This week's picks

California vs. NC State Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

California at NC State

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 12:00 PM ET, Carter-Finley Stadium.

Big Al's pick: NC State, 77% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 12:00 PM ET
TVACC Network
WhereCarter-Finley Stadium
Weather68°, cloudy, wind 8 mph
LineNC State −7, total 56.5
Line movementOpened NC State −8.5; moved 1.5 points toward California.
SeriesNC State leads 1–0
Last meetingNC State 24–23 in 2024

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+NC State by 9.876%62
PRIMENC State by 9.876%
EloNC State84%
The lineNC State −7, opened −8.556.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, California or NC State?

Big Al's pick: NC State. 78% to win

Which matchups decide California vs. NC State?

All three ratings favor NC State, by 9.8 points. NC State's best matchup is its run game, 58th in yards per carry, against California's run defense at 132nd. California's way back in is its pass protection, 23rd in sacks allowed per dropback, against NC State's pass rush at 93rd.

California with the ball

NC State with the ball

Who's out for California and NC State?

California

NC State

How California and NC State compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? California lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); NC State in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). NC State is better on offense, 30.0 (46th) to California's 22.8 (101st) in SP+ offense. California is slightly better on defense, 30.5 (103rd) to NC State's 31.0 (107th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
California lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); NC State in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). NC State is better on offense, 30.0 (46th) to California's 22.8 (101st) in SP+ offense. California is slightly better on defense, 30.5 (103rd) to NC State's 31.0 (107th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
California22.8 (101st)30.5 (103rd)
NC State30.0 (46th)31.0 (107th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. NC State is better on offense, 54.2% (84th) to California's 45.1% (128th) in SUPLEX. California is better on defense, 56.5% (85th) to NC State's 66.3% (136th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. NC State is better on offense, 54.2% (84th) to California's 45.1% (128th) in SUPLEX. California is better on defense, 56.5% (85th) to NC State's 66.3% (136th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
California45.1% (128th)56.5% (85th)
NC State54.2% (84th)66.3% (136th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. NC State is ahead at staying on schedule, 43.2% (76th) to California's 36.4% (130th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 11.5% (87th) to California's 9.0% (128th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. NC State is ahead at staying on schedule, 43.2% (76th) to California's 36.4% (130th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 11.5% (87th) to California's 9.0% (128th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
California36.4% (130th)9.0% (128th)
NC State43.2% (76th)11.5% (87th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Both land in the leaky corner: below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. California is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 44.5% (95th) to NC State's 47.5% (120th) in success rate allowed, and slightly ahead at limiting big plays, 15.8% (134th) to NC State's 16.6% (136th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Both land in the leaky corner: below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. California is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 44.5% (95th) to NC State's 47.5% (120th) in success rate allowed, and slightly ahead at limiting big plays, 15.8% (134th) to NC State's 16.6% (136th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
California44.5% (95th)15.8% (134th)
NC State47.5% (120th)16.6% (136th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? California lands in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it); NC State in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it). NC State is ahead running it, 5.3 (58th) to California's 3.6 (133rd) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 6.9 (95th) to California's 6.1 (117th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
California lands in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it); NC State in the ground and pound corner (better than average running it, below it throwing it). NC State is ahead running it, 5.32 (58th) to California's 3.68 (133rd) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 6.98 (95th) to California's 6.18 (117th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
California3.68 (133rd)6.18 (117th)
NC State5.32 (58th)6.98 (95th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? California lands in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); NC State in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down). NC State is ahead at converting third downs, 45.6% (34th) to California's 34.1% (109th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 40.9% (89th) to California's 44.1% (108th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
California lands in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down); NC State in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down). NC State is ahead at converting third downs, 45.6% (34th) to California's 34.1% (109th) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 40.9% (89th) to California's 44.1% (108th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
California34.1% (109th)44.1% (108th)
NC State45.6% (34th)40.9% (89th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; California and NC State are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How California's and NC State's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? California's Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 40.6% passing success rate (107th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,612 passing yards (40th). NC State's CJ Bailey is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 47.5% passing success rate (35th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,512 passing yards (55th). Bailey has the edge in passing success rate, Sagapolutele in passing yards.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑SagapoluteleBailey
California's Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 40.6% passing success rate (107th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,612 passing yards (40th). NC State's CJ Bailey is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 47.5% passing success rate (35th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,512 passing yards (55th). Bailey has the edge in passing success rate, Sagapolutele in passing yards.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele, California40.6% (107th)1,612 (40th)
CJ Bailey, NC State47.5% (35th)1,512 (55th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? California's Ashten Emory is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.2 yards per carry (343rd of 360 running backs) and 39.2% rushing success rate (249th). NC State's Davion Gause is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.5 yards per carry (330th of 360 running backs) and 26.4% rushing success rate (350th). Gause has the edge in yards per carry, Emory in rushing success rate.24681020%30%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑EmoryGause
California's Ashten Emory is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.2 yards per carry (343rd of 360 running backs) and 39.2% rushing success rate (249th). NC State's Davion Gause is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.5 yards per carry (330th of 360 running backs) and 26.4% rushing success rate (350th). Gause has the edge in yards per carry, Emory in rushing success rate.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Ashten Emory, California3.2 (343rd)39.2% (249th)
Davion Gause, NC State3.5 (330th)26.4% (350th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? California's Chase Hendricks is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (148th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 506 receiving yards (49th). California's Ian Strong is in the role players corner, below average in both: 14 explosive catches (24th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 506 receiving yards (50th). NC State's Keenan Jackson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (100th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 403 receiving yards (98th). NC State's Preston Douglas is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (287th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 253 receiving yards (264th).05101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑HendricksStrongJacksonDouglas
California's Chase Hendricks is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (148th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 506 receiving yards (49th). California's Ian Strong is in the role players corner, below average in both: 14 explosive catches (24th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 506 receiving yards (50th). NC State's Keenan Jackson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (100th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 403 receiving yards (98th). NC State's Preston Douglas is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (287th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 253 receiving yards (264th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Chase Hendricks, California7 (148th)506 (49th)
Ian Strong, California14 (24th)506 (50th)
Keenan Jackson, NC State9 (100th)403 (98th)
Preston Douglas, NC State5 (287th)253 (264th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? California's top playmaker is Kingston Lopa (5 INTs), 17th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. NC State's top playmaker is Raul Aguirre Jr. (3 fumble recoveries), 181st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Kingston Lopa, California5 INTsAJ Tuitele, California3 sacksJD McKinley, California3 sacksRaul Aguirre Jr., NC State3 fumble recoveriesAdrian Farrow, NC State1 sack, 1 fumble recoveryElijah Satchell, NC State2 sacks
California's top playmaker is Kingston Lopa (5 INTs), 17th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. NC State's top playmaker is Raul Aguirre Jr. (3 fumble recoveries), 181st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Kingston Lopa, California05017th
AJ Tuitele, California300126th
JD McKinley, California300127th
Raul Aguirre Jr., NC State003181st
Adrian Farrow, NC State101429th
Elijah Satchell, NC State200430th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate California and NC State?

On a neutral field, SP+ has NC State 7.3 points better (74th to 101st). PRIME also has NC State ahead, by 7.3. Elo, which only sees results, also has NC State ahead (75th to 118th).

CaliforniaNC State
SP+ overall-8.2 (101st)-0.9 (74th)
SP+ offense22.8 (101st)30.0 (46th)
SP+ defense30.5 (103rd)31.0 (107th)
SP+ special teams-0.5 (124th)0.1 (54th)
PRIME net-10.2 (108th)-2.9 (83rd)
PRIME offense-6.46 (112th)2.36 (42nd)
PRIME defense-3.51 (98th)-6.02 (113th)
PRIME SOS1.7 (28th)-0.5 (49th)
PRIME SOR-0.7 (90th)-0.6 (86th)
Elo1236 (118th)1465 (75th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

California's offense ranks 131st in adjusted EPA per play, and the NC State defense it faces ranks 121st in EPA per play allowed. NC State's offense ranks 70th against California's 117th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is NC State's offense against California's defense. The biggest edge on the board is NC State's passing game: 38th in adjusted EPA per pass, against California's 77th-ranked defense. Adjust for opponents and NC State's offense falls from 31st to 70th in EPA per play: a lot of that came against soft defenses.

CaliforniaNC State
EPA per play (adjusted)−0.00 (131st)+0.10 (70th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.11 (121st)+0.23 (38th)
EPA per rush (adjusted)−0.02 (127th)+0.00 (124th)
Success rate (adjusted)37.4% (122nd)41.1% (77th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)42.6% (130th)45.1% (98th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)28.8% (105th)33.0% (22nd)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.93 (87th)0.91 (126th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.63 (133rd)2.85 (103rd)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)0.89 (129th)0.96 (121st)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.18 (117th)+0.20 (121st)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.21 (77th)+0.32 (130th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.18 (135th)+0.10 (102nd)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)41.1% (56th)44.9% (108th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.99 (134th)0.96 (113th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.20 (127th)2.98 (76th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.46 (132nd)1.30 (111th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, California or NC State?

California is better throwing (113th in EPA per pass) than running (128th). NC State's pass defense ranks 130th. NC State is better throwing (12th in EPA per pass) than running (103rd). California's pass defense ranks 72nd, so that's a mismatch. On third down, NC State has the edge: its offense ranks 3rd in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 97th.

CaliforniaNC State
EPA per play−0.02 (125th)+0.22 (31st)
EPA per pass+0.08 (113th)+0.44 (12th)
EPA per rush−0.06 (128th)+0.02 (103rd)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.44 (76th)+0.88 (3rd)
EPA per play allowed+0.18 (112th)+0.23 (120th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.18 (72nd)+0.41 (130th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.28 (133rd)+0.12 (94th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.48 (97th)+0.34 (51st)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, California or NC State?

California is outscored by 8.2 a game, and NC State by 4.2. California's offense ranks 101st in scoring, and the NC State defense it faces ranks 105th in points allowed. NC State's offense ranks 46th against California's 119th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is NC State's offense against California's defense.

CaliforniaNC State
Points scored23.4 (101st)32.3 (46th)
Points allowed31.6 (119th)28.1 (105th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

California has no clear edge here. Its best is explosive play rate, 128th, against a defense ranked 136th in explosive plays allowed. NC State's best matchup is its run game: its offense ranks 58th in yards per carry, and California's defense ranks 132nd in yards per carry allowed. That's a mismatch.

CaliforniaNC State
Pass yards / game295.0 (13th)261.8 (39th)
Rush yards / game93.0 (134th)168.5 (65th)
Yards per play5.20 (124th)6.06 (76th)
Yards per carry3.68 (133rd)5.32 (58th)
Yards per attempt6.18 (117th)6.98 (95th)
Completion %59.2% (88th)58.2% (93rd)
Success rate36.4% (130th)43.2% (76th)
Explosive play rate9.0% (128th)11.5% (87th)
3rd down conversion34.1% (109th)45.6% (34th)
Sack rate (taken)3.3% (23rd)4.7% (45th)
INT rate (thrown)1.3% (29th)1.3% (30th)
SUPLEX45.1% (128th)54.2% (84th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Neither defense ranks 25 spots ahead of the offense it faces in any of these, so expect both offenses to look like themselves.

CaliforniaNC State
Pass yards allowed / game215.0 (74th)226.2 (96th)
Rush yards allowed / game177.3 (104th)169.8 (96th)
Yards per play allowed7.20 (131st)7.05 (127th)
Yards per carry allowed6.11 (132nd)5.66 (116th)
Yards per attempt allowed9.01 (121st)9.11 (122nd)
Success rate allowed44.5% (95th)47.5% (120th)
Explosive plays allowed15.8% (134th)16.6% (136th)
3rd downs allowed44.1% (108th)40.9% (89th)
Sack rate (generated)6.4% (64th)5.1% (93rd)
INT rate (generated)3.7% (26th)2.0% (82nd)
SUPLEX allowed56.5% (85th)66.3% (136th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: California is +0.1 a game and NC State −0.1. Fumble recoveries are mostly luck, and NC State's takeaways lean on them (0.7 of 1.1 a game).

CaliforniaNC State
Interceptions thrown / game0.63 (52nd)0.57 (40th)
Fumbles lost / game0.38 (42nd)0.71 (99th)
Giveaways / game1.00 (37th)1.29 (71st)
Interceptions / game0.88 (38th)0.43 (105th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.25 (113th)0.71 (22nd)
Takeaways / game1.13 (81st)1.14 (66th)
Turnover margin / game+0.1 (63rd)-0.1 (76th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

NC State has the more talented roster (32nd in the 247Sports talent composite; California is 33rd). NC State also plays further above its talent: −6.8 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to California's −13.8.

CaliforniaNC State
Talent composite751.9 (33rd)757.1 (32nd)
Blue-chip ratio21.9% (37th)24.7% (34th)
Players on roster103 (119th)125 (8th)
Rated by 247Sports96 (6th)89 (29th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players21 (32nd)22 (30th)
3-star players68 (37th)67 (45th)
Below 3-star7 (14th)0 (113th)
2026 transfers in32 (24th)20 (76th)
Transfer share33.3% (50th)22.5% (97th)
SP+ vs. talent-13.8 (131st)-6.8 (109th)
Returning production58.3% (43rd)59.9% (41st)
Returning passing production88.7% (47th)93.1% (39th)
Returning rushing production0.0% (113th)101.5% (16th)
Returning receiving production43.0% (60th)26.0% (91st)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)56 (56th)49 (49th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes64.8 (67th)38.2 (32nd)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

NC State's roster is valued at $19.2M, California's at $19.1M. NC State also plays better per dollar: −5.2 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −12.4 for California.

CaliforniaNC State
Roster value$19.1M (60th)$19.2M (58th)
Roster cost per win$6.4M (48th)$6.4M (50th)
Projected wins per $1M0.17 (64th)0.30 (29th)
SP+ vs. payroll-12.4 (68th)-5.2 (53rd)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

California is −1.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−2.1). NC State is −0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.0). California's record is running 0.9 wins ahead of its play on luck alone, so it's not as good as the record says.

CaliforniaNC State
BAWA (total)-1.0 (109th)-0.5 (89th)
Schedule BAWA-0.6 (117th)+0.2 (80th)
Roster BAWA+0.9 (20th)+0.8 (24th)
Coach BAWA-2.1 (135th)-1.0 (109th)
Luck BAWA+0.9 (19th)-0.5 (100th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

California at NC State: questions people ask

Who will win California at NC State?

Big Al picks NC State, 78% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. NC State's best matchup is its run game, 58th in yards per carry, against California's run defense at 132nd.

When and where is California at NC State?

Sat, Oct 31, 12:00 PM ET at Carter-Finley Stadium, on ACC Network.

What's the line for California at NC State?

DraftKings has NC State −7, total 56.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the California–NC State series record?

NC State leads 1–0. Last meeting: NC State won 24–23 in 2024.

Who are the quarterbacks in California at NC State?

California's is Jaron-Keawe Sagapolutele (1,612 passing yards this season); NC State's is CJ Bailey (1,512 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

California and NC State: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.