This week's picks

Ohio State vs. USC Prediction and Pick, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Ohio State at USC

Week 9, Sat, Oct 31, 7:30 PM ET, Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum.

Big Al's pick: Ohio State, 76% to win.

The game

KickoffSat, Oct 31, 7:30 PM ET
TVNBC
WhereLos Angeles Memorial Coliseum
Weather66°, light rain, wind 8 mph
LineOhio State −6.5, total 51.5
Line movementOpened Ohio State −7.5; moved 1 point toward USC. Total opened 54.5, down 3.
SeriesUSC leads 13–10–1
Last meetingOhio State 24–7 in 2017
Ohio State injuriesJulian Sayin (QB), out indefinitely

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Ohio State by 11.980%57
PRIMEOhio State by 8.272%
EloOhio State82%
The lineOhio State −6.5, opened −7.551.5, opened 54.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Ohio State or USC?

Big Al's pick: Ohio State. 78% to win

Which matchups decide Ohio State vs. USC?

All three ratings favor Ohio State, by 8.2 to 11.9 points. Ohio State's best matchup is its run defense, 9th in yards per carry allowed, against USC's run game at 105th. USC's way back in is its pass protection, 30th in sacks allowed per dropback, against Ohio State's pass rush at 122nd. We left out the edges built on Sayin, who's out.

Ohio State with the ball

USC with the ball

Who's out for Ohio State and USC?

Ohio State

USC

How Ohio State and USC compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Both land in the complete teams corner: better than the FBS average on offense and on defense. Ohio State is slightly ahead on offense, 39.2 (4th) to USC's 36.6 (9th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 10.7 (1st) to USC's 22.4 (39th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Both land in the complete teams corner: better than the FBS average on offense and on defense. Ohio State is slightly ahead on offense, 39.2 (4th) to USC's 36.6 (9th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 10.7 (1st) to USC's 22.4 (39th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Ohio State39.2 (4th)10.7 (1st)
USC36.6 (9th)22.4 (39th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Both land in the good on both sides corner: better than the FBS average on offense and on defense. USC is slightly better on offense, 65.5% (16th) to Ohio State's 64.2% (18th) in SUPLEX. Ohio State is better on defense, 43.4% (9th) to USC's 50.3% (43rd) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Both land in the good on both sides corner: better than the FBS average on offense and on defense. USC is slightly better on offense, 65.5% (16th) to Ohio State's 64.2% (18th) in SUPLEX. Ohio State is better on defense, 43.4% (9th) to USC's 50.3% (43rd) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Ohio State64.2% (18th)43.4% (9th)
USC65.5% (16th)50.3% (43rd)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Both land in the efficient and explosive corner: better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. USC is slightly better at staying on schedule, 53.0% (4th) to Ohio State's 51.9% (8th) in success rate. Ohio State is better at hitting big plays, 15.4% (14th) to USC's 13.5% (38th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Both land in the efficient and explosive corner: better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. USC is slightly better at staying on schedule, 53.0% (4th) to Ohio State's 51.9% (8th) in success rate. Ohio State is better at hitting big plays, 15.4% (14th) to USC's 13.5% (38th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Ohio State51.9% (8th)15.4% (14th)
USC53.0% (4th)13.5% (38th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Both land in the lockdown defenses corner: better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. Ohio State is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 34.0% (9th) to USC's 40.9% (60th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.6% (28th) to USC's 11.0% (73rd) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Both land in the lockdown defenses corner: better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. Ohio State is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 34.0% (9th) to USC's 40.9% (60th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 9.6% (28th) to USC's 11.0% (73rd) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Ohio State34.0% (9th)9.6% (28th)
USC40.9% (60th)11.0% (73rd)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Both land in the air it out corner: better than average throwing it, below it running it. Ohio State is slightly ahead running it, 4.8 (96th) to USC's 4.6 (105th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 11.6 (2nd) to USC's 8.9 (23rd) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Both land in the air it out corner: better than average throwing it, below it running it. Ohio State is slightly ahead running it, 4.80 (96th) to USC's 4.65 (105th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 11.63 (2nd) to USC's 8.92 (23rd) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Ohio State4.80 (96th)11.63 (2nd)
USC4.65 (105th)8.92 (23rd)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Both land in the wins third down corner: better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down. USC is slightly ahead at converting third downs, 50.5% (12th) to Ohio State's 49.4% (16th) in 3rd down conversion, and slightly ahead at getting off the field on third down, 34.4% (39th) to Ohio State's 35.6% (47th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Both land in the wins third down corner: better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down. USC is slightly ahead at converting third downs, 50.5% (12th) to Ohio State's 49.4% (16th) in 3rd down conversion, and slightly ahead at getting off the field on third down, 34.4% (39th) to Ohio State's 35.6% (47th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Ohio State49.4% (16th)35.6% (47th)
USC50.5% (12th)34.4% (39th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Ohio State and USC are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Ohio State's and USC's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Ohio State's Sayin is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 54.6% passing success rate (6th of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,007 passing yards (15th). USC's Jayden Maiava is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 55.2% passing success rate (3rd of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,326 passing yards (3rd). Maiava has the edge on both.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑SayinMaiava
Ohio State's Sayin is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 54.6% passing success rate (6th of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,007 passing yards (15th). USC's Jayden Maiava is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 55.2% passing success rate (3rd of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,326 passing yards (3rd). Maiava has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Sayin, Ohio State54.6% (6th)2,007 (15th)
Jayden Maiava, USC55.2% (3rd)2,326 (3rd)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Ohio State's Bo Jackson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.8 yards per carry (184th of 360 running backs) and 49.5% rushing success rate (71st). USC's King Miller is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.9 yards per carry (174th of 360 running backs) and 42.3% rushing success rate (201st). Miller has the edge in yards per carry, Jackson in rushing success rate.4681040%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑JacksonMiller
Ohio State's Bo Jackson is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.8 yards per carry (184th of 360 running backs) and 49.5% rushing success rate (71st). USC's King Miller is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.9 yards per carry (174th of 360 running backs) and 42.3% rushing success rate (201st). Miller has the edge in yards per carry, Jackson in rushing success rate.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Bo Jackson, Ohio State4.8 (184th)49.5% (71st)
King Miller, USC4.9 (174th)42.3% (201st)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Ohio State's Jeremiah Smith is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 22 explosive catches (2nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 984 receiving yards (2nd). Ohio State's Devin Mccuin is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (104th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 268 receiving yards (244th). USC's Kayden Dixon-Wyatt is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (89th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 443 receiving yards (69th). USC's Trent Mosley is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (71st of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 422 receiving yards (86th).5101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑MccuinSmithDixon-WyattMosley
Ohio State's Jeremiah Smith is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 22 explosive catches (2nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 984 receiving yards (2nd). Ohio State's Devin Mccuin is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (104th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 268 receiving yards (244th). USC's Kayden Dixon-Wyatt is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (89th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 443 receiving yards (69th). USC's Trent Mosley is in the role players corner, below average in both: 11 explosive catches (71st of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 422 receiving yards (86th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State22 (2nd)984 (2nd)
Devin Mccuin, Ohio State9 (104th)268 (244th)
Kayden Dixon-Wyatt, USC10 (89th)443 (69th)
Trent Mosley, USC11 (71st)422 (86th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Ohio State's top playmaker is Riley Pettijohn (2 sacks, 1 INT), 196th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. USC's top playmaker is Luke Wafle (3 sacks), 238th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Riley Pettijohn, Ohio State2 sacks, 1 INTLuke Wafle, USC3 sacksJaylen McClain, Ohio State2 INTsKenyatta Jackson, Ohio State2 sacksJadyn Ramos, USC2 sacksProphet Brown, USC2 INTs
Ohio State's top playmaker is Riley Pettijohn (2 sacks, 1 INT), 196th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. USC's top playmaker is Luke Wafle (3 sacks), 238th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Riley Pettijohn, Ohio State210196th
Luke Wafle, USC300238th
Jaylen McClain, Ohio State020459th
Kenyatta Jackson, Ohio State200460th
Jadyn Ramos, USC200560th
Prophet Brown, USC020561st

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Ohio State and USC?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Ohio State 14.4 points better (1st to 18th). PRIME also has Ohio State ahead, by 10.7. Elo, which only sees results, also has Ohio State ahead (3rd to 23rd).

Ohio StateUSC
SP+ overall28.6 (1st)14.2 (18th)
SP+ offense39.2 (4th)36.6 (9th)
SP+ defense10.7 (1st)22.4 (39th)
SP+ special teams0.1 (54th)-0.1 (80th)
PRIME net24.2 (3rd)13.5 (19th)
PRIME offense13.70 (3rd)12.03 (6th)
PRIME defense9.73 (9th)0.78 (60th)
PRIME SOS1.6 (32nd)-1.8 (65th)
PRIME SOR2.8 (9th)1.6 (28th)
Elo2069 (3rd)1752 (23rd)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Ohio State's offense ranks 16th in adjusted EPA per play, and the USC defense it faces ranks 95th in EPA per play allowed. USC's offense ranks 6th against Ohio State's 7th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Ohio State's offense against USC's defense. The biggest edge on the board is Ohio State's passing game: 4th in adjusted EPA per pass, against USC's 112th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch.

Ohio StateUSC
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.21 (16th)+0.23 (6th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.35 (4th)+0.36 (2nd)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.09 (48th)+0.06 (76th)
Success rate (adjusted)49.1% (5th)50.6% (2nd)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)53.0% (3rd)52.3% (6th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)31.7% (41st)37.4% (2nd)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.93 (84th)0.89 (133rd)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)3.03 (43rd)3.00 (49th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)0.99 (113th)0.88 (132nd)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)−0.02 (7th)+0.14 (95th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.07 (7th)+0.27 (112th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)−0.03 (8th)+0.06 (63rd)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)36.2% (12th)42.7% (85th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.92 (30th)0.93 (51st)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)2.76 (20th)2.87 (40th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)0.92 (14th)1.11 (65th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Ohio State or USC?

Ohio State is better throwing (5th in EPA per pass) than running (84th). USC's pass defense ranks 118th, so that's a mismatch. USC is better throwing (15th in EPA per pass) than running (87th). Ohio State's pass defense ranks 15th, so that's strength on strength.

Ohio StateUSC
EPA per play+0.27 (19th)+0.25 (23rd)
EPA per pass+0.49 (5th)+0.43 (15th)
EPA per rush+0.07 (84th)+0.06 (87th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.52 (50th)+0.55 (43rd)
EPA per play allowed−0.05 (14th)+0.12 (87th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.01 (15th)+0.36 (118th)
EPA per rush allowed−0.11 (12th)0.00 (45th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.38 (63rd)+0.17 (13th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Ohio State or USC?

Ohio State outscores FBS opponents by 25.9 a game, and USC by 7.8. Ohio State's offense ranks 10th in scoring, and the USC defense it faces ranks 77th in points allowed. USC's offense ranks 44th against Ohio State's 4th-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is Ohio State's offense against USC's defense.

Ohio StateUSC
Points scored39.3 (10th)32.8 (44th)
Points allowed13.4 (4th)25.0 (77th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Ohio State's best matchup is big plays: its offense ranks 14th in explosive play rate, and USC's defense ranks 73rd in explosive plays allowed. USC's best matchup is third downs: its offense ranks 12th in 3rd down conversion rate, and Ohio State's defense ranks 47th in 3rd down conversions allowed.

Ohio StateUSC
Pass yards / game315.7 (8th)306.5 (10th)
Rush yards / game168.0 (67th)144.1 (99th)
Yards per play7.54 (9th)6.75 (27th)
Yards per carry4.80 (96th)4.65 (105th)
Yards per attempt11.63 (2nd)8.92 (23rd)
Completion %73.7% (14th)71.3% (23rd)
Success rate51.9% (8th)53.0% (4th)
Explosive play rate15.4% (14th)13.5% (38th)
3rd down conversion49.4% (16th)50.5% (12th)
Sack rate (taken)6.9% (96th)3.9% (30th)
INT rate (thrown)3.7% (116th)2.2% (61st)
SUPLEX64.2% (18th)65.5% (16th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Ohio State's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 9th in yards per carry allowed, and USC's offense is bottom-40 in yards per carry (105th). That's a mismatch. USC's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 35th in yards per carry allowed, and Ohio State's offense is bottom-40 in yards per carry (96th). That's a mismatch.

Ohio StateUSC
Pass yards allowed / game177.1 (20th)216.6 (78th)
Rush yards allowed / game105.0 (9th)122.4 (28th)
Yards per play allowed4.39 (3rd)5.75 (71st)
Yards per carry allowed3.79 (9th)4.26 (35th)
Yards per attempt allowed5.04 (1st)7.57 (80th)
Success rate allowed34.0% (9th)40.9% (60th)
Explosive plays allowed9.6% (28th)11.0% (73rd)
3rd downs allowed35.6% (47th)34.4% (39th)
Sack rate (generated)3.9% (122nd)5.4% (88th)
INT rate (generated)1.6% (103rd)1.3% (114th)
SUPLEX allowed43.4% (9th)50.3% (43rd)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Ohio State is +0.3 in turnover margin a game and USC is −0.3. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 3-point edge for Ohio State. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it. Fumble recoveries are mostly luck, and Ohio State's takeaways lean on them (0.9 of 1.4 a game).

Ohio StateUSC
Interceptions thrown / game1.00 (105th)0.86 (84th)
Fumbles lost / game0.14 (3rd)0.00 (1st)
Giveaways / game1.14 (53rd)0.86 (26th)
Interceptions / game0.57 (84th)0.29 (119th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.86 (12th)0.29 (94th)
Takeaways / game1.43 (39th)0.57 (126th)
Turnover margin / game+0.3 (50th)-0.3 (89th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Ohio State has the more talented roster (5th in the 247Sports talent composite; USC is 9th). Ohio State also plays further above its talent: +9.7 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to USC's −0.6.

Ohio StateUSC
Talent composite964.3 (5th)899.0 (9th)
Blue-chip ratio70.0% (3rd)53.8% (11th)
Players on roster120 (17th)126 (5th)
Rated by 247Sports90 (23rd)91 (19th)
5-star players11 (3rd)4 (11th)
4-star players52 (4th)45 (8th)
3-star players26 (133rd)41 (119th)
Below 3-star1 (86th)1 (86th)
2026 transfers in17 (103rd)11 (127th)
Transfer share18.9% (114th)12.1% (129th)
SP+ vs. talent+9.7 (18th)-0.6 (68th)
Returning production68.3% (27th)59.2% (42nd)
Returning passing production94.0% (35th)90.9% (44th)
Returning rushing production54.9% (61st)78.0% (42nd)
Returning receiving production50.3% (46th)26.9% (88th)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)4 (4th)1 (1st)
Recruiting rank, last four classes4.5 (4th)10.0 (9th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Which roster costs more?

Ohio State's roster is valued at $37.9M, USC's at $34.7M. Ohio State also plays better per dollar: +9.5 points of SP+ above what its payroll predicts, to −3.0 for USC.

Ohio StateUSC
Roster value$37.9M (5th)$34.7M (7th)
Roster cost per win$6.3M (47th)$5.8M (42nd)
Projected wins per $1M0.27 (36th)0.22 (52nd)
SP+ vs. payroll+9.5 (5th)-3.0 (47th)

NIL roster value from The NIL Standard (power-conference teams plus Boise State and Oregon State). Ranks are out of 70 teams with a valuation.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Ohio State is +2.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (+1.4). USC is +2.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is roster (+2.0).

Ohio StateUSC
BAWA (total)+2.5 (8th)+2.0 (20th)
Schedule BAWA-0.3 (106th)-0.6 (116th)
Roster BAWA+1.4 (12th)+2.0 (4th)
Coach BAWA+1.4 (13th)+0.5 (49th)
Luck BAWA0.0 (67th)+0.1 (61st)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Ohio State at USC: questions people ask

Who will win Ohio State at USC?

Big Al picks Ohio State, 78% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. Ohio State's best matchup is its run defense, 9th in yards per carry allowed, against USC's run game at 105th.

When and where is Ohio State at USC?

Sat, Oct 31, 7:30 PM ET at Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, on NBC.

What's the line for Ohio State at USC?

DraftKings has Ohio State −6.5, total 51.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Ohio State–USC series record?

USC leads 13–10–1. Last meeting: Ohio State won 24–7 in 2017.

Who are the quarterbacks in Ohio State at USC?

Ohio State's is Sayin (2,007 passing yards this season); USC's is Jayden Maiava (2,326 passing yards this season).

Who's out for Ohio State at USC?

Ohio State: Sayin (QB), out indefinitely.

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Ohio State and USC: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.