This week's picks

Clemson vs. Florida State Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Clemson at Florida State

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 7:00 PM ET, Doak Campbell Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Florida State, 68% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 7:00 PM ET
TVACC Network
WhereDoak Campbell Stadium
Weather75°, cloudy, wind 8 mph
LineFlorida State −6, total 49.5
Line movementOpened Clemson −1.5; moved 7.5 points toward Florida State. Total opened 51.5, down 2.
SeriesFlorida State leads 21–17
Last meetingClemson 24–10 in 2025

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Florida State by 3.660%51
PRIMEFlorida State by 9.475%
EloFlorida State68%
The lineFlorida State −6, opened Clemson −1.549.5, opened 51.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Clemson or Florida State?

Big Al's pick: Florida State. 68% to win

Which matchups decide Clemson vs. Florida State?

All three ratings favor Florida State, by 3.6 to 9.4 points. Florida State's best matchup is its offensive line, 4th in line yards per carry, against Clemson's run-stopping front at 130th. Clemson's way back in is its pass rush, 6th in sack rate, against Florida State's pass protection at 110th.

Clemson with the ball

Florida State with the ball

Who's out for Clemson and Florida State?

Clemson

Florida State

How Clemson and Florida State compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Clemson lands in the defense first corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense); Florida State in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Florida State is better on offense, 32.7 (32nd) to Clemson's 23.3 (96th) in SP+ offense. Clemson is better on defense, 19.0 (24th) to Florida State's 27.1 (76th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Clemson lands in the defense first corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense); Florida State in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Florida State is better on offense, 32.7 (32nd) to Clemson's 23.3 (96th) in SP+ offense. Clemson is better on defense, 19.0 (24th) to Florida State's 27.1 (76th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Clemson23.3 (96th)19.0 (24th)
Florida State32.7 (32nd)27.1 (76th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Clemson lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); Florida State in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Florida State is better on offense, 58.8% (44th) to Clemson's 45.3% (127th) in SUPLEX. Clemson is better on defense, 60.3% (110th) to Florida State's 62.8% (123rd) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Clemson lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); Florida State in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Florida State is better on offense, 58.8% (44th) to Clemson's 45.3% (127th) in SUPLEX. Clemson is better on defense, 60.3% (110th) to Florida State's 62.8% (123rd) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Clemson45.3% (127th)60.3% (110th)
Florida State58.8% (44th)62.8% (123rd)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Clemson lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Florida State in the boom or bust corner (better than average at hitting big plays, below it at staying on schedule). Florida State is ahead at staying on schedule, 42.5% (81st) to Clemson's 37.1% (123rd) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 14.5% (26th) to Clemson's 9.5% (121st) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Clemson lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Florida State in the boom or bust corner (better than average at hitting big plays, below it at staying on schedule). Florida State is ahead at staying on schedule, 42.5% (81st) to Clemson's 37.1% (123rd) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 14.5% (26th) to Clemson's 9.5% (121st) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Clemson37.1% (123rd)9.5% (121st)
Florida State42.5% (81st)14.5% (26th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Clemson lands in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Florida State in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Clemson is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 40.3% (56th) to Florida State's 44.8% (100th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.3% (22nd) to Florida State's 13.9% (112th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Clemson lands in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Florida State in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Clemson is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 40.3% (56th) to Florida State's 44.8% (100th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.3% (22nd) to Florida State's 13.9% (112th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Clemson40.3% (56th)9.3% (22nd)
Florida State44.8% (100th)13.9% (112th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Clemson lands in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it); Florida State in the balanced and good corner (better than the FBS average running it and throwing it). Florida State is ahead running it, 5.4 (47th) to Clemson's 5.1 (72nd) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 8.4 (42nd) to Clemson's 5.5 (129th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Clemson lands in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it); Florida State in the balanced and good corner (better than the FBS average running it and throwing it). Florida State is ahead running it, 5.45 (47th) to Clemson's 5.11 (72nd) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 8.40 (42nd) to Clemson's 5.52 (129th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Clemson5.11 (72nd)5.52 (129th)
Florida State5.45 (47th)8.40 (42nd)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Clemson lands in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs); Florida State in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down). Florida State is better at converting third downs, 42.0% (60th) to Clemson's 34.8% (104th) in 3rd down conversion. Clemson is better at getting off the field on third down, 27.3% (7th) to Florida State's 45.2% (116th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Clemson lands in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs); Florida State in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down). Florida State is better at converting third downs, 42.0% (60th) to Clemson's 34.8% (104th) in 3rd down conversion. Clemson is better at getting off the field on third down, 27.3% (7th) to Florida State's 45.2% (116th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Clemson34.8% (104th)27.3% (7th)
Florida State42.0% (60th)45.2% (116th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Clemson and Florida State are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Clemson's and Florida State's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Clemson's Tait Reynolds is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 38.4% passing success rate (134th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,110 passing yards (103rd). Florida State's Ashton Daniels is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 40.1% passing success rate (116th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,634 passing yards (33rd). Daniels has the edge on both.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,0001,5002,0002,5003,000Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑ReynoldsDaniels
Clemson's Tait Reynolds is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 38.4% passing success rate (134th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,110 passing yards (103rd). Florida State's Ashton Daniels is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 40.1% passing success rate (116th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,634 passing yards (33rd). Daniels has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Tait Reynolds, Clemson38.4% (134th)1,110 (103rd)
Ashton Daniels, Florida State40.1% (116th)1,634 (33rd)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Clemson's Gideon Davidson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.4 yards per carry (119th of 360 running backs) and 40.0% rushing success rate (234th). Florida State's Ousmane Kromah is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.0 yards per carry (165th of 360 running backs) and 41.4% rushing success rate (210th). Davidson has the edge in yards per carry, Kromah in rushing success rate.4681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑DavidsonKromah
Clemson's Gideon Davidson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.4 yards per carry (119th of 360 running backs) and 40.0% rushing success rate (234th). Florida State's Ousmane Kromah is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.0 yards per carry (165th of 360 running backs) and 41.4% rushing success rate (210th). Davidson has the edge in yards per carry, Kromah in rushing success rate.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Gideon Davidson, Clemson5.4 (119th)40.0% (234th)
Ousmane Kromah, Florida State5.0 (165th)41.4% (210th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Clemson's Bryant Wesco Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (149th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 365 receiving yards (127th). Clemson's Tyler Brown is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (267th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 251 receiving yards (267th). Florida State's Duce Robinson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (79th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 388 receiving yards (110th). Florida State's Jayvan Boggs is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (56th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 327 receiving yards (159th).05101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑Wesco Jr.BrownRobinsonBoggs
Clemson's Bryant Wesco Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 7 explosive catches (149th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 365 receiving yards (127th). Clemson's Tyler Brown is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (267th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 251 receiving yards (267th). Florida State's Duce Robinson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (79th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 388 receiving yards (110th). Florida State's Jayvan Boggs is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (56th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 327 receiving yards (159th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Bryant Wesco Jr., Clemson7 (149th)365 (127th)
Tyler Brown, Clemson5 (267th)251 (267th)
Duce Robinson, Florida State10 (79th)388 (110th)
Jayvan Boggs, Florida State11 (56th)327 (159th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Clemson's top playmaker is Will Heldt (6 sacks), 5th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Florida State's top playmaker is Rylan Kennedy (6 sacks), 6th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Will Heldt, Clemson6 sacksRylan Kennedy, Florida State6 sacksElliot Washington II, Clemson3 INTsJaheim Lawson, Clemson2 sacksAshlynd Barker, Florida State2 INTsMandrell Desir, Florida State2 sacks
Clemson's top playmaker is Will Heldt (6 sacks), 5th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Florida State's top playmaker is Rylan Kennedy (6 sacks), 6th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Will Heldt, Clemson6005th
Rylan Kennedy, Florida State6006th
Elliot Washington II, Clemson030132nd
Jaheim Lawson, Clemson200305th
Ashlynd Barker, Florida State020335th
Mandrell Desir, Florida State200336th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Clemson and Florida State?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Florida State 1.1 points better (53rd to 55th). PRIME also has Florida State ahead, by 6.9. Elo, which only sees results, also has Florida State ahead (48th to 62nd).

ClemsonFlorida State
SP+ overall4.7 (55th)5.8 (53rd)
SP+ offense23.3 (96th)32.7 (32nd)
SP+ defense19.0 (24th)27.1 (76th)
SP+ special teams0.5 (4th)0.2 (42nd)
PRIME net0.0 (70th)6.9 (36th)
PRIME offense-6.28 (111th)7.23 (26th)
PRIME defense4.86 (28th)-1.35 (83rd)
PRIME SOS1.1 (37th)2.4 (20th)
PRIME SOR0.7 (49th)-0.1 (73rd)
Elo1532 (62nd)1609 (48th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Clemson's offense ranks 126th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Florida State defense it faces ranks 103rd in EPA per play allowed. Florida State's offense ranks 31st against Clemson's 37th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Florida State's offensive line in the run game: 4th in adjusted line yards per carry, against Clemson's 130th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and Florida State's defense climbs from 124th to 103rd in EPA per play allowed: it has done its work against good offenses.

ClemsonFlorida State
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.01 (126th)+0.17 (31st)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.08 (131st)+0.21 (51st)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.06 (75th)+0.14 (12th)
Success rate (adjusted)37.9% (120th)44.2% (38th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)43.4% (123rd)47.0% (65th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)28.8% (109th)33.0% (22nd)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.96 (29th)0.94 (52nd)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.88 (96th)3.25 (4th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.21 (43rd)1.19 (49th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.06 (37th)+0.15 (103rd)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.07 (5th)+0.24 (95th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.13 (117th)+0.09 (92nd)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)39.7% (37th)41.3% (64th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.92 (37th)0.96 (114th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.21 (130th)3.11 (115th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.03 (41st)1.44 (131st)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Clemson or Florida State?

Clemson is better running (75th in EPA per rush) than throwing (132nd). Florida State's run defense ranks 112th, so that's an edge. Florida State is better running (22nd in EPA per rush) than throwing (40th). Clemson's run defense ranks 94th, so that's a mismatch. On third down, Florida State has the edge: its offense ranks 16th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 41st.

ClemsonFlorida State
EPA per play−0.03 (127th)+0.22 (31st)
EPA per pass−0.05 (132nd)+0.32 (40th)
EPA per rush+0.09 (75th)+0.20 (22nd)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.12 (127th)+0.68 (16th)
EPA per play allowed+0.02 (32nd)+0.24 (124th)
EPA per pass allowed−0.03 (11th)+0.35 (117th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.12 (94th)+0.16 (112th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.30 (41st)+0.91 (137th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Clemson or Florida State?

Clemson outscores FBS opponents by 0.1 a game, and Florida State by 3.7. Clemson's offense ranks 111th in scoring, and the Florida State defense it faces ranks 103rd in points allowed. Florida State's offense ranks 49th against Clemson's 51st-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.

ClemsonFlorida State
Points scored21.4 (111th)31.6 (49th)
Points allowed21.3 (51st)27.9 (103rd)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Clemson's best matchup is its run game: its offense ranks 72nd in yards per carry, and Florida State's defense ranks 131st in yards per carry allowed. Florida State's best matchup is early downs: its offense ranks 44th in SUPLEX, and Clemson's defense ranks 110th in SUPLEX allowed. That's a mismatch.

ClemsonFlorida State
Pass yards / game201.5 (98th)236.4 (62nd)
Rush yards / game177.2 (57th)183.0 (49th)
Yards per play5.14 (126th)6.54 (40th)
Yards per carry5.11 (72nd)5.45 (47th)
Yards per attempt5.52 (129th)8.40 (42nd)
Completion %58.5% (91st)55.3% (110th)
Success rate37.1% (123rd)42.5% (81st)
Explosive play rate9.5% (121st)14.5% (26th)
3rd down conversion34.8% (104th)42.0% (60th)
Sack rate (taken)6.4% (89th)7.9% (110th)
INT rate (thrown)2.7% (89th)4.1% (125th)
SUPLEX45.3% (127th)58.8% (44th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Clemson's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 6th in sack rate, and Florida State's offense is bottom-40 at avoiding sacks (110th). That's a mismatch. Florida State's defense is best placed to get home: it ranks 37th in sack rate, and Clemson's offense is middle of the pack at avoiding sacks (89th).

ClemsonFlorida State
Pass yards allowed / game163.8 (13th)255.1 (116th)
Rush yards allowed / game116.3 (23rd)197.9 (121st)
Yards per play allowed5.20 (25th)6.97 (122nd)
Yards per carry allowed4.78 (68th)6.05 (131st)
Yards per attempt allowed6.22 (32nd)8.55 (111th)
Success rate allowed40.3% (56th)44.8% (100th)
Explosive plays allowed9.3% (22nd)13.9% (112th)
3rd downs allowed27.3% (7th)45.2% (116th)
Sack rate (generated)10.7% (6th)7.5% (37th)
INT rate (generated)1.9% (88th)1.9% (87th)
SUPLEX allowed60.3% (110th)62.8% (123rd)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Clemson is −0.6 in turnover margin a game and Florida State is −1.0. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 2-point edge for Clemson. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it.

ClemsonFlorida State
Interceptions thrown / game1.00 (105th)1.17 (126th)
Fumbles lost / game0.57 (76th)0.33 (41st)
Giveaways / game1.57 (107th)1.50 (101st)
Interceptions / game0.57 (84th)0.50 (99th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.43 (68th)0.00 (131st)
Takeaways / game1.00 (88th)0.50 (134th)
Turnover margin / game-0.6 (108th)-1.0 (126th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Clemson has the more talented roster (16th in the 247Sports talent composite; Florida State is 21st). But Florida State plays further above its talent: −2.8 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Clemson's −7.9.

ClemsonFlorida State
Talent composite862.9 (16th)800.2 (21st)
Blue-chip ratio49.4% (16th)36.0% (20th)
Players on roster119 (20th)106 (99th)
Rated by 247Sports85 (41st)86 (36th)
5-star players4 (11th)1 (24th)
4-star players38 (16th)30 (21st)
3-star players43 (116th)54 (95th)
Below 3-star0 (113th)1 (86th)
2026 transfers in11 (127th)23 (56th)
Transfer share12.9% (127th)26.7% (81st)
SP+ vs. talent-7.9 (115th)-2.8 (83rd)
Returning production41.4% (63rd)40.1% (66th)
Returning passing production14.1% (75th)12.5% (77th)
Returning rushing production-37.7% (132nd)28.2% (84th)
Returning receiving production71.2% (17th)65.2% (21st)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)20 (20th)16 (16th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes17.0 (17th)16.5 (15th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

Clemson's roster is valued at $25.6M, Florida State's at $24.0M. Dollar for dollar, Florida State plays better: −3.4 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −5.8 for Clemson.

ClemsonFlorida State
Roster value$25.6M (23rd)$24.0M (27th)
Roster cost per win$6.4M (49th)$8.0M (58th)
Projected wins per $1M0.25 (46th)0.25 (44th)
SP+ vs. payroll-5.8 (59th)-3.4 (49th)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Clemson is +0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+1.0). Florida State is −0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−0.7).

ClemsonFlorida State
BAWA (total)+0.5 (57th)-0.5 (89th)
Schedule BAWA-0.2 (98th)-0.7 (124th)
Roster BAWA+1.0 (17th)+0.7 (29th)
Coach BAWA-0.6 (92nd)-0.1 (73rd)
Luck BAWA+0.2 (54th)-0.3 (88th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Clemson at Florida State: questions people ask

Who will win Clemson at Florida State?

Big Al picks Florida State, 68% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Florida State's best matchup is its offensive line, 4th in line yards per carry, against Clemson's run-stopping front at 130th.

When and where is Clemson at Florida State?

Sat, Oct 31, 7:00 PM ET at Doak Campbell Stadium, on ACC Network.

What's the line for Clemson at Florida State?

DraftKings has Florida State −6, total 49.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Clemson–Florida State series record?

Florida State leads 21–17. Last meeting: Clemson won 24–10 in 2025.

Who are the quarterbacks in Clemson at Florida State?

Clemson's is Tait Reynolds (1,110 passing yards this season); Florida State's is Ashton Daniels (1,634 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Clemson and Florida State: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.