th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? SMU's top playmaker is Marques White (4 sacks, 1 fumble recovery), 27th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Syracuse's top playmaker is Davien Kerr (1 sack, 3 INTs), 81st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Marques White, SMU4 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryDavien Kerr, Syracuse1 sack, 3 INTsBrandon Booker, SMU2 sacks, 1 INTChris D'Appolonia, Syracuse3 sacksKeyshawn Johnson, Syracuse2 sacks, 1 fumble recoveryAakil Washington, SMU1 sack, 1 fumble recovery
SMU's top playmaker is Marques White (4 sacks, 1 fumble recovery), 27th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Syracuse's top playmaker is Davien Kerr (1 sack, 3 INTs), 81st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Marques White, SMU40127th
Davien Kerr, Syracuse13081st
Brandon Booker, SMU210206th
Chris D'Appolonia, Syracuse300217th
Keyshawn Johnson, Syracuse201218th
Aakil Washington, SMU101491st

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate SMU and Syracuse?

On a neutral field, SP+ has SMU 16.2 points better (21st to 87th). PRIME also has SMU ahead, by 10.2. Elo, which only sees results, also has SMU ahead (21st to 104th).

SMUSyracuse
SP+ overall13.4 (21st)-2.8 (87th)
SP+ offense34.1 (19th)25.7 (77th)
SP+ defense20.4 (31st)28.3 (85th)
SP+ special teams-0.4 (113th)-0.2 (92nd)
PRIME net8.7 (33rd)-1.5 (77th)
PRIME offense5.76 (32nd)0.41 (60th)
PRIME defense2.91 (44th)-0.79 (75th)
PRIME SOS-4.0 (85th)-0.5 (49th)
PRIME SOR1.8 (22nd)-0.6 (86th)
Elo1759 (21st)1328 (104th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

SMU's offense ranks 42nd in adjusted EPA per play, and the Syracuse defense it faces ranks 71st in EPA per play allowed. Syracuse's offense ranks 106th against SMU's 81st-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is SMU's offense against Syracuse's defense. The biggest edge on the board is SMU's efficiency: 28th in adjusted success rate, against Syracuse's 90th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and SMU's defense falls from 56th to 81st in EPA per play allowed: a lot of that came against soft offenses.

SMUSyracuse
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.15 (42nd)+0.05 (106th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.29 (21st)+0.14 (101st)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.06 (78th)+0.06 (73rd)
Success rate (adjusted)45.7% (28th)41.8% (62nd)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)49.2% (33rd)47.4% (55th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)33.7% (13th)29.3% (97th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.91 (122nd)0.94 (60th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.87 (98th)2.68 (131st)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.15 (59th)1.09 (82nd)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.13 (81st)+0.11 (71st)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.19 (69th)+0.13 (34th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.08 (83rd)+0.11 (107th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)40.3% (46th)43.0% (90th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.96 (109th)0.97 (126th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)2.82 (29th)2.84 (34th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.28 (106th)1.32 (114th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, SMU or Syracuse?

SMU is better throwing (5th in EPA per pass) than running (81st). Syracuse's pass defense ranks 18th, so that's strength on strength. Syracuse is better running (65th in EPA per rush) than throwing (100th). SMU's run defense ranks 89th.

SMUSyracuse
EPA per play+0.24 (25th)+0.06 (104th)
EPA per pass+0.49 (5th)+0.11 (100th)
EPA per rush+0.08 (81st)+0.11 (65th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.72 (14th)+0.42 (85th)
EPA per play allowed+0.07 (56th)+0.08 (63rd)
EPA per pass allowed+0.08 (37th)+0.02 (18th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.10 (89th)+0.15 (109th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.43 (83rd)+0.27 (30th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, SMU or Syracuse?

SMU outscores FBS opponents by 15.3 a game, and Syracuse by 5.3. SMU's offense ranks 20th in scoring, and the Syracuse defense it faces ranks 93rd in points allowed. Syracuse's offense ranks 49th against SMU's 46th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is SMU's offense against Syracuse's defense.

SMUSyracuse
Points scored36.4 (20th)31.6 (49th)
Points allowed21.1 (46th)26.3 (93rd)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

SMU's best matchup is early downs: its offense ranks 21st in SUPLEX, and Syracuse's defense ranks 100th in SUPLEX allowed. That's a mismatch. Syracuse has no clear edge here. Its best is SUPLEX, 63rd, against a defense ranked 54th in SUPLEX allowed.

SMUSyracuse
Pass yards / game318.7 (6th)289.3 (17th)
Rush yards / game160.0 (78th)178.3 (55th)
Yards per play7.19 (13th)6.07 (73rd)
Yards per carry4.96 (83rd)4.66 (104th)
Yards per attempt9.62 (8th)7.94 (55th)
Completion %72.4% (18th)63.9% (66th)
Success rate49.6% (18th)44.7% (60th)
Explosive play rate14.4% (27th)12.1% (73rd)
3rd down conversion46.3% (29th)45.1% (38th)
Sack rate (taken)3.3% (24th)5.9% (81st)
INT rate (thrown)2.2% (59th)3.5% (114th)
SUPLEX63.8% (21st)56.9% (63rd)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

SMU's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 12th in sack rate, and Syracuse's offense is middle of the pack at avoiding sacks (81st). That's a mismatch.

SMUSyracuse
Pass yards allowed / game183.1 (25th)206.6 (60th)
Rush yards allowed / game134.0 (46th)154.4 (75th)
Yards per play allowed5.27 (33rd)5.70 (67th)
Yards per carry allowed4.81 (73rd)5.41 (105th)
Yards per attempt allowed6.25 (33rd)6.34 (35th)
Success rate allowed36.6% (26th)40.6% (58th)
Explosive plays allowed10.2% (46th)12.2% (90th)
3rd downs allowed27.0% (5th)34.7% (41st)
Sack rate (generated)9.3% (12th)6.2% (68th)
INT rate (generated)1.0% (128th)1.8% (97th)
SUPLEX allowed52.0% (54th)58.4% (100th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: SMU is −0.6 a game and Syracuse −0.3.

SMUSyracuse
Interceptions thrown / game0.71 (59th)1.29 (127th)
Fumbles lost / game0.57 (76th)0.14 (3rd)
Giveaways / game1.29 (71st)1.43 (88th)
Interceptions / game0.29 (119th)0.57 (84th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.43 (68th)0.57 (49th)
Takeaways / game0.71 (118th)1.14 (66th)
Turnover margin / game-0.6 (108th)-0.3 (89th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

SMU has the more talented roster (31st in the 247Sports talent composite; Syracuse is 35th). SMU also plays further above its talent: +7.0 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Syracuse's −8.0.

SMUSyracuse
Talent composite764.5 (31st)745.6 (35th)
Blue-chip ratio32.0% (23rd)20.9% (39th)
Players on roster107 (94th)110 (75th)
Rated by 247Sports75 (82nd)86 (36th)
5-star players1 (24th)2 (19th)
4-star players23 (29th)16 (41st)
3-star players51 (103rd)67 (45th)
Below 3-star0 (113th)1 (86th)
2026 transfers in17 (103rd)18 (97th)
Transfer share22.7% (94th)20.9% (105th)
SP+ vs. talent+7.0 (30th)-8.0 (116th)
Returning production56.9% (49th)35.0% (81st)
Returning passing production96.6% (27th)83.4% (52nd)
Returning rushing production0.9% (112th)-18.6% (128th)
Returning receiving production37.2% (69th)20.0% (103rd)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)32 (32nd)35 (35th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes60.5 (61st)50.8 (49th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

SMU's roster is valued at $22.4M, Syracuse's at $17.9M. SMU also plays better per dollar: +5.8 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −5.6 for Syracuse.

SMUSyracuse
Roster value$22.4M (33rd)$17.9M (65th)
Roster cost per win$3.7M (11th)$6.0M (45th)
Projected wins per $1M0.40 (10th)0.23 (50th)
SP+ vs. payroll+5.8 (14th)-5.6 (56th)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

SMU is +2.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (+0.8). Syracuse is −0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.1).

SMUSyracuse
BAWA (total)+2.5 (8th)-0.5 (89th)
Schedule BAWA+0.7 (56th)-0.2 (93rd)
Roster BAWA+0.7 (28th)+0.6 (33rd)
Coach BAWA+0.8 (35th)-1.1 (112th)
Luck BAWA+0.3 (48th)+0.1 (59th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

SMU at Syracuse: questions people ask

Who will win SMU at Syracuse?

Big Al picks SMU, 81% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. SMU's best matchup is its run-stopping front, 29th in line yards allowed per carry, against Syracuse's offensive line at 131st.

When and where is SMU at Syracuse?

Sat, Oct 31, 12:00 PM ET at JMA Wireless Dome, on ESPN2.

What's the line for SMU at Syracuse?

DraftKings has SMU −10, total 58.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the SMU–Syracuse series record?

SMU leads 2–0. Last meeting: SMU won 31–18 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in SMU at Syracuse?

SMU's is Kevin Jennings (2,092 passing yards this season); Syracuse's is Steven Angeli (992 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

SMU and Syracuse: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.