This week's picks

Sam Houston vs. Missouri State Prediction, Week 9 2026

Big Al's CFB Lab
Data updated
Site
Picks two teams at random. Any FBS team can come up.

How we picked it

How we picked it

Three ratings look at a team in three different ways. The numbers' pick is the team at least two of them favor. On the toss-ups and the biggest games, Big Al makes the call himself and says why.

Where the game is won

Where the game is won

Each row puts one team's unit against the unit it faces, by national rank out of all FBS teams. An edge is a gap of 25 spots or more.

Ratings: SP+ via CFB Update; PRIME via primecfb.com. Box and play stats computed from CollegeFootballData.com play data (via the public cfbfastR files), FBS games only for scoring. Rushing yards here exclude sacks, so they run higher than official totals. Ranks are out of 138 FBS teams.

Share as an image

Image style

Leave a field empty to drop it from the image. A blank line in the description starts a new paragraph.

Sam Houston at Missouri State

Week 9, Tue, Oct 27, 8:00 PM ET, Plaster Sports Complex.

Big Al's pick: Missouri State, 61% to win.

The game

KickoffTue, Oct 27, 8:00 PM ET
TVESPN2
WherePlaster Sports Complex
Weather65°, clear, wind 5 mph
LineMissouri State −6, total 51.5
Line movementHasn't moved since it opened.
SeriesTied 1–1
Last meetingSam Houston 20–17 in 2006

The ratings and the line

MarginWin chanceTotal
SP+Missouri State by 3.660%47
PRIMEMissouri State by 4.462%
EloMissouri State69%
The lineMissouri State −651.5

Margins include home field. SP+ is Bill Connelly's rating; Sources has PRIME and Elo. Line and total from DraftKings, as of Tue, Oct 27, 2:00 PM ET.

Who wins, Sam Houston or Missouri State?

Big Al's pick: Missouri State. 64% to win

Which matchups decide Sam Houston vs. Missouri State?

All three ratings favor Missouri State, by 3.6 to 4.4 points. Sam Houston's way back in is its 3rd down defense, 27th in 3rd downs allowed, against Missouri State's 3rd down offense at 105th.

Sam Houston with the ball

Missouri State with the ball

Who's out for Sam Houston and Missouri State?

Sam Houston

Missouri State

How Sam Houston and Missouri State compare, in charts

Which team is better on offense and on defense?

Which team is better on offense and on defense? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Missouri State is better on offense, 19.0 (114th) to Sam Houston's 13.9 (132nd) in SP+ offense. Sam Houston is better on defense, 31.6 (109th) to Missouri State's 35.4 (128th) in SP+ defense.1020304010152025303540SP+ offense: better →SP+ defense: better →Defense firstComplete teamsStrugglingOffense first
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average on offense and on defense. Missouri State is better on offense, 19.0 (114th) to Sam Houston's 13.9 (132nd) in SP+ offense. Sam Houston is better on defense, 31.6 (109th) to Missouri State's 35.4 (128th) in SP+ defense.
SP+ offenseSP+ defense
Sam Houston13.9 (132nd)31.6 (109th)
Missouri State19.0 (114th)35.4 (128th)

Who wins on early downs?

Who wins on early downs? Sam Houston lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); Missouri State in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Missouri State is better on offense, 56.6% (67th) to Sam Houston's 50.0% (106th) in SUPLEX. Sam Houston is better on defense, 56.6% (88th) to Missouri State's 61.6% (117th) in SUPLEX allowed.40%50%60%70%80%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%SUPLEX on offense: better →SUPLEX allowed on defense: better →Defense carries itGood on both sidesStrugglingOffense carries it
Sam Houston lands in the struggling corner (below the FBS average on offense and on defense); Missouri State in the offense carries it corner (better than average on offense, below it on defense). Missouri State is better on offense, 56.6% (67th) to Sam Houston's 50.0% (106th) in SUPLEX. Sam Houston is better on defense, 56.6% (88th) to Missouri State's 61.6% (117th) in SUPLEX allowed.
SUPLEXSUPLEX allowed
Sam Houston50.0% (106th)56.6% (88th)
Missouri State56.6% (67th)61.6% (117th)

How do the two offenses move the ball?

How do the two offenses move the ball? Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. Missouri State is ahead at staying on schedule, 42.0% (84th) to Sam Houston's 37.0% (124th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 11.8% (82nd) to Sam Houston's 9.1% (127th) in explosive play rate.8%10%13%15%18%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate: stays on schedule more →Explosive play rate: more big plays →Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingGrind it out
Both land in the struggling corner: below the FBS average at staying on schedule and at hitting big plays. Missouri State is ahead at staying on schedule, 42.0% (84th) to Sam Houston's 37.0% (124th) in success rate, and ahead at hitting big plays, 11.8% (82nd) to Sam Houston's 9.1% (127th) in explosive play rate.
Success rateExplosive play rate
Sam Houston37.0% (124th)9.1% (127th)
Missouri State42.0% (84th)11.8% (82nd)

Which defense is harder to move on?

Which defense is harder to move on? Sam Houston lands in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays); Missouri State in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Sam Houston is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 41.1% (64th) to Missouri State's 50.2% (135th) in success rate allowed, and slightly ahead at limiting big plays, 12.4% (95th) to Missouri State's 13.0% (104th) in explosive plays allowed.5%10%15%20%30%35%40%45%50%55%Success rate allowed: fewer →Explosive plays allowed: fewer →Bend, don't breakLockdown defensesLeakyStingy but gives up big plays
Sam Houston lands in the stingy but gives up big plays corner (better than average at keeping offenses behind schedule, below it at limiting big plays); Missouri State in the leaky corner (below the FBS average at keeping offenses behind schedule and at limiting big plays). Sam Houston is ahead at keeping offenses behind schedule, 41.1% (64th) to Missouri State's 50.2% (135th) in success rate allowed, and slightly ahead at limiting big plays, 12.4% (95th) to Missouri State's 13.0% (104th) in explosive plays allowed.
Success rate allowedExplosive plays allowed
Sam Houston41.1% (64th)12.4% (95th)
Missouri State50.2% (135th)13.0% (104th)

Who runs it and throws it better?

Who runs it and throws it better? Sam Houston lands in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it); Missouri State in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). Missouri State is ahead running it, 4.8 (93rd) to Sam Houston's 4.2 (121st) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 7.8 (63rd) to Sam Houston's 6.7 (108th) in yards per attempt.46810124567Yards per carry: better →Yards per pass attempt: better →Air it outBalanced and goodStuckGround and pound
Sam Houston lands in the stuck corner (below the FBS average running it and throwing it); Missouri State in the air it out corner (better than average throwing it, below it running it). Missouri State is ahead running it, 4.82 (93rd) to Sam Houston's 4.25 (121st) in yards per carry, and ahead throwing it, 7.80 (63rd) to Sam Houston's 6.72 (108th) in yards per attempt.
Yards per carryYards per attempt
Sam Houston4.25 (121st)6.72 (108th)
Missouri State4.82 (93rd)7.80 (63rd)

Who wins on third down?

Who wins on third down? Sam Houston lands in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs); Missouri State in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Missouri State is slightly better at converting third downs, 34.8% (105th) to Sam Houston's 33.3% (112th) in 3rd down conversion. Sam Houston is better at getting off the field on third down, 32.6% (27th) to Missouri State's 46.8% (124th) in 3rd downs allowed.20%30%40%50%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%3rd down conversion, offense: better →3rd downs allowed, defense: better →Gets off the fieldWins third downLoses third downStays on the field
Sam Houston lands in the gets off the field corner (better than average at getting off the field on third down, below it at converting third downs); Missouri State in the loses third down corner (below the FBS average at converting third downs and at getting off the field on third down). Missouri State is slightly better at converting third downs, 34.8% (105th) to Sam Houston's 33.3% (112th) in 3rd down conversion. Sam Houston is better at getting off the field on third down, 32.6% (27th) to Missouri State's 46.8% (124th) in 3rd downs allowed.
3rd down conversion3rd downs allowed
Sam Houston33.3% (112th)32.6% (27th)
Missouri State34.8% (105th)46.8% (124th)

Each chart puts all 138 FBS teams on two stats; Sam Houston and Missouri State are lit. Dashed lines are the FBS averages, and up and right is better. Ranks in parentheses. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How Sam Houston's and Missouri State's players compare

How do the quarterbacks compare?

How do the quarterbacks compare? Sam Houston's Landyn Locke is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 37.8% passing success rate (137th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,703 passing yards (26th). Missouri State's Marcel Reed is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 39.1% passing success rate (129th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,404 passing yards (72nd). Reed has the edge in passing success rate, Locke in passing yards.35%40%45%50%55%60%65%1,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,5002,750Efficient on low volumeVolume and efficiencyStrugglingVolume over efficiencyPassing yards →Passing success rate (per dropback) ↑ReedLocke
Sam Houston's Landyn Locke is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 37.8% passing success rate (137th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,703 passing yards (26th). Missouri State's Marcel Reed is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 39.1% passing success rate (129th of 171 quarterbacks) and 1,404 passing yards (72nd). Reed has the edge in passing success rate, Locke in passing yards.
PlayerPassing success rate (per dropback)Passing yards
Landyn Locke, Sam Houston37.8% (137th)1,703 (26th)
Marcel Reed, Missouri State39.1% (129th)1,404 (72nd)

How do the lead running backs compare?

How do the lead running backs compare? Sam Houston's Alton McCaskill is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.0 yards per carry (293rd of 360 running backs) and 42.6% rushing success rate (190th). Missouri State's Ramone Green Jr. is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.3 yards per carry (261st of 360 running backs) and 44.6% rushing success rate (154th). Green has the edge on both.24681040%50%60%70%80%Boom or bustEfficient and explosiveStrugglingMoves the chainsRushing success rate →Yards per carry ↑Green Jr.McCaskill
Sam Houston's Alton McCaskill is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.0 yards per carry (293rd of 360 running backs) and 42.6% rushing success rate (190th). Missouri State's Ramone Green Jr. is in the struggling corner, below average in both: 4.3 yards per carry (261st of 360 running backs) and 44.6% rushing success rate (154th). Green has the edge on both.
PlayerYards per carryRushing success rate
Alton McCaskill, Sam Houston4.0 (293rd)42.6% (190th)
Ramone Green Jr., Missouri State4.3 (261st)44.6% (154th)

How do the top receivers compare?

How do the top receivers compare? Sam Houston's Tim Burns Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (301st of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 329 receiving yards (157th). Sam Houston's Chris Reed is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (236th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 293 receiving yards (195th). Missouri State's Isaiah Myers is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 17 explosive catches (13th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 781 receiving yards (6th). Missouri State's Jmariyae Robinson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (225th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 318 receiving yards (172nd).05101520252004006008001,0001,200Big plays on low volumeGo-to deep threatsRole playersYards without the big playsReceiving yards →Explosive catches (16+ yards) ↑MyersRobinsonReedBurns Jr.
Sam Houston's Tim Burns Jr. is in the role players corner, below average in both: 5 explosive catches (301st of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 329 receiving yards (157th). Sam Houston's Chris Reed is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (236th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 293 receiving yards (195th). Missouri State's Isaiah Myers is in the go-to deep threats corner, above the average receivers and tight end in both explosive catches and receiving yards: 17 explosive catches (13th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 781 receiving yards (6th). Missouri State's Jmariyae Robinson is in the role players corner, below average in both: 6 explosive catches (225th of 669 receivers and tight ends) and 318 receiving yards (172nd).
PlayerExplosive catches (16+ yards)Receiving yards
Tim Burns Jr., Sam Houston5 (301st)329 (157th)
Chris Reed, Sam Houston6 (236th)293 (195th)
Isaiah Myers, Missouri State17 (13th)781 (6th)
Jmariyae Robinson, Missouri State6 (225th)318 (172nd)

Who makes the plays on defense?

Who makes the plays on defense? Sam Houston's top playmaker is Railyn Adams (2 INTs, 1 fumble recovery), 208th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Missouri State's top playmaker is Martavis Blackmon (1 sack, 2 fumble recoveries), 180th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.Railyn Adams, Sam Houston2 INTs, 1 fumble recoveryMartavis Blackmon, Missouri State1 sack, 2 fumble recoveriesElijah Groves, Sam Houston2 sacksJashawn Cooper, Missouri State1 sack, 1 INTJoel Boamah, Missouri State1 INT, 1 fumble recoveryBrian Bates Jr., Sam Houston1 sack
Sam Houston's top playmaker is Railyn Adams (2 INTs, 1 fumble recovery), 208th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways. Missouri State's top playmaker is Martavis Blackmon (1 sack, 2 fumble recoveries), 180th of 1571 FBS defenders in sacks plus takeaways.
PlayerSacksINTsFumble recoveriesFBS rank
Railyn Adams, Sam Houston021208th
Martavis Blackmon, Missouri State102180th
Elijah Groves, Sam Houston200494th
Jashawn Cooper, Missouri State110427th
Joel Boamah, Missouri State011428th
Brian Bates Jr., Sam Houston1001288th

The scatter charts show the top 40 FBS players at the position by both stats combined, plus the players lit here. Dashed lines are the averages; up and right is better. Ranks are among every FBS player at the position with enough snaps. Takeaways are interceptions plus fumble recoveries. Games through Oct 24, 2026.

How do SP+, PRIME and Elo rate Sam Houston and Missouri State?

On a neutral field, SP+ has Missouri State 1.1 points better (128th to 129th). PRIME also has Missouri State ahead, by 1.9. Elo, which only sees results, also has Missouri State ahead (123rd to 130th).

Sam HoustonMissouri State
SP+ overall-18.0 (129th)-16.9 (128th)
SP+ offense13.9 (132nd)19.0 (114th)
SP+ defense31.6 (109th)35.4 (128th)
SP+ special teams-0.4 (113th)-0.6 (131st)
PRIME net-15.0 (128th)-13.1 (121st)
PRIME offense-12.11 (136th)-3.88 (95th)
PRIME defense-2.30 (89th)-8.55 (130th)
PRIME SOS-6.9 (110th)-7.3 (117th)
PRIME SOR-4.3 (137th)-2.4 (122nd)
Elo1104 (130th)1187 (123rd)

Opponent-adjusted power ratings. These drive the projection.

Who's better once you adjust for the schedule?

Sam Houston's offense ranks 134th in adjusted EPA per play, and the Missouri State defense it faces ranks 137th in EPA per play allowed. Missouri State's offense ranks 113th against Sam Houston's 97th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge. The biggest edge on the board is Missouri State's backs in the open field: 97th in adjusted open-field yards per carry, against Sam Houston's 130th-ranked defense. Adjust for opponents and Sam Houston's defense falls from 63rd to 97th in EPA per play allowed: a lot of that came against soft offenses.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
EPA per play (adjusted)−0.03 (134th)+0.04 (113th)
EPA per pass (adjusted)+0.07 (133rd)+0.19 (70th)
EPA per rush (adjusted)−0.04 (133rd)−0.02 (126th)
Success rate (adjusted)36.7% (126th)40.4% (82nd)
Success rate, standard downs (adjusted)42.7% (127th)46.3% (77th)
Success rate, passing downs (adjusted)28.8% (108th)29.2% (99th)
Explosiveness (adjusted)0.93 (80th)0.89 (131st)
Line yards per carry (adjusted)2.62 (134th)2.85 (105th)
Open-field yards per carry (adjusted)0.97 (119th)1.04 (97th)
EPA per play allowed (adjusted)+0.14 (97th)+0.25 (137th)
EPA per pass allowed (adjusted)+0.15 (41st)+0.31 (129th)
EPA per rush allowed (adjusted)+0.14 (124th)+0.14 (119th)
Success rate allowed (adjusted)42.6% (81st)50.3% (137th)
Explosiveness allowed (adjusted)0.97 (119th)0.92 (29th)
Line yards allowed per carry (adjusted)3.10 (113th)3.17 (124th)
Open-field yards allowed per carry (adjusted)1.41 (130th)1.23 (94th)

The same efficiency numbers, adjusted for the offenses and defenses each team has faced (CollegeFootballData.com). A good number against a soft schedule shrinks; one against a hard schedule grows.

Who's more efficient, Sam Houston or Missouri State?

Sam Houston is better throwing (118th in EPA per pass) than running (136th). Missouri State's pass defense ranks 110th. Missouri State is better throwing (58th in EPA per pass) than running (115th). Sam Houston's pass defense ranks 13th, so the defense has the better of it.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
EPA per play−0.05 (133rd)+0.09 (88th)
EPA per pass+0.05 (118th)+0.25 (58th)
EPA per rush−0.18 (136th)0.00 (115th)
EPA per 3rd-down play+0.32 (102nd)+0.48 (62nd)
EPA per play allowed+0.08 (63rd)+0.23 (120th)
EPA per pass allowed0.00 (13th)+0.32 (110th)
EPA per rush allowed+0.18 (121st)+0.13 (100th)
EPA per 3rd-down play allowed+0.18 (15th)+0.59 (119th)

Expected points added per play, from CollegeFootballData.com. EPA measures how much each play changes the points a team can expect from the drive. Zero is break-even; +0.20 is very good. Not adjusted for opponents.

Who scores more, Sam Houston or Missouri State?

Sam Houston is outscored by 5.2 a game, and Missouri State is outscored by 10.5. Sam Houston's offense ranks 120th in scoring, and the Missouri State defense it faces ranks 130th in points allowed. Missouri State's offense ranks 96th against Sam Houston's 79th-ranked defense. Neither side of the ball has a clear edge.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
Points scored20.1 (120th)24.4 (96th)
Points allowed25.3 (79th)34.9 (130th)

Per game, FBS opponents only.

Which offense has the edge?

Sam Houston has no clear edge here. Its best is 3rd down conversion rate, 112th, against a defense ranked 124th in 3rd down conversions allowed. Missouri State has no clear edge here. Its best is yards per carry, 93rd, against a defense ranked 117th in yards per carry allowed.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
Pass yards / game252.4 (45th)246.3 (51st)
Rush yards / game105.0 (132nd)137.1 (105th)
Yards per play5.55 (111th)6.20 (64th)
Yards per carry4.25 (121st)4.82 (93rd)
Yards per attempt6.72 (108th)7.80 (63rd)
Completion %57.0% (100th)65.6% (53rd)
Success rate37.0% (124th)42.0% (84th)
Explosive play rate9.1% (127th)11.8% (82nd)
3rd down conversion33.3% (112th)34.8% (105th)
Sack rate (taken)5.4% (70th)5.6% (72nd)
INT rate (thrown)2.3% (65th)2.7% (87th)
SUPLEX50.0% (106th)56.6% (67th)

Per game and per play, from play-by-play.

Which defense has the edge?

Sam Houston's defense is best placed to get off the field on third down: it ranks 27th in 3rd down conversions allowed, and Missouri State's offense is bottom-40 in 3rd down conversion rate (105th). That's a mismatch. Missouri State's defense is best placed to stop the run: it ranks 91st in yards per carry allowed, and Sam Houston's offense is bottom-20 in yards per carry (121st).

Sam HoustonMissouri State
Pass yards allowed / game141.3 (4th)228.9 (101st)
Rush yards allowed / game210.3 (129th)175.3 (102nd)
Yards per play allowed5.64 (62nd)6.34 (101st)
Yards per carry allowed5.71 (117th)5.16 (91st)
Yards per attempt allowed5.96 (22nd)8.05 (93rd)
Success rate allowed41.1% (64th)50.2% (135th)
Explosive plays allowed12.4% (95th)13.0% (104th)
3rd downs allowed32.6% (27th)46.8% (124th)
Sack rate (generated)6.7% (55th)4.3% (111th)
INT rate (generated)3.6% (28th)1.5% (107th)
SUPLEX allowed56.6% (88th)61.6% (117th)

What opponents managed against them.

Who wins the turnover battle?

Neither team has a real turnover edge: Sam Houston is 0.0 a game and Missouri State −0.3.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
Interceptions thrown / game0.75 (75th)0.75 (75th)
Fumbles lost / game0.38 (42nd)0.50 (69th)
Giveaways / game1.13 (51st)1.25 (64th)
Interceptions / game0.75 (59th)0.38 (113th)
Fumbles recovered / game0.38 (89th)0.63 (40th)
Takeaways / game1.13 (81st)1.00 (88th)
Turnover margin / game0.0 (66th)-0.3 (85th)

Per game, from play-by-play.

Which team has more talent?

Sam Houston has the more talented roster (117th in the 247Sports talent composite; Missouri State is 119th). But Missouri State plays further above its talent: −9.8 points of SP+ beyond what its roster predicts, to Sam Houston's −11.2.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
Talent composite554.5 (117th)549.9 (119th)
Blue-chip ratio1.7% (120th)5.5% (96th)
Players on roster106 (99th)104 (112th)
Rated by 247Sports58 (123rd)55 (129th)
5-star players0 (37th)0 (37th)
4-star players1 (119th)3 (94th)
3-star players55 (93rd)47 (110th)
Below 3-star2 (68th)5 (29th)
2026 transfers in22 (63rd)21 (67th)
Transfer share37.9% (37th)38.2% (36th)
SP+ vs. talent-11.2 (125th)-9.8 (124th)
Returning production57.7% (46th)31.3% (87th)
Returning passing production-31.1% (132nd)5.3% (94th)
Returning rushing production-3.2% (120th)-3.2% (120th)
Returning receiving production56.8% (35th)47.4% (52nd)
2026 recruiting class (national rank)126 (126th)131 (131st)
Recruiting rank, last four classes117.0 (122nd)133.5 (131st)

247Sports team talent composite and 2026 transfer portal class. Star counts cover only the players 247Sports rates, not walk-ons, so they add up to less than the full roster. Ranks are out of all 138 FBS teams.

Where did each team's wins come from?

Sam Houston is −2.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.6). Missouri State is −1.5 wins against a .500 team; the biggest piece is coaching (−1.4). Sam Houston's record is 1.2 wins worse than its play on bad luck, so it's better than the record says.

Sam HoustonMissouri State
BAWA (total)-2.5 (129th)-1.5 (115th)
Schedule BAWA+0.9 (46th)+1.1 (40th)
Roster BAWA-0.6 (109th)-0.7 (114th)
Coach BAWA-1.6 (126th)-1.4 (121st)
Luck BAWA-1.2 (129th)-0.5 (96th)

Big Al Wins Added: where the wins came from. Every team starts as a .500 team. Then each win (or loss) goes to the schedule, the roster, the coaching or luck, and the four add up to the real record. Wins above or below a .500 team.

Sam Houston at Missouri State: questions people ask

Who will win Sam Houston at Missouri State?

Big Al picks Missouri State, 64% to win. All three ratings favor the same team.

When and where is Sam Houston at Missouri State?

Tue, Oct 27, 8:00 PM ET at Plaster Sports Complex, on ESPN2.

What's the line for Sam Houston at Missouri State?

DraftKings has Missouri State −6, total 51.5. Big Al picks winners, not bets.

What's the Sam Houston–Missouri State series record?

It's tied 1–1. Last meeting: Sam Houston won 20–17 in 2006.

Who are the quarterbacks in Sam Houston at Missouri State?

Sam Houston's is Landyn Locke (1,703 passing yards this season); Missouri State's is Marcel Reed (1,404 passing yards this season).

More on this game

Numbers through the games of Oct 24, 2026. SP+ as of Oct 27, 2026. Updated every week.

Sam Houston and Missouri State: team pages with every stat and national rank. Compare any two teams.