This week's picks

Florida Atlantic vs. North Texas Prediction, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Florida Atlantic at North Texas

Week 9, Thu, Oct 29, 7:30 PM ET, DATCU Stadium.

Big Al's pick: North Texas, 79% to win.

The game

KickoffThu, Oct 29, 7:30 PM ET
TVESPN
WhereDATCU Stadium
Weather77°, cloudy, wind 7 mph
LineNorth Texas −13.5, total 77.5
Line movementOpened North Texas −12.5; moved 1 point toward North Texas. Total opened 69.5, up 8.
SeriesFlorida Atlantic leads 8–7
Last meetingNorth Texas 41–37 in 2024

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+North Texas by 5.365%79
PRIMENorth Texas by 11.479%
EloNorth Texas94%
The lineNorth Texas −13.5, opened −12.577.5, opened 69.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Wed, Oct 28, 2:21 PM ET.

Who wins, Florida Atlantic or North Texas?

Big Al's pick: North Texas. 79% to win

Which matchups decide Florida Atlantic vs. North Texas?

All three ratings favor North Texas, by 5.3 to 11.4 points. North Texas' best matchup is its offense, 6th in yards per play, against Florida Atlantic's defense at 136th. Florida Atlantic's way back in is its scoring offense, 17th in points per game, against North Texas' scoring defense at 116th.

Florida Atlantic with the ball

North Texas with the ball

Who's out for Florida Atlantic and North Texas?

Florida Atlantic

North Texas

How Florida Atlantic and North Texas compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Both land in the offense first corner: better than average on offense, below it on defense. North Texas is ahead on offense, 33.5 (24th) to Florida Atlantic's 30.1 (44th) in SP+ offense, and slightly ahead on defense, 33.7 (119th) to Florida Atlantic's 33.9 (123rd) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Both land in the offense first corner: better than average on offense, below it on defense. North Texas is ahead on offense, 33.5 (24th) to Florida Atlantic's 30.1 (44th) in SP+ offense, and slightly ahead on defense, 33.7 (119th) to Florida Atlantic's 33.9 (123rd) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Florida Atlantic30.1 (44th)33.9 (123rd)
North Texas33.5 (24th)33.7 (119th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Florida Atlantic lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); North Texas in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). North Texas is ahead on offense, 68.7% (6th) to Florida Atlantic's 53.4% (88th) in SUPLEX, and slightly ahead on defense, 59.6% (107th) to Florida Atlantic's 61.1% (114th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Florida Atlantic lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); North Texas in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). North Texas is ahead on offense, 68.7% (6th) to Florida Atlantic's 53.4% (88th) in SUPLEX, and slightly ahead on defense, 59.6% (107th) to Florida Atlantic's 61.1% (114th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Florida Atlantic53.4% (88th)61.1% (114th)
North Texas68.7% (6th)59.6% (107th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Florida Atlantic lands in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays); North Texas in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). North Texas is ahead at staying on schedule, 50.1% (15th) to Florida Atlantic's 47.3% (31st) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 15.3% (15th) to Florida Atlantic's 9.9% (116th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Florida Atlantic lands in the grind it out corner (better than average at staying on schedule, below it at hitting big plays); North Texas in the efficient and explosive corner (better than the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays). North Texas is ahead at staying on schedule, 50.1% (15th) to Florida Atlantic's 47.3% (31st) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 15.3% (15th) to Florida Atlantic's 9.9% (116th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Florida Atlantic47.3% (31st)9.9% (116th)
North Texas50.1% (15th)15.3% (15th)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Both land in the leaky corner: below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. North Texas is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 43.3% (85th) to Florida Atlantic's 45.2% (105th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 12.7% (100th) to Florida Atlantic's 14.7% (125th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Both land in the leaky corner: below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays. North Texas is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 43.3% (85th) to Florida Atlantic's 45.2% (105th) in success rate allowed, and ahead at limiting big plays, 12.7% (100th) to Florida Atlantic's 14.7% (125th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Florida Atlantic45.2% (105th)14.7% (125th)
North Texas43.3% (85th)12.7% (100th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Florida Atlantic lands in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it); North Texas in the balanced and good corner (better than the FBS average running it and throwing it). North Texas is ahead running it, 5.7 (33rd) to Florida Atlantic's 4.1 (125th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 9.5 (12th) to Florida Atlantic's 7.8 (59th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Florida Atlantic lands in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it); North Texas in the balanced and good corner (better than the FBS average running it and throwing it). North Texas is ahead running it, 5.72 (33rd) to Florida Atlantic's 4.16 (125th) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 9.50 (12th) to Florida Atlantic's 7.87 (59th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Florida Atlantic4.16 (125th)7.87 (59th)
North Texas5.72 (33rd)9.50 (12th)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Florida Atlantic lands in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down); North Texas in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Florida Atlantic is better at converting third downs, 50.0% (13th) to North Texas' 46.8% (28th) in 3rd down conversion. North Texas is better at getting off the field on third down, 38.2% (66th) to Florida Atlantic's 41.9% (95th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Florida Atlantic lands in the stays on the field corner (better than average at converting third downs, below it at getting off the field on third down); North Texas in the wins third down corner (better than the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Florida Atlantic is better at converting third downs, 50.0% (13th) to North Texas' 46.8% (28th) in 3rd down conversion. North Texas is better at getting off the field on third down, 38.2% (66th) to Florida Atlantic's 41.9% (95th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Florida Atlantic50.0% (13th)41.9% (95th)
North Texas46.8% (28th)38.2% (66th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Florida Atlantic and North Texas are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Florida Atlantic's and North Texas' players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? North Texas' Tayven Jackson is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 56.0% passing success rate (2nd of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,194 passing yards (7th).35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑Jackson
North Texas' Tayven Jackson is in the volume and efficiency corner, above the average quarterback in both passing success rate and passing yards: 56.0% passing success rate (2nd of 171 quarterbacks) and 2,194 passing yards (7th).
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Tayven Jackson, North Texas56.0% (2nd)2,194 (7th)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Florida Atlantic's Ethan Ervin is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.2 yards per carry (269th of 360 running backs) and 41.4% rushing success rate (213th). North Texas' Jahiem White is in the boom or bust corner, above average in yards per carry, below it in rushing success rate: 7.4 yards per carry (17th of 360 running backs) and 50.9% rushing success rate (57th). White has the edge on both.24681030%40%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑ErvinWhite
Florida Atlantic's Ethan Ervin is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.2 yards per carry (269th of 360 running backs) and 41.4% rushing success rate (213th). North Texas' Jahiem White is in the boom or bust corner, above average in yards per carry, below it in rushing success rate: 7.4 yards per carry (17th of 360 running backs) and 50.9% rushing success rate (57th). White has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Ethan Ervin, Florida Atlantic4.2 (269th)41.4% (213th)
Jahiem White, North Texas7.4 (17th)50.9% (57th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Florida Atlantic's Branden Hoch is in the role players corner, below average in both: 2 explosive catches (525th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 115 receiving yards (550th). Florida Atlantic's Tucker Holloway is in the role players corner, below average in both: 3 explosive catches (442nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 112 receiving yards (559th). North Texas' Justin Stevenson is in the yards without the big plays corner, above average in receiving yards, below it in explosive catches: 13 explosive catches (36th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 662 receiving yards (17th). North Texas' Corri Milliner is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (102nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 325 receiving yards (165th).051015202502004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑HochHollowayMillinerStevenson
Florida Atlantic's Branden Hoch is in the role players corner, below average in both: 2 explosive catches (525th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 115 receiving yards (550th). Florida Atlantic's Tucker Holloway is in the role players corner, below average in both: 3 explosive catches (442nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 112 receiving yards (559th). North Texas' Justin Stevenson is in the yards without the big plays corner, above average in receiving yards, below it in explosive catches: 13 explosive catches (36th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 662 receiving yards (17th). North Texas' Corri Milliner is in the role players corner, below average in both: 9 explosive catches (102nd of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 325 receiving yards (165th).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Branden Hoch, Florida Atlantic2 (525th)115 (550th)
Tucker Holloway, Florida Atlantic3 (442nd)112 (559th)
Justin Stevenson, North Texas13 (36th)662 (17th)
Corri Milliner, North Texas9 (102nd)325 (165th)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Florida Atlantic's top playmaker is Bo Simpson-Nealy (2 INTs), 333rd of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. North Texas' top playmaker is Zakye Barker (1 sack, 2 fumble recoveries), 191st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Zakye Barker, North Texas1 sack, 2 fumble recoveriesBo Simpson-Nealy, Florida Atlantic2 INTsBrenden Reese, North Texas1 sack, 1 fumble recoveryDavion Rhodes, North Texas1 sack, 1 fumble recoveryAhlston Ware, Florida Atlantic1 fumble recoveryChris Tooley, Florida Atlantic1 INT
Florida Atlantic's top playmaker is Bo Simpson-Nealy (2 INTs), 333rd of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. North Texas' top playmaker is Zakye Barker (1 sack, 2 fumble recoveries), 191st of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Zakye Barker, North Texas102191st
Bo Simpson-Nealy, Florida Atlantic020333rd
Brenden Reese, North Texas101447th
Davion Rhodes, North Texas101448th
Ahlston Ware, Florida Atlantic001787th
Chris Tooley, Florida Atlantic010788th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Florida Atlantic and North Texas?

On a neutral field, SP+ has North Texas 2.8 points better (72nd to 90th). PRIME also has North Texas ahead, by 8.9. Elo, which only sees results, also has North Texas ahead (36th to 117th).

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
SP+ overall-3.4 (90th)-0.6 (72nd)
SP+ offense30.1 (44th)33.5 (24th)
SP+ defense33.9 (123rd)33.7 (119th)
SP+ special teams0.3 (28th)-0.4 (113th)
PRIME net-6.2 (95th)2.7 (57th)
PRIME offense1.70 (48th)8.89 (19th)
PRIME defense-8.61 (131st)-6.07 (115th)
PRIME SOS-7.3 (117th)-3.1 (76th)
PRIME SOR0.3 (58th)1.0 (41st)
Elo1239 (117th)1675 (36th)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Florida Atlantic's offense ranks 49th in adjusted EPA per play, and the North Texas defense it faces ranks 70th in EPA per play allowed. North Texas' offense ranks 10th against Florida Atlantic's 131st-ranked defense. The matchup that decides it is North Texas' offense against Florida Atlantic's defense. The biggest edge on the board is North Texas' big plays: 17th in adjusted explosiveness, against Florida Atlantic's 138th-ranked defense. That's a mismatch. Adjust for opponents and Florida Atlantic's offense falls from 25th to 49th in EPA per play: a lot of that came against soft defenses.

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
EPA per play (adjusted)+0.13 (49th)+0.22 (10th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.23 (40th)+0.32 (10th)
EPA per rush (adjusted)+0.06 (70th)+0.10 (44th)
Success rate (adjusted)44.2% (36th)46.7% (18th)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)48.3% (42nd)50.8% (18th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)33.2% (20th)32.6% (25th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.94 (49th)0.97 (17th)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.83 (109th)2.99 (54th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)0.82 (138th)1.31 (25th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.23 (131st)+0.11 (70th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.24 (96th)+0.28 (122nd)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.21 (138th)+0.04 (48th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)44.0% (100th)43.1% (92nd)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)1.03 (138th)0.92 (34th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.06 (101st)2.82 (27th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.90 (138th)1.26 (100th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Florida Atlantic or North Texas?

Florida Atlantic is about as good throwing (31st in EPA per pass) as running (44th). North Texas is better throwing (2nd in EPA per pass) than running (22nd). Florida Atlantic's pass defense ranks 83rd, so that's a mismatch. On third down, North Texas has the edge: its offense ranks 17th in EPA per third-down play, and the defense it faces ranks 106th.

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
EPA per play+0.24 (25th)+0.37 (2nd)
EPA per pass+0.36 (31st)+0.55 (2nd)
EPA per rush+0.15 (44th)+0.20 (22nd)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.73 (12th)+0.66 (17th)
EPA per play allowed+0.26 (130th)+0.12 (87th)
EPA per pass allowed+0.21 (83rd)+0.41 (130th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.36 (137th)0.00 (45th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.52 (106th)+0.28 (34th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Florida Atlantic or North Texas?

Florida Atlantic outscores FBS opponents by 3.3 a game, and North Texas by 12.5. Florida Atlantic's offense ranks 17th in scoring, and the North Texas defense it faces ranks 116th in points allowed. North Texas' offense ranks 2nd against Florida Atlantic's 129th-ranked defense. Both offenses have the edge on the defenses they face.

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
Points scored37.3 (17th)43.1 (2nd)
Points allowed34.0 (129th)30.6 (116th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Florida Atlantic's best matchup is staying on schedule: its offense ranks 31st in success rate, and North Texas' defense ranks 85th in success rate allowed. North Texas' best matchup is big plays: its offense ranks 15th in explosive play rate, and Florida Atlantic's defense ranks 125th in explosive plays allowed. That's a mismatch.

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
Pass yards / game323.7 (5th)347.6 (2nd)
Rush yards / game137.9 (103rd)190.3 (39th)
Yards per play6.06 (75th)7.61 (6th)
Yards per carry4.16 (125th)5.72 (33rd)
Yards per attempt7.87 (59th)9.50 (12th)
Completion %69.8% (31st)69.5% (32nd)
Success rate47.3% (31st)50.1% (15th)
Explosive play rate9.9% (116th)15.3% (15th)
3rd down conversion50.0% (13th)46.8% (28th)
Sack rate (taken)4.3% (37th)2.3% (8th)
INT rate (thrown)1.4% (33rd)1.9% (49th)
SUPLEX53.4% (88th)68.7% (6th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Florida Atlantic's defense is best placed to pick off passes: it ranks 18th in interception rate, and North Texas' offense is above average at avoiding interceptions (49th). North Texas' defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 76th in yards per carry allowed, and Florida Atlantic's offense is bottom-20 in yards per carry (125th).

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
Pass yards allowed / game187.9 (32nd)204.1 (54th)
Rush yards allowed / game264.4 (137th)185.1 (111th)
Yards per play allowed7.38 (136th)6.18 (89th)
Yards per carry allowed6.93 (137th)4.89 (76th)
Yards per attempt allowed8.59 (113th)8.77 (116th)
Success rate allowed45.2% (105th)43.3% (85th)
Explosive plays allowed14.7% (125th)12.7% (100th)
3rd downs allowed41.9% (95th)38.2% (66th)
Sack rate (generated)5.6% (80th)7.4% (42nd)
INT rate (generated)3.9% (18th)3.1% (47th)
SUPLEX allowed61.1% (114th)59.6% (107th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: Florida Atlantic is +0.3 a game and North Texas +0.3. Fumble recoveries are mostly luck, and North Texas' takeaways lean on them (0.7 of 1.4 a game).

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
Interceptions thrown / game0.57 (40th)0.71 (59th)
Fumbles lost / game0.43 (53rd)0.43 (53rd)
Giveaways / game1.00 (37th)1.14 (53rd)
Interceptions / game0.86 (45th)0.71 (64th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.43 (68th)0.71 (22nd)
Takeaways / game1.29 (54th)1.43 (39th)
Turnover margin / game+0.3 (50th)+0.3 (50th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

North Texas has the more talented roster (95th in the 247Sports talent composite; Florida Atlantic is 98th). North Texas also plays further above its talent: +3.2 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Florida Atlantic's +0.9.

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
Talent composite593.4 (98th)602.1 (95th)
Blue-chip ratio2.9% (112th)9.8% (71st)
Players on roster115 (40th)106 (99th)
Rated by 247Sports68 (103rd)61 (118th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players2 (106th)6 (73rd)
3-star players60 (74th)53 (99th)
Below 3-star6 (20th)2 (68th)
2026 transfers in30 (31st)49 (4th)
Transfer share44.1% (27th)80.3% (1st)
SP+ vs. talent+0.9 (61st)+3.2 (49th)
Returning production68.4% (26th)2.5% (129th)
Returning passing production93.4% (38th)2.4% (105th)
Returning rushing production106.8% (13th)2.8% (111th)
Returning receiving production47.5% (51st)2.4% (131st)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)130 (130th)137 (135th)
Recruiting rank, last four classes94.0 (93rd)104.5 (110th)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Florida Atlantic is +1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is schedule (+1.3). North Texas is +1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is luck (+1.1). North Texas' record is running 1.1 wins ahead of its play on luck alone, so it's not as good as the record says.

Florida AtlanticNorth Texas
BAWA (total)+1.5 (30th)+1.5 (30th)
Schedule BAWA+1.3 (25th)+0.6 (66th)
Roster BAWA-0.3 (92nd)-0.5 (100th)
Coach BAWA-0.2 (76th)+0.3 (55th)
Luck BAWA+0.6 (30th)+1.1 (9th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Florida Atlantic at North Texas: questions people ask

Who will win Florida Atlantic at North Texas?

Big Al picks North Texas, 79% to win. All three ratings favor the same team. North Texas' best matchup is its offense, 6th in yards per play, against Florida Atlantic's defense at 136th.

When and where is Florida Atlantic at North Texas?

Thu, Oct 29, 7:30 PM ET at DATCU Stadium, on ESPN.

What's the line for Florida Atlantic at North Texas?

DraftKings has North Texas −13.5, total 77.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Florida Atlantic–North Texas series record?

Florida Atlantic leads 8–7. Last meeting: North Texas won 41–37 in 2024.

Who's out for Florida Atlantic at North Texas?

Florida Atlantic: Antonio Johnson (TE) hasn't played since Week 4.

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Florida Atlantic and North Texas: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.