This week's picks

Purdue vs. Penn State Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Purdue at Penn State

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 4:15 PM ET, Beaver Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Penn State, 78% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 4:15 PM ET
TVBTN
WhereBeaver Stadium
Weather58°, fair, wind 5 mph
LinePenn State −7.5, total 54.5
Line movementOpened Penn State −8.5; moved 1 point toward Purdue. Total opened 52.5, up 2.
SeriesPenn State leads 17–3–1
Last meetingPenn State 49–10 in 2024

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Penn State by 11.680%58
PRIMEPenn State by 6.167%
EloPenn State92%
The linePenn State −7.5, opened −8.554.5, opened 52.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Purdue or Penn State?

Big Al's pick: Penn State. 80% to win

Which matchups decide Purdue vs. Penn State?

All three ratings favor Penn State, by 6.1 to 11.6 points. Penn State's best matchup is its passing game, 22nd in EPA per pass, against Purdue's pass defense at 132nd. Purdue's way back in is its early-down offense, 25th in SUPLEX, against Penn State's early-down defense at 87th.

Purdue with the ball

Penn State with the ball

Who's out for Purdue and Penn State?

Purdue

Penn State

How Purdue and Penn State compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Purdue lands in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Penn State in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense). Purdue is slightly better on offense, 30.0 (46th) to Penn State's 28.9 (53rd) in SP+ offense. Penn State is better on defense, 19.8 (27th) to Purdue's 30.4 (101st) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Purdue lands in the offense first corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Penn State in the complete teams corner (better than the FBS average on offense and on defense). Purdue is slightly better on offense, 30.0 (46th) to Penn State's 28.9 (53rd) in SP+ offense. Penn State is better on defense, 19.8 (27th) to Purdue's 30.4 (101st) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Purdue30.0 (46th)30.4 (101st)
Penn State28.9 (53rd)19.8 (27th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Purdue lands in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Penn State in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense). Purdue is better on offense, 62.2% (25th) to Penn State's 49.6% (112th) in SUPLEX. Penn State is better on defense, 56.6% (87th) to Purdue's 63.5% (128th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Purdue lands in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense); Penn State in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense). Purdue is better on offense, 62.2% (25th) to Penn State's 49.6% (112th) in SUPLEX. Penn State is better on defense, 56.6% (87th) to Purdue's 63.5% (128th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Purdue62.2% (25th)63.5% (128th)
Penn State49.6% (112th)56.6% (87th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Purdue lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Penn State in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). Purdue is ahead at staying on schedule, 45.8% (45th) to Penn State's 42.0% (86th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 12.7% (53rd) to Penn State's 10.3% (114th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Purdue lands in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays); Penn State in the struggling corner (below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). Purdue is ahead at staying on schedule, 45.8% (45th) to Penn State's 42.0% (86th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 12.7% (53rd) to Penn State's 10.3% (114th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Purdue45.8% (45th)12.7% (53rd)
Penn State42.0% (86th)10.3% (114th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Purdue lands in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Penn State in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays). Penn State is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 39.6% (53rd) to Purdue's 46.0% (110th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 12.6% (99th) to Purdue's 18.2% (137th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Purdue lands in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Penn State in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays). Penn State is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 39.6% (53rd) to Purdue's 46.0% (110th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 12.6% (99th) to Purdue's 18.2% (137th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Purdue46.0% (110th)18.2% (137th)
Penn State39.6% (53rd)12.6% (99th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Both land in the air it out corner: better than average throwing it, below it running it. Purdue is ahead running it, 4.3 (120th) to Penn State's 3.9 (130th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 8.6 (33rd) to Penn State's 8.2 (44th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Both land in the air it out corner: better than average throwing it, below it running it. Purdue is ahead running it, 4.30 (120th) to Penn State's 3.98 (130th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 8.60 (33rd) to Penn State's 8.21 (44th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Purdue4.30 (120th)8.60 (33rd)
Penn State3.98 (130th)8.21 (44th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Purdue lands in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down); Penn State in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs). Purdue is better at converting third downs, 44.8% (41st) to Penn State's 37.2% (88th) in 3rd down conversion. Penn State is better at getting off the field on third down, 27.9% (9th) to Purdue's 45.7% (117th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Purdue lands in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down); Penn State in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs). Purdue is better at converting third downs, 44.8% (41st) to Penn State's 37.2% (88th) in 3rd down conversion. Penn State is better at getting off the field on third down, 27.9% (9th) to Purdue's 45.7% (117th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Purdue44.8% (41st)45.7% (117th)
Penn State37.2% (88th)27.9% (9th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Purdue and Penn State are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Purdue's and Penn State's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Purdue's Ryan Browne is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 47.6% passing success rate (33rd of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,834 passing yards (20th). Penn State's Rocco Becht is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 44.1% passing success rate (69th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,664 passing yards (28th). Browne has the edge on both.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑BechtBrowne
Purdue's Ryan Browne is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 47.6% passing success rate (33rd of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,834 passing yards (20th). Penn State's Rocco Becht is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 44.1% passing success rate (69th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,664 passing yards (28th). Browne has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Ryan Browne, Purdue47.6% (33rd)1,834 (20th)
Rocco Becht, Penn State44.1% (69th)1,664 (28th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Purdue's Fame Ijeboi is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.3 yards per carry (253rd of 360 running backs) and 42.1% rushing success rate (204th). Penn State's Carson Hansen is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.9 yards per carry (294th of 360 running backs) and 41.4% rushing success rate (211th). Ijeboi has the edge on both.24681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑HansenIjeboi
Purdue's Fame Ijeboi is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.3 yards per carry (253rd of 360 running backs) and 42.1% rushing success rate (204th). Penn State's Carson Hansen is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.9 yards per carry (294th of 360 running backs) and 41.4% rushing success rate (211th). Ijeboi has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Fame Ijeboi, Purdue4.3 (253rd)42.1% (204th)
Carson Hansen, Penn State3.9 (294th)41.4% (211th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Purdue's Asaad Waseem is in the role players corner, below average in both: 14 explosive catches (28th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 588 receiving yards (30th). Purdue's Xavier Townsend is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (232nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 374 receiving yards (120th). Penn State's Chase Sowell is in the role players corner, below average in both: 13 explosive catches (37th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 513 receiving yards (46th). Penn State's Koby Howard is in the role players corner, below average in both: 8 explosive catches (136th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 344 receiving yards (143rd).5101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑SowellHowardWaseemTownsend
Purdue's Asaad Waseem is in the role players corner, below average in both: 14 explosive catches (28th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 588 receiving yards (30th). Purdue's Xavier Townsend is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (232nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 374 receiving yards (120th). Penn State's Chase Sowell is in the role players corner, below average in both: 13 explosive catches (37th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 513 receiving yards (46th). Penn State's Koby Howard is in the role players corner, below average in both: 8 explosive catches (136th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 344 receiving yards (143rd).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Asaad Waseem, Purdue14 (28th)588 (30th)
Xavier Townsend, Purdue6 (232nd)374 (120th)
Chase Sowell, Penn State13 (37th)513 (46th)
Koby Howard, Penn State8 (136th)344 (143rd)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Purdue's top playmaker is Donovan Saunders (1 INT, 1 fumble recovery), 484th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Penn State's top playmaker is Tony Rojas (4 sacks, 2 INTs), 10th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Tony Rojas, Penn State4 sacks, 2 INTsJosiah Zayas, Penn State2 INTs, 1 fumble recoveryDonovan Saunders, Purdue1 INT, 1 fumble recoveryJohn Slaughter, Purdue1 INT, 1 fumble recoveryJojo Hayden, Purdue2 INTsBryson Williams, Penn State1 INT
Purdue's top playmaker is Donovan Saunders (1 INT, 1 fumble recovery), 484th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Penn State's top playmaker is Tony Rojas (4 sacks, 2 INTs), 10th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Tony Rojas, Penn State42010th
Josiah Zayas, Penn State021202nd
Donovan Saunders, Purdue011484th
John Slaughter, Purdue011485th
Jojo Hayden, Purdue020486th
Bryson Williams, Penn State0101234th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Purdue and Penn State?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Penn State 9.1 points better (36th to 69th). PRIME also has Penn State ahead, by 3.6. Elo, which only sees results, also has Penn State ahead (16th to 86th).

PurduePenn State
SP+ overall0.2 (69th)9.3 (36th)
SP+ offense30.0 (46th)28.9 (53rd)
SP+ defense30.4 (101st)19.8 (27th)
SP+ special teams0.5 (4th)0.2 (42nd)
PRIME net0.6 (65th)4.2 (49th)
PRIME offense6.74 (28th)-1.45 (77th)
PRIME defense-6.62 (120th)4.71 (30th)
PRIME SOS4.0 (10th)2.3 (23rd)
PRIME SOR0.2 (62nd)-0.1 (73rd)
Elo1423 (86th)1800 (16th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Purdue's offense ranks 30th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Penn State defense it faces ranks 38th in EPA per play allowed. Penn State's offense ranks 56th against Purdue's 120th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Penn State's offense against Purdue's defense. The biggest edge on the board is Penn State's passing game: 22nd in adjusted EPA per pass, against Purdue's 132nd-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and Penn State's defense climbs from 73rd to 38th in EPA per play allowed: it has done its work against good offenses.

PurduePenn State
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.17 (30th)+0.12 (56th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.26 (26th)+0.28 (22nd)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.07 (61st)+0.03 (110th)
Success rate (adjusted)43.8% (41st)41.3% (76th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)47.0% (62nd)45.7% (88th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)33.4% (18th)30.3% (73rd)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.96 (30th)0.91 (109th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.79 (118th)2.81 (114th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)1.13 (72nd)0.97 (118th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.19 (120th)+0.06 (38th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.32 (132nd)+0.09 (12th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.12 (113th)+0.11 (109th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)45.4% (112th)38.9% (29th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.95 (94th)0.99 (135th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.07 (105th)2.90 (51st)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.34 (119th)1.32 (116th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Purdue or Penn State?

Purdue is better throwing (24th in EPA per pass) than running (81st). Penn State's pass defense ranks 12th, so that's strength on strength. Penn State is better throwing (34th in EPA per pass) than running (124th). Purdue's pass defense ranks 133rd, so that's a mismatch. On third down, Penn State has the edge: its offense ranks 101st in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 136th.

PurduePenn State
EPA per play+0.22 (31st)+0.12 (76th)
EPA per pass+0.39 (24th)+0.35 (34th)
EPA per rush+0.08 (81st)−0.04 (124th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.56 (41st)+0.33 (101st)
EPA per play allowed+0.26 (130th)+0.10 (73rd)
EPA per pass allowed+0.43 (133rd)−0.01 (12th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.20 (127th)+0.25 (131st)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.87 (136th)+0.32 (47th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Purdue or Penn State?

Purdue is outscored by 1.0 a game, and Penn State by 9.8. Purdue's offense ranks 53rd in scoring, and the Penn State defense it faces ranks 27th in points allowed. Penn State's offense ranks 68th against Purdue's 122nd-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Penn State's offense against Purdue's defense.

PurduePenn State
Points scored31.3 (53rd)28.7 (68th)
Points allowed32.3 (122nd)18.9 (27th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Purdue's best matchup is early downs: its offense ranks 25th in SUPLEX, and Penn State's defense ranks 87th in SUPLEX allowed. That's a mismatch. Penn State's best matchup is third downs: its offense ranks 88th in 3rd down conversion rate, and Purdue's defense ranks 117th in 3rd down conversions allowed.

PurduePenn State
Pass yards / game282.4 (22nd)256.7 (41st)
Rush yards / game134.0 (109th)129.0 (116th)
Yards per play6.30 (57th)5.91 (89th)
Yards per carry4.30 (120th)3.98 (130th)
Yards per attempt8.60 (33rd)8.21 (44th)
Completion %68.3% (39th)65.8% (51st)
Success rate45.8% (45th)42.0% (86th)
Explosive play rate12.7% (53rd)10.3% (114th)
3rd down conversion44.8% (41st)37.2% (88th)
Sack rate (taken)6.1% (85th)4.8% (52nd)
INT rate (thrown)1.3% (28th)2.3% (65th)
SUPLEX62.2% (25th)49.6% (112th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Penn State's defense is best placed to get off the field on third down: it ranks 9th in 3rd down conversions allowed, and Purdue's offense is above average in 3rd down conversion rate (41st).

PurduePenn State
Pass yards allowed / game256.4 (119th)125.1 (1st)
Rush yards allowed / game163.9 (92nd)160.7 (82nd)
Yards per play allowed6.87 (118th)5.62 (59th)
Yards per carry allowed5.65 (115th)5.98 (128th)
Yards per attempt allowed8.27 (100th)5.47 (9th)
Success rate allowed46.0% (110th)39.6% (53rd)
Explosive plays allowed18.2% (137th)12.6% (99th)
3rd downs allowed45.7% (117th)27.9% (9th)
Sack rate (generated)3.6% (125th)4.8% (104th)
INT rate (generated)3.2% (41st)4.4% (13th)
SUPLEX allowed63.5% (128th)56.6% (87th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: Purdue is +0.6 a game and Penn State +0.6.

PurduePenn State
Interceptions thrown / game0.43 (26th)0.71 (59th)
Fumbles lost / game0.43 (53rd)0.29 (20th)
Giveaways / game0.86 (26th)1.00 (37th)
Interceptions / game1.00 (22nd)1.00 (22nd)
Fumbles recovered / game0.43 (68th)0.57 (49th)
Takeaways / game1.43 (39th)1.57 (27th)
Turnover margin / game+0.6 (26th)+0.6 (27th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Penn State has the more talented roster (26th in the 247Sports talent composite; Purdue is 55th). Penn State also plays further above its talent: +2.3 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Purdue's −2.0.

PurduePenn State
Talent composite698.3 (55th)774.0 (26th)
Blue-chip ratio14.0% (53rd)37.0% (19th)
Players on roster119 (20th)112 (58th)
Rated by 247Sports86 (36th)81 (56th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players12 (51st)30 (21st)
3-star players71 (23rd)50 (106th)
Below 3-star3 (53rd)1 (86th)
2026 transfers in29 (34th)39 (14th)
Transfer share33.7% (49th)48.1% (21st)
SP+ vs. talent-2.0 (78th)+2.3 (53rd)
Returning production47.5% (57th)7.6% (123rd)
Returning passing production97.0% (26th)3.3% (100th)
Returning rushing production60.6% (55th)-1.6% (119th)
Returning receiving production21.6% (98th)14.5% (114th)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)55 (55th)65 (65th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes62.8 (66th)27.2 (22nd)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

Penn State's roster is valued at $27.8M, Purdue's at $17.8M. Dollar for dollar, Purdue plays better: −2.4 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −3.1 for Penn State.

PurduePenn State
Roster value$17.8M (67th)$27.8M (17th)
Roster cost per win$5.9M (44th)$9.3M (63rd)
Projected wins per $1M0.21 (56th)0.29 (34th)
SP+ vs. payroll-2.4 (44th)-3.1 (48th)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Purdue is −0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (−1.0). Penn State is −0.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is luck (−1.4). Penn State's record is 1.4 wins worse than its play on bad luck, so it's better than the record says.

PurduePenn State
BAWA (total)-0.5 (89th)-0.5 (89th)
Schedule BAWA-1.0 (129th)-0.3 (101st)
Roster BAWA+0.3 (55th)+0.6 (32nd)
Coach BAWA-0.3 (84th)+0.6 (43rd)
Luck BAWA+0.6 (35th)-1.4 (132nd)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Purdue at Penn State: questions people ask

Who will win Purdue at Penn State?

Big Al picks Penn State, 80% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Penn State's best matchup is its passing game, 22nd in EPA per pass, against Purdue's pass defense at 132nd.

When and where is Purdue at Penn State?

Sat, Oct 31, 4:15 PM ET at Beaver Stadium, on BTN.

What's the line for Purdue at Penn State?

DraftKings has Penn State −7.5, total 54.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Purdue–Penn State series record?

Penn State leads 17–3–1. Last meeting: Penn State won 49–10 in 2024.

Who are the quarterbacks in Purdue at Penn State?

Purdue's is Ryan Browne (1,834 passing yards this season); Penn State's is Rocco Becht (1,664 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Purdue and Penn State: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.