This week's picks

Kent State vs. Sacramento State Prediction, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Kent State at Sacramento State

Week 9, Fri, Oct 30, 10:30 PM ET, Hornet Stadium.

Big Al's pick: Kent State, 60% to win.

The game

KickoffFri, Oct 30, 10:30 PM ET
TVESPN2
WhereHornet Stadium
Weather62°, cloudy, wind 6 mph
LineKent State −10, total 46.5
Line movementOpened Kent State −9.5; moved 0.5 points toward Kent State. Total opened 45.5, up 1.
SeriesFirst meeting

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Kent State by 5.365%44
PRIMEKent State by 10.878%
EloSacramento State52%
The lineKent State −10, opened −9.546.5, opened 45.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Kent State or Sacramento State?

Big Al's pick: Kent State. 64% to win

Which matchups decide Kent State vs. Sacramento State?

SP+ and PRIME take Kent State, but Elo has Sacramento State. Kent State's best matchup is its run defense, 77th in EPA per rush allowed, against Sacramento State's run game at 136th. Sacramento State's way back in is its early-down defense, 47th in SUPLEX allowed, against Kent State's early-down offense at 133rd.

Kent State with the ball

Sacramento State with the ball

Who's out for Kent State and Sacramento State?

Kent State

Sacramento State

How Kent State and Sacramento State compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Kent State is slightly ahead on offense, 13.1 (136th) to Sacramento State's 10.4 (138th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 33.7 (119th) to Sacramento State's 39.2 (137th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Kent State is slightly ahead on offense, 13.1 (136th) to Sacramento State's 10.4 (138th) in SP+ offense, and ahead on defense, 33.7 (119th) to Sacramento State's 39.2 (137th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Kent State13.1 (136th)33.7 (119th)
Sacramento State10.4 (138th)39.2 (137th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Kent State lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); Sacramento State in the defense carries it corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense). Sacramento State is ahead on offense, 48.4% (122nd) to Kent State's 43.0% (133rd) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 51.0% (47th) to Kent State's 64.2% (133rd) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Kent State lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); Sacramento State in the defense carries it corner (better than average on defense, below it on offense). Sacramento State is ahead on offense, 48.4% (122nd) to Kent State's 43.0% (133rd) in SUPLEX, and ahead on defense, 51.0% (47th) to Kent State's 64.2% (133rd) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Kent State43.0% (133rd)64.2% (133rd)
Sacramento State48.4% (122nd)51.0% (47th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. Sacramento State is ahead at staying on schedule, 43.8% (69th) to Kent State's 33.5% (133rd) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 9.6% (119th) to Kent State's 8.0% (132nd) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. Sacramento State is ahead at staying on schedule, 43.8% (69th) to Kent State's 33.5% (133rd) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 9.6% (119th) to Kent State's 8.0% (132nd) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Kent State33.5% (133rd)8.0% (132nd)
Sacramento State43.8% (69th)9.6% (119th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Kent State lands in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Sacramento State in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Sacramento State is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 38.7% (49th) to Kent State's 51.4% (137th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 11.0% (71st) to Kent State's 14.1% (117th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Kent State lands in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays); Sacramento State in the lockdown defenses corner (better than the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Sacramento State is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 38.7% (49th) to Kent State's 51.4% (137th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 11.0% (71st) to Kent State's 14.1% (117th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Kent State51.4% (137th)14.1% (117th)
Sacramento State38.7% (49th)11.0% (71st)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Both land in the stuck corner: below the FBS average running it and throwing it. Sacramento State is ahead running it, 4.6 (111th) to Kent State's 3.5 (134th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 7.3 (84th) to Kent State's 6.0 (121st) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Both land in the stuck corner: below the FBS average running it and throwing it. Sacramento State is ahead running it, 4.61 (111th) to Kent State's 3.53 (134th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 7.30 (84th) to Kent State's 6.05 (121st) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Kent State3.53 (134th)6.05 (121st)
Sacramento State4.61 (111th)7.30 (84th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Both land in the loses third down corner: below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down. Sacramento State is ahead at converting third downs, 36.8% (90th) to Kent State's 32.4% (122nd) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 39.0% (75th) to Kent State's 47.6% (128th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Both land in the loses third down corner: below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down. Sacramento State is ahead at converting third downs, 36.8% (90th) to Kent State's 32.4% (122nd) in 3rd down conversion, and ahead at getting off the field on third down, 39.0% (75th) to Kent State's 47.6% (128th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Kent State32.4% (122nd)47.6% (128th)
Sacramento State36.8% (90th)39.0% (75th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Kent State and Sacramento State are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Kent State's and Sacramento State's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Kent State's Dru Deshields is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 37.3% passing success rate (145th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,265 passing yards (88th). Sacramento State's Jackson Sharman is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 36.6% passing success rate (147th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,049 passing yards (106th). Deshields has the edge on both.30%40%50%60%70%5001,0001,5002,0002,5003,000Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑DeshieldsSharman
Kent State's Dru Deshields is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 37.3% passing success rate (145th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,265 passing yards (88th). Sacramento State's Jackson Sharman is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 36.6% passing success rate (147th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,049 passing yards (106th). Deshields has the edge on both.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Dru Deshields, Kent State37.3% (145th)1,265 (88th)
Jackson Sharman, Sacramento State36.6% (147th)1,049 (106th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Kent State's Brandon White is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.6 yards per carry (322nd of 360 running backs) and 34.5% rushing success rate (306th). Sacramento State's Isaiah Ene is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.3 yards per carry (130th of 360 running backs) and 45.3% rushing success rate (141st). Ene has the edge on both.24681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑WhiteEne
Kent State's Brandon White is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 3.6 yards per carry (322nd of 360 running backs) and 34.5% rushing success rate (306th). Sacramento State's Isaiah Ene is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 5.3 yards per carry (130th of 360 running backs) and 45.3% rushing success rate (141st). Ene has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Brandon White, Kent State3.6 (322nd)34.5% (306th)
Isaiah Ene, Sacramento State5.3 (130th)45.3% (141st)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Kent State's Wayne Harris is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (83rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 501 receiving yards (52nd). Kent State's Da'Realyst Clark is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (278th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 215 receiving yards (331st). Sacramento State's Onterrio Smith Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 3 explosive catches (486th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 324 receiving yards (167th). Sacramento State's Raiden Brown is in the role players corner, below average in both: 1 explosive catches (625th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 122 receiving yards (534th).-5051015202502004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑ClarkHarrisSmith Jr.Brown
Kent State's Wayne Harris is in the role players corner, below average in both: 10 explosive catches (83rd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 501 receiving yards (52nd). Kent State's Da'Realyst Clark is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (278th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 215 receiving yards (331st). Sacramento State's Onterrio Smith Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 3 explosive catches (486th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 324 receiving yards (167th). Sacramento State's Raiden Brown is in the role players corner, below average in both: 1 explosive catches (625th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 122 receiving yards (534th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Wayne Harris, Kent State10 (83rd)501 (52nd)
Da'Realyst Clark, Kent State5 (278th)215 (331st)
Onterrio Smith Jr., Sacramento State3 (486th)324 (167th)
Raiden Brown, Sacramento State1 (625th)122 (534th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Kent State's top playmaker is Hayden Dawahare (3 sacks), 160th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Sacramento State's top playmaker is Boogsie Silvera (3 INTs), 207th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Hayden Dawahare, Kent State3 sacksJaihien Roy, Kent State2 sacks, 1 INTRocco Nicholl, Kent State3 sacksBoogsie Silvera, Sacramento State3 INTsCollin Kallhoff, Sacramento State1 sack, 1 fumble recoveryAlex Rocha, Sacramento State1 sack
Kent State's top playmaker is Hayden Dawahare (3 sacks), 160th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Sacramento State's top playmaker is Boogsie Silvera (3 INTs), 207th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Hayden Dawahare, Kent State300160th
Jaihien Roy, Kent State210161st
Rocco Nicholl, Kent State300162nd
Boogsie Silvera, Sacramento State030207th
Collin Kallhoff, Sacramento State101493rd
Alex Rocha, Sacramento State1001283rd

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Kent State and Sacramento State?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Kent State 7.8 points better (132nd to 138th). PRIME also has Kent State ahead, by 13.3. Elo, which only sees results, also has Kent State ahead (134th to 137th).

Kent StateSacramento State
SP+ overall-21.3 (132nd)-29.1 (138th)
SP+ offense13.1 (136th)10.4 (138th)
SP+ defense33.7 (119th)39.2 (137th)
SP+ special teams-0.6 (131st)-0.4 (113th)
PRIME net-16.8 (131st)-30.1 (138th)
PRIME offense-9.32 (130th)-16.30 (138th)
PRIME defense-6.52 (118th)-13.36 (136th)
PRIME SOS-3.5 (80th)-9.1 (129th)
PRIME SOR-1.7 (113th)-4.7 (138th)
Elo1026 (134th)986 (137th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Kent State's offense ranks 136th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Sacramento State defense it faces ranks 124th in EPA per play allowed. Sacramento State's offense ranks 137th against Kent State's 110th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Kent State's big plays: 83rd in adjusted explosiveness, against Sacramento State's 130th-ranked defense. Adjust for opponents and Kent State's defense falls from 84th to 110th in EPA per play allowed: a lot of that came against soft offenses.

Kent StateSacramento State
EPA per play (adjusted)−0.03 (136th)−0.07 (137th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.12 (115th)+0.03 (135th)
EPA per rush (adjusted)−0.06 (137th)−0.06 (136th)
Success rate (adjusted)33.9% (136th)36.7% (127th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)40.8% (136th)45.1% (100th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)27.4% (125th)25.3% (136th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.93 (83rd)0.88 (134th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.62 (135th)2.69 (130th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)0.87 (134th)1.05 (94th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.17 (110th)+0.20 (124th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.26 (111th)+0.30 (128th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.07 (77th)+0.13 (116th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)46.4% (120th)44.1% (101st)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.93 (53rd)0.98 (130th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.02 (90th)3.14 (119th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.11 (63rd)1.28 (107th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Kent State or Sacramento State?

Kent State is better throwing (87th in EPA per pass) than running (130th). Sacramento State's pass defense ranks 125th, so that's an edge. Sacramento State is about as good throwing (127th in EPA per pass) as running (137th).

Kent StateSacramento State
EPA per play−0.01 (124th)−0.11 (137th)
EPA per pass+0.17 (87th)−0.01 (127th)
EPA per rush−0.11 (130th)−0.19 (137th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.42 (85th)+0.09 (132nd)
EPA per play allowed+0.11 (84th)+0.19 (115th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.18 (72nd)+0.38 (125th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.06 (66th)+0.12 (94th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.32 (47th)+0.46 (94th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Kent State or Sacramento State?

Kent State is outscored by 15.6 a game, and Sacramento State is outscored by 17.7. Kent State's offense ranks 137th in scoring, and the Sacramento State defense it faces ranks 126th in points allowed. Sacramento State's offense ranks 134th against Kent State's 115th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.

Kent StateSacramento State
Points scored14.9 (137th)15.2 (134th)
Points allowed30.5 (115th)32.9 (126th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Kent State has no clear edge here. Its best is 3rd down conversion rate, 122nd, against a defense ranked 75th in 3rd down conversions allowed. Sacramento State's best matchup is staying on schedule: its offense ranks 69th in success rate, and Kent State's defense ranks 137th in success rate allowed. That's a mismatch.

Kent StateSacramento State
Pass yards / game185.7 (111th)196.1 (102nd)
Rush yards / game105.0 (132nd)118.0 (127th)
Yards per play4.67 (133rd)5.83 (93rd)
Yards per carry3.53 (134th)4.61 (111th)
Yards per attempt6.05 (121st)7.30 (84th)
Completion %52.6% (118th)70.7% (26th)
Success rate33.5% (133rd)43.8% (69th)
Explosive play rate8.0% (132nd)9.6% (119th)
3rd down conversion32.4% (122nd)36.8% (90th)
Sack rate (taken)5.7% (75th)5.1% (60th)
INT rate (thrown)3.3% (104th)3.2% (101st)
SUPLEX43.0% (133rd)48.4% (122nd)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Kent State's defense is best placed to pick off passes: it ranks 42nd in interception rate, and Sacramento State's offense is bottom-40 at avoiding interceptions (101st). Sacramento State's defense is best placed to win on early downs: it ranks 47th in SUPLEX allowed, and Kent State's offense is bottom-20 in SUPLEX (133rd). That's a mismatch.

Kent StateSacramento State
Pass yards allowed / game217.3 (83rd)206.7 (61st)
Rush yards allowed / game174.1 (100th)161.7 (89th)
Yards per play allowed7.01 (125th)5.90 (79th)
Yards per carry allowed5.49 (108th)5.03 (83rd)
Yards per attempt allowed9.69 (134th)7.02 (69th)
Success rate allowed51.4% (137th)38.7% (49th)
Explosive plays allowed14.1% (117th)11.0% (71st)
3rd downs allowed47.6% (128th)39.0% (75th)
Sack rate (generated)7.1% (48th)2.8% (133rd)
INT rate (generated)3.2% (42nd)1.5% (109th)
SUPLEX allowed64.2% (133rd)51.0% (47th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Kent State is −0.5 in turnover margin a game and Sacramento State is −1.1. At about five points a turnover, that's roughly a 3-point edge for Kent State. Turnover margin rarely holds from one month to the next, so don't count on it.

Kent StateSacramento State
Interceptions thrown / game0.88 (101st)0.86 (84th)
Fumbles lost / game0.63 (92nd)0.86 (116th)
Giveaways / game1.50 (101st)1.71 (117th)
Interceptions / game0.63 (77th)0.43 (105th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.38 (89th)0.14 (121st)
Takeaways / game1.00 (88th)0.57 (126th)
Turnover margin / game-0.5 (103rd)-1.1 (131st)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Sacramento State has the more talented roster (114th in the 247Sports talent composite; Kent State is 130th). But Kent State plays further above its talent: −12.5 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Sacramento State's −22.7.

Kent StateSacramento State
Talent composite522.8 (130th)561.4 (114th)
Blue-chip ratio1.5% (123rd)4.2% (101st)
Players on roster111 (67th)116 (34th)
Rated by 247Sports68 (103rd)72 (90th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players1 (119th)3 (94th)
3-star players57 (86th)61 (66th)
Below 3-star10 (4th)8 (8th)
2026 transfers in17 (103rd)28 (41st)
Transfer share25.0% (88th)38.9% (35th)
SP+ vs. talent-12.5 (129th)-22.7 (138th)
Returning production64.1% (36th)— ()
Returning passing production103.2% (6th)— ()
Returning rushing production75.8% (45th)— ()
Returning receiving production45.2% (54th)— ()
2026 recruiting class (national rank)122 (122nd)125 (125th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes108.8 (113th)131.2 (130th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Kent State is −1.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.4). Sacramento State is −3.0 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−3.4).

Kent StateSacramento State
BAWA (total)-1.0 (109th)-3.0 (134th)
Schedule BAWA+0.7 (62nd)+1.8 (9th)
Roster BAWA-0.8 (119th)-0.8 (116th)
Coach BAWA-1.4 (123rd)-3.4 (138th)
Luck BAWA+0.6 (32nd)-0.7 (109th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Kent State at Sacramento State: questions people ask

Who will win Kent State at Sacramento State?

Big Al picks Kent State, 64% to win. SP+ and PRIME agree; Elo has Sacramento State. Kent State's best matchup is its run defense, 77th in EPA per rush allowed, against Sacramento State's run game at 136th.

When and where is Kent State at Sacramento State?

Fri, Oct 30, 10:30 PM ET at Hornet Stadium, on ESPN2.

What's the line for Kent State at Sacramento State?

DraftKings has Kent State −10, total 46.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Kent State–Sacramento State series record?

This is the first meeting.

Who are the quarterbacks in Kent State at Sacramento State?

Kent State's is Dru Deshields (1,265 passing yards this season); Sacramento State's is Jackson Sharman (1,049 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Kent State and Sacramento State: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.